Slashdot Mirror


Search

Search the archive with full-text matching across story titles, bodies, and comments. Phrases are quoted; or, -word, and parentheses behave as in a web search. Queries must be at least 3 characters.

Comments · 3,859

  1. Re:Nuke the godless slant eyed fucks, NOW. by Tablizer on China Builds Artificial Islands In South China Sea · · Score: 4, Funny

    That's how Godzilla was born, I hope you know.

  2. Re:Nuke the godless slant eyed fucks, NOW. by Anonymous Coward on China Builds Artificial Islands In South China Sea · · Score: 0

    Eat a nuke, living scum.

  3. Re:Nuke the godless slant eyed fucks, NOW. by Tablizer on China Builds Artificial Islands In South China Sea · · Score: 0

    Uh, you are not helping

  4. Re:Nuke the godless slant eyed fucks, NOW. by Anonymous Coward on China Builds Artificial Islands In South China Sea · · Score: 0

    Did you miss the part about equality means nuking everybody equally? You deserve to be nuked for missing the joke.

  5. Re:Nuke the godless slant eyed fucks, NOW. by Anonymous Coward on China Builds Artificial Islands In South China Sea · · Score: -1

    ... slant eyed? They were born that way, you racist extremist.

    BWAHAHAHAHA !!!!

    Did your knee hurt your face when it jerked in reaction to my post, you pathetic
    little politically correct cunt ?

    You obviously don't know what the Chinese are really like. Sure, they were "born that
    way" but only a naive fucktard like you embraces moronic ideas like "everyone is
    equal" or "all races are the same".

  6. NUKE them NOW. by Anonymous Coward on China Builds Artificial Islands In South China Sea · · Score: -1

    It will only cost more later to deal with the problem, when these godless
    slanteyed fucks decide they need to take over the US.

  7. Re:Nuke the godless slant eyed fucks, NOW. by Anonymous Coward on China Builds Artificial Islands In South China Sea · · Score: -1

    Godless fucks, sure, but slant eyed? They were born that way, you racist extremist.

    Equality for all! Nuke EVERYBODY.

  8. Nuke the godless slant eyed fucks, NOW. by Anonymous Coward on China Builds Artificial Islands In South China Sea · · Score: -1

    Right now what I wrote sounds extreme.

    10 years from now you will all then understand I saw the future you did not yet see,
    and you will call me prescient and wish those in power had done what I suggested.

  9. Re:Political correctness is a godless communist fu by Anonymous Coward on Yahoo's Diversity Record Is Almost As Bad As Google's · · Score: 0

    Political correctness is indeed be communist godlessness, but dude, I just have to ask, what on Earth are you smoking?

  10. Political correctness is a godless communist funda by Anonymous Coward on Yahoo's Diversity Record Is Almost As Bad As Google's · · Score: 0

    Consciousness works by pushing us to recreate the experience the fetus has in the womb in our life experience. Males try to recreate this experience by making the universe into our womb. Females already have a womb, so they concentrate their efforts on the relationships and connections of the experience, while males expand science by the futile and infinite task of making the universe their womb. Political correctness is a religion.

  11. Re:Massive conspiracy by davide+marney on IRS Lost Emails of 6 More Employees Under Investigation · · Score: 1

    Anyone who would use "Only a godless sinner" to justify an evil action such as cutting off people's heads or driving jet planes full of fuel into office buildings is NOT a religious person, they are a political person who has hijacked religion in the name of their cause. Is the KKK a "Christian" organization? Please. There are millions of peaceable Muslims living in the US. Look around you.

  12. Re:Massive conspiracy by wierd_w on IRS Lost Emails of 6 More Employees Under Investigation · · Score: 3, Informative

    AC, you clearly are in need of a massive civics lesson.

    Read these words, and meditate on them:

    "I disapprove of what you say, but will defend to the death your right to say it."

    When you start making it "OK" to silence people you disagree with or disapprove of, it opens the doors for people who disapprove of you, or disagree with your views to silence YOU.

    We make the acts of discrimination illegal. Not the idea. People are entitled to their own beliefs, even if those beliefs cannot be substantiated with evidence. We counter this with being allowed to hold our own beliefs, which we attest are substantiated with evidence.

    When you start telling people that they must believe the same way that you do, you are perpetrating the same crime that religious authority figures commit when they go on holy wars and crusades.

    Resorting to hyperbole, like "only a racist would call this thing a scandal.", you are tit-for-tat in line with religious oppressors that claim things like "Only an infidel" or "Only a godless sinner" to justify their actions.

    Do you want to be with that group?

  13. Curse this godless country! by Jade_Wayfarer on Why the Moon's New Birthday Means the Earth Is Older Than We Thought · · Score: -1, Troll

    Curse these godless heathens! Now all of Young Earth Creationists will have one more fact to ignore. It ain't easy already!

  14. communism by Anonymous Coward on Canadian Supreme Court Delivers Huge Win For Internet Privacy · · Score: 0

    The track record of political and religious systems has been a 99% extinction rate. The godless communist religion of political correctness is betting our species on its religious/political experiment. By supporting the experiment you are supporting the outcome. Sounds like a suicide cult to me. Do you hope to be reborn? That's what they're selling you. But you have to die first.

  15. Re:Keep ignoring the Scriptures..... by dbreeze on Fasting Triggers Stem Cell Regeneration of Damaged, Old Immune System · · Score: 2
  16. Speaking of Ignorance., by Anonymous Coward on Ask Slashdot: Communication With Locked-in Syndrome Patient? · · Score: 0

    How fortunate that religion was banned by progressive utopias like the USSR and the PRC.

    No, you are wrong. Religion was not banned.

    The #1 religion in China is Christianity and IS practiced freely. Who'd thunk it?

    And the USSR? Religion was not banned either. You got suckered by US propaganda - religious propaganda I might add. See, back in the 50's or so, the powers that be wanted to paint the Communists - at least the Soviets - as these Godless anti-American anti-Capitalists. And yet the Russian Orthodox church survived.

    How about that.

    It's a shame that the mods are so ignorant. And I constantly ask myself, "Why do I bother with Slashdot? Aside from the occasional insightful post about technology, Slashdotters are just as, if not more ignorant than the general populace."

    But ...it's part of my growth. See, I am also arrogant - just like everyone here on Slashdot. We think we are SO special because we understand things that the general population doesn't.

    And yet, I keep coming back .... I AM a loser.

  17. Re:It is God. by Anonymous Coward on Supermassive Black Hole At the Centre of Galaxy May Be Wormhole In Disguise · · Score: 1
  18. Re:"...happen again" by Anonymous Coward on Why Hollywood's Best Robot Stories Are About Slavery · · Score: 0

    Don't go blaming religion for people being evil and stupid. Unless you are prepared to explain the 20th Century and the hundred plus million killed by the godless.

  19. No... it's not about Microsoft. Or security. by denzacar on Why Microsoft Shouldn't Patch the XP Internet Explorer Flaw · · Score: 1

    This is even dumber.

    The idea that this entire opinion piece runs on is that same old story where money belonging to a single large business is worth more than the sum of the money belonging to its customers.
    Because... Freedom, Justice and the American Dream*.
    As opposed to godless communist pinko consumer rights satanists.

    Cause that is what the "argument" that "Microsoft cannot feasibly continue to support Windows XP indefinitely" boils down to - nonsense.

    Why can't they support it? Is it the technological ability? Did they fire everyone who knew how to code? Who made those other, "safe", products then?
    Is it that they can't release secrets about their obsolete products to new staff? What?

    Other than "it costs XY dollars to do ZQ fix", which other reason could there be?
    He even suggests spending money on new Microsoft, Apple or Linux products (free as in pay for training and new hardware infrastructure including hiring or retraining your support personnel) - as only possible solution.

    So clearly... money is the issue. And the solution.
    When a company spends it - it's an issue.
    When customers spend it - it's a solution.

    So, just as clearly, it's not the customer's money but company's money that's precious here.
    Microsoft's, Apple's... whoever. People should save money to companies that sell them products.
    Customers should just shut up and switch to new software (and hardware to run it) already and support the economy by doing their duty as customers - by spending money.

    Or are they America-hatin commie-pinko terrorists?

     
     
     
    *fauxtriotism added to accentuate the nonsense of the underlying argument of said opinion piece.

  20. Re:If you make this a proof of God... by marcello_dl on Mathematical Proof That the Cosmos Could Have Formed Spontaneously From Nothing · · Score: 1

    U mad.
    There is no premise. There is a counterexample. One guy said one cosmological theory with sound math behind it puts the words GAME OVER to the debate about god, so anybody who brings a god again into the discussion deserves to be punched.
    I made an example of a universe without intervention and freedom which is still not godless. I made another more general example in another comment where proving that the universe arises from complete nothingness AND that no other way for the universe to exist is rational, would be a great achievement for science but still not sufficient because the assumption that what is inconceivable for us is meta-inconceivable everywhere, even in the scope of universes' creation.

    A counterexample is not an assumption, it is the exploration of a particular case to see whether an assumption somebody else made has any worth. Picking a particular case assumes all other things do not happen, but that is not an assumption because we are not ending up with an implication. If you read my comment like it is a proof, it is your problem.

    Whitehead and Copleston sounds like a good name combination for alcohol related products BTW.