Slashdot Mirror

Would you be surprised at this point? Israel has nukes and a secret chemical and biological weapons program. Israel has more nukes than France and are 1/10th the size in population. That is the only thing holding back the Arab states from running them over with their combined forces in this day and age. Israel is increasingly an untenable state, for the fact that when anyone who does not like them manages to get nukes (i.e. Iran) a single 100kt nuke would be enough to cripple the country and 10-20 to make the entire country glow like the surface of the sun. Israel is too small to have nukes, they are undeclared and have unknown capabilities in range and destructive power. I am more scared of hard right wingers in Israel coming to power than Iran at this point as the constant disregard for human life in Palestine shows that Israel would do anything to survive and that could mean doing crazy shit like targeting Europe or the United States if we attempt to force a 2-state solution.

There is actually no evidence for the Holocaust, because the Nazis made the evidence vanish.
The lack of evidence proves that the Nazis did erase the evidence. Erasal of evidence proves that the Holocaust happened...

Howe is this one as an equivalent line of argument?!
The egyptians had wireless communication. How do we know this? There were telegraph posts!

Let's face it: Holocaust sensitivity training is inducing hate against Germans in English schools. It is also shielding the Zionist oppression of Arabs from effective criticism.
We don't need to have that at the taxpayers expense.

Find out what Holocaust Revisionists really say:
http://vho.org/Intro/GB/index.html

If I decide to take a short holiday I can strap on my backpack and go for a 30-country tour, stopping in each and filing a motion against my victim. Even big companies would find it time-consuming and expensive to respond to each complaint. Medium, small companies and individuals have no chance of handling them all. One gets through, and by not appearing, the Judge rules that I am the winner and demands my victim makes payment.

In theory unenforcable, but if my victim steps foot in said company, opens a local office, enters a partnership, buys a holiday house or mail order, well, their assets are mine! (laughs manically)

It's all very well for this judge make findings like this against Limey corporations, but it can work the other way. Libel laws in Australia are draconian. When Australian Businessman Joe Gutnick was named in an article by Dow Jones that he had an association with a money launderer. Gutnick sued Dow Jones, but instad of suing Dow Jones in America, the place of duplication, Gutnick found amenable Australian Courts that said he could sue in Australia because that's where Gutnick read the article. What a can of worms that opened.

http://www.vho.org/News/GB/News1_03.html "Internet: Can Everybody Sue Everybody everywhere?"
http://www.findlaw.com.au/article/2104.htm

Fact is judges should not make rulings about cases that have no jurisdiction. If the judge made the ruling because he was annoyed, then he's an ass and not fit for the job. If he made it because it's the law, the law's an ass.

I'll make a prediction: When multi-million dollar judgements start getting made in other countries against big American companies, you'll see the law quickly changed by Congress and pushed through to other countries using the "sign this treaty or life will get very hard" approach used with the DMCA. Why this hasn't happened already I'm not sure. Dow Jones is big enough.

"Tito, despite being a dictator, did much good for his people and was respected"

There's more similarity than you realize. Tito was also fond of slaughtering large numbers of people (hundreds of thousands) for being of the wrong ethnicity or for some minor reason of non-conformity. Sure, Saddam had many fans too, but like with Saddam, it was hard to find anyone under his rule who did not have a family member or friend killed by one of Tito's purges. And then there was his habit of mass "deportations" between the ethnic sections of the country. Contrast him with Saddam? Not nearly as easy as you think.

Well if you think India was not affected by WWII, read this and this. Compare the number of death in the stated artificial 'famine' with that of the holocaust.

This is like the old dropping the leaflets out of the planes with the "Surrender or you will be attacked" in different languages.

Propaganda is apparently often more insidious than that. The British propaganda messages of WWI spectacularly backfired in WWII: if you lie in WWI about industrial production of glue from human bodies by the Germans, nobody will believe you if you tell them in WWII that the Germans are gassing the Jews and turning them into soap. The part about the soap is an untruth, btw, and one that may have actually been invented by the Nazis as a lie about themselves. Hitler, being after all a soldier in the German trenches of WWI, believed for a long time that he could get away with the Holocaust because it was too outrageous to be credible. As Hitler put it: "Who, after all, speaks today of the annihilation of the Armenians?".

The "Surrender or you will be attacked" leaflets are really intended for consumption by the home audience. Propaganda works best against home audiences anyway: nearly any side in any war succeeds in convincing its home audience that they are the good guys. Convincing foreign audiences is a lot harder.

From TFA:
"Information intended for foreign audiences, including public diplomacy and Psyops, is increasingly consumed by our domestic audience," [..] The stories - all supportive of US policy - were written by military personnel and then placed in Iraqi publications.

I'm calling bullshit. The Iraqi newspapers are intended for consumption by Western journalists who want to be deceived. The purpose of this "declassified document" propaganda is to portray US propaganda as 1) clumsy and non-threatening, and 2) not targeted at the home audience.

The german Nazis had flying saucer technology before the US. After the war the US took over the projects.

http://www.vho.org/D/Geheim1/29g.htm

There were previous stories on /. about several european companies that had developed working prototypes of the 3d floating tv/image holo display type technology.

And of course we already have lasers and tons of other technology. But dont forget the US military has technology that most of us will never see.

in National Socialism, all infrastructure which is common to the people is nationalized -- so power, water, roads, rail, airline, et etera. health care and schools and junk too I guess.

Then there are small private enterprises -- your bakers, cobblers, tailors and junk.

Citizens are entitled to all public services, but are required in turn to serve the public.

Non citizens get whatever's the leftovers because they don't belong anyway and need to go away.

National Socialism is actually rather nice. Except this pesky "Third Reich" experiment at it went horribly wrong. or did it?
http://vho.org/GB/c/DC/gcgvcole.html

David Cole, a Jew, says the gassings never happened and are fabricated by the Jewish Bolshevick Soviet Union.

True or not, holocaust or not, National Socailism is nice. So long as people stay on their own side of the street. Moochers and parasites must be dealt with, of course. But citizens are rather independent outside of their required service (military).

...if somebody tried to prove to you that the Holocaust didn't happen?