Domain: techtimes.com
Stories and comments across the archive that link to techtimes.com.
Comments · 61
-
Re:Bah hah hah
-
Re:A bit????
I believe Apple phones now have a function to periodically change their broadcast MAC for this very reason. Does anyone know of a tool for Android that does the same thing?
-
Re:No Google
[citation needed].
Apple includes of an undocumented file-relay service in iOS that is only useful for spying.
"Its sole purposes is to dish out data, bypass backup encryption, and give you almost the same amount of personal data you get from a backup on the phone, in some cases even more. We really need someone at Apple to step up and explain why this is here. There's no logical reason why it should be there on 600 million devices," points out Zdziarski.
http://www.techtimes.com/artic...
The NSA may be responsible for iOS 7’s biggest security vulnerability.
According to a tweet from Jeffery Grossman, this vulnerability has been present in the software since iOS 6. Based on the leaked PowerPoint document which exposed PRISM, Apple and its devices were added to the NSA program in October 2012, just one month after the release of iOS 6. Whether or not the NSA planted the exploit itself, Gruber believes there is a chance the government agency was aware of it and took advantage of it to gain access to private information.
“Once the bug was in place, the NSA wouldn’t even have needed to find the bug by manually reading the source code,” wrote Gruber. “All they would need are automated tests using spoofed certificates that they run against each new release of every OS. Apple releases iOS, the NSA’s automated spoofed certificate testing finds the vulnerability, and boom, Apple gets “added” to PRISM.”
-
Alternative Story that is not paywalled
-
Re:good
With the rate of adoption of the newest Android releases, this wont affect too many people.
-
Re:Apples and Oranges (buses are not cars)
I see a lot of cars driving around 80% empty.
Just wait until the self-driving cars get on the road in mass. They'll be 100% empty!
No? Right now I can email Pizza Hut and have them make me a pizza for pick-up. Automate the billing (I use a credit card to pay -- oh noes, how am I ever going to get that to them?) and have the (correct) pizza inserted in the car window, which then drives itself back home. Delivery? No thanks, I'll have my car do it. Hell, add a Coke (NOT Pepsi!) to that and I'll have the dual A/C cool it while keeping the pizza piping hot.
Upscaling that via Sams Club (Cosco), Staples, and others: right now you can place your order by internet and have it waiting on you for pickup. Now just pay a little extra for handling to have it placed in your car for you.
Why on Earth would I want to waste my time shopping (for standard items) when I can pay a small extra amount and not go at all?
Note: It'll be a cold day in hell before the self-driving car is accepted on the road for one simple reason: Liability Insurance. (Read: lawsuits and punitive damanges for the owner of the killer car, the mechanic who last worked on it, the car company that designed and built it, the programmers who worked on the software, and the sensor manufacturers. The parent/spouse of the first person hurt or killed by a self-driving car will win a large fraction of our national GDP. And if the lawyers are ambitious enough, it might even BE the GDP. My car bruised little Johnny inside who wasn't wearing a seat belt while doing an emergency stop? I don't care if the MS legal contracts say "Not for use in life-critical applications" -- you used it while building the car and software; you're libel as well.) That you might actually not be at fault has actually nothing to do with it.
And the other reason: TERRORISM! (They've won, by the way, if our government is so scared of them they're trying to control all of us.) Just think of all of the evil people who could pack the car full to the brim of explosives / radiation / anchovies and have it drive itself somewhere and explode? Think I'm joking?
Ummm: they can do that right now by adding a driver/drone who can also steer the car off-road while the car itself can't. They don't care at all about the driver; I don't think driver-LESS cars will make any difference. It'd be cheaper to buy a "normal" car and add a suicide driver than it would be to buy an "automatic" one.
Nice try, FBI and all -- but sorry, that's one's a miss. Keep trying; you can't guard against what you can't envision. Then again, remember: cost/benefit - don't guard against EVERYTHING, there is no 100.00000% safety. Ever. Anywhere. "We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security." -- Some Ignorant, Worthless Dude who Obviously didn't know Anything about Important Things. -
Re:As much as I hate Apple
You are also oh so conveniently ignoring one tiny little fact, year over year DEVICE SALES ARE GOING UP! Yes, market share is going down, but that's largely because the smartphone market has been growing so fast, Apple's share of it hasn't been growing as fast as the market has. You want to know whose sales have been dipping recently? Samsungs!. But don't let those silly facts get in the way of your baseless ranting!
-
Re:NT is best
-
Re:Underwater volcanoes, not CO2
Underwater volcanoes, not climate change, reason behind melting of West Antarctic Ice Sheet
Your article: Underwater volcanoes, not climate change, reason behind melting of West Antarctic Ice Sheet. Original release from UT Austin: Researchers Find Major West Antarctic Glacier Melting from Geothermal Sources. Your article: "Melting of a major glacier system in western Antarctica may be caused by underwater volcanoes, and not by global climate change, according to new research." Source article: " Thwaites Glacier, the large, rapidly changing outlet of the West Antarctic Ice Sheet, is not only being eroded by the ocean, itâ(TM)s being melted from below by geothermal heat". Tech times: Completely fucking full of shit, do not cite again. Not logging in: Anonymous cowardice, completely understandable in light of your poor citation. Slashdot: Still badly in need of unicode support, like every other goddamned website of our time.
-
Re:It's about time
Read my orignal link.
http://www.techtimes.com/artic...I can see how they would back down from that.
http://www.americanthinker.com...
http://gawker.com/arrest-clima...
It's not like they are free to say anything about anything they find without fear of repercussions.
-
Re:It's about time
I dunno.. Do you?