Slashdot Mirror


Mike Shaver Leaving Netscape

Rumours have been floating around for the past week or so that Mike Shaver is leaving Netscape/AOL After e-mailing with Mike yesterday, and reading the recent posting on Mozillazine, I'm sad to confirm it's true. However, while he won't be working on Mozilla as his full time job anymore, he will still be involved with the project, going so far as to say: "Though Mozilla will no longer be my full-time job, I will continue to participate in the community as much as possible, and my new employer is very supportive of that." In any case, we'll miss you.

22 of 76 comments (clear)

  1. Feel free to pitch in by FascDot+Killed+My+Pr · · Score: 3

    Mozilla doesn't require AOL's support to become a reality. It requires developers.

    Stop crying in your beer and start coding (or documenting, or testing, or ANYTHING).
    ---

    --
    Linux MAPI Server!
    http://www.openone.com/software/MailOne/
    (Exchange Migration HOWTO coming soon)
    1. Re:Feel free to pitch in by MattMann · · Score: 3
      "pitch in" is good advice in general, but I've looked into working on Mozilla a number of times over the past couple of years and they don't make it easy.

      the first couple of times I just downloaded the FAQ, tarballs, INSTALLING, whatever, and I'd plod along following the instructions and after wasting a few hours I discover: no motif, no build. jerkoffs, why didn't they mention that before? The only place that little message was "documented" was in a make error message.

      so, things have moved a bit since then, but "fool me once..." ... now when I get the urge to work on it, I go and read ahead as much as possible, last time was last summer. Always, I get this queasy feeling that the people inside the project have carved out a little world for themselves that makes them happy, but an "outsider" is going to have to go through a maze of twisty turny passages to get there. This is a big project, and it's a big maze, so the fun of contributing seems way off in the distance ...

      OK, I didn't want to shoot off my mouth without checking again. Here's today's report. It's brief because they managed to disconvince me again in a couple of sentences. From the hacking docs, and my quotes are paraphrasals, not literal.

      1. Mozilla has "a great build system that has scaled to 100s of developers, so follow the rules and don't break it." OK? OK! I can follow rules.

      2. "Confirm that your code works on all the different platforms before checking it in. Don't break the build!" OK? Nah uh! You guys don't have a build system, you have a makefile called from a shell script. Asking me to build on more than one platform is too much. I actually write code for multiple platforms and I think it's too much. What about all the people who don't? E-mail code to a pal and have them test it? Sheesh, that is primitive, not to mention I don't have any pals on Mozilla... yeah, I could hang around ... Look, build just the tiniest bit of support for it into the source repository, and organize a buddy system for me. If one person breaking something wastes 100*1 man-hours (mythical? :) then spend that time to make the build system deal. That way you won't have to excoriate me for breaking the build before I've even downloaded the source. You could say, happy things like, "come on in and contribute, we'll help you, we'll make it easy for you, we'll show you how"

      ok, but forge ahead, Mann, perhaps it'll be ok. ...hmmm, I don't know about this, there are a lot of tools to upgrade. No, not their fault, gotta have tools, but certainly not something I want to contemplate if this isn't going to work out...

      Oh look! the instructions for Linux (the largest open OS platform) Redhat (the largest distro) are labelled "out of date". So, I'm going to be on my own here... I think I'll check back in a few months, maybe after the release.

      ya know, if it's three guys in a garage, sure, they can't keep it all going and porting is the sort of help they need. but 100s of engineers with a paid staff are telling me that this is a great system? They want me to help them, and contribute under a license that the FUD tells me is suspect to begin with? Fine, then roll out the red carpet for me by making it as easy to get started as the linux kernel. "make config ; make dep ; make bzImage ; make modules " Then, after I've played around a bit, if I have something interesting to say, give me a way to share it. But just 10 minutes of scrolling through their stuff on top of the time I've wasted in the past tells me that they love working on the "cool" parts of the code and don't pay much attention to infrastructure, infrastructure that is by definition huge and important because this is a crossplatform system with hundreds of engineers.

      Don't get me wrong, I am not criticizing them. I'm not? No, I'm not. They are writing a lot of code and giving it away, how could I criticize that? I think it's great! I think they are great :) :) But if the shopkeeper wants to know why I came in and browsed around the shop and then walked out without buying anything...

      It's not them it's me? Yep, probably that's it, the system is working fine. They successfully sent away somebody who shouldn't be working on it :)

    2. Re:Feel free to pitch in by coredog · · Score: 2

      I'll second that emotion.

      Back in the day, I downloaded the source. I had the correct compiler VC++ 5.0 (this is really old-school) and I had a fast (for the day) machine: K6-233 w/ 64MB.

      So while the download progressed, I watched a movie. And then another.

      I unzip the files, to find that they recommend 128MB of memory to develop, and I gotta download some more tools. Fine. I download the extra tools and figure I'll just deal with a 4 hour compile time. 15 minutes into the compile, error. I do some looking around, some tweaking, and try again. Another error. Delete!

      Fast forward to more recent history(when even eMachines have 64MB of memory :) and I think I'll try again. Gecko looked pretty interesting. So I go looking for instructions and source. I can find the email address of the maintainer. Should I email him? Nah, he doesn't need a bunch of clueless newbies asking him where to get the source. Next!

      I'm not saying I require Natalie Portman to come over and cook me some hot grits while I write code, but, damn! I've had an easier time getting source code from companies that require NDAs!

      --
      Do anal-retentive people hyphenate 'anal retentive'?
    3. Re:Feel free to pitch in by Mike+Shaver · · Score: 2
      Fine, then roll out the red carpet for me by making it as easy to get started as the linux kernel. "make config ; make dep ; make bzImage ; make modules "
      How does "./configure; make" sound? If the build instructions bother you, what about filing a bug?
    4. Re:Feel free to pitch in by MattMann · · Score: 2
      How does "./configure; make" sound?

      sounds great! if that's all it is, put that in your HowToBuildOnRedHat and it'll be 95% shorter and you can get rid of the "out of date" label! Hmmm... sure sounds easy, doesn't it? :)

      If the build instructions bother you, what about filing a bug?

      :) I read this as, "if you don't like the way we do A, come and learn how we do B,", meaning, have you looked at your bug-filing system? I have, that's something else I poured effort into. It's pages and pages of rules and standards, including the instruction that I review all of the existing bugs first. Look at that link! Ouch! Where is the build system? I'm looking to dip my toe in the water, and you are offering me assimilation into a Borg hive.

      I'm not saying there is nothing good about the work you've done, you have to meet the needs of the people on the project, I understand. But if there was a vacation package maybe I'd like it enough to come back and buy a home later.

      Or not! I freely admit the project may not need people like me.

  2. Outmoded thinking by Skyshadow · · Score: 5
    There's no crime in making money off your efforts. Open source isn't about making a product exclusively by hobbyists, it's about making the best products possible via peer review. Paid OSS developers have actually come out with some pretty nifty stuff (look at what Red Hat's developers come up with, or look at the new UI toys from Caldera or Corel).

    If you can find someone to pay you to do something you love or if, like JWZ, you can convince your employer that the OSS philosophy is a good way to go, then more power to you.

    Besides, you should be applauding Shaver -- once again, he's working on Mozilla in a volunteer way.

    ----

    --
    Every year during my review, I just pray the words "slashdot.org" aren't mentioned.
    1. Re:Outmoded thinking by luge · · Score: 2

      I very much agree with everything you say about being paid to do OSS, but I do want to point out that if you think Corel's GUI stuff is OSS, you are sadly mistaken. AFAIK, though a backend was promised, none of their code has made their way back into the hands of the Debian people, and it was unfree enough that they had to get license exceptions written into a lot of the various debian utilities which were previously pure GPL. Just my rant for the day...
      ~luge

      --

      IAAL,BIANLY

  3. Re:Shaver and jwz are evil for open source movemen by WhyteRabbyt · · Score: 4

    >Open source and payed developer doesn't work. The only true open source is VOLUNTEERSOURCE.

    This is such utter nonsense that its probably not worth responding to, but I feel compelled to, anyway...

    Can you just remind me, dear Coward, whether or not Mr Stallman draws his unemplyment checks and codes on the side? Or is he on a salary from FSF? (or rather was he, since I seem to recall him saying he had no time to write code anymore) I could be wrong, but I guess I have to say I think its the latter. Doesnt Alan Cox work for Red Hat? Dont VA Research pay salaries for Rasterman and Mandrake? Wasn't Larry Wall working for JPL when patch, Perl et.c were first written?

    You see, Mr Coward, it doesnt actually matter where the money comes from (unless its arms sales, which I personally disapprove of, but is generally minimal as a source of Open Source development funding.)

    What matters is the work; what matters is the code, and the license. What matters is what they gave. Mr C., I'd put my money on both these gentlemen ('Shaver and jwz') having contributed more to Open Source last week than you've done in your life.

    So what if they got stock options. You think only rock stars and film stars are allowed to make money? Gee, imagine someone having a comfortable life because they did good things for the world at large.

    --
    free experimental electronic music netlabel at www.viablehybrid.com
  4. Who steps in now? by DarkClown · · Score: 2

    So, who becomes resident talking head now? Shaver has done quite well for mozilla both within the open source community (he's done some kick ass fud damage control here on slashdot) and to the world at large. And look at his checkin logs from bonsai (which is apparently down for maintenence at the moment). Happy to see that he'll still be involved with mozilla.

  5. Browser war is not over, probably never will be! by Chuck+Chunder · · Score: 2

    You say that the browser war has been won by MS, but the fact is that the browser war is not over and is never likely to be.

    The simple truth is that in the software world no matter how much of a lead you may have, that doesn't mean that it's easy to keep. Netscape could take another year to release their next browser, and when it arrives it'll appear on every magazine cover CD, for every platform under the sun and people will try it. If the browser is good then people will use it and the fact that Netscape didn't have a decent product for years and years will mean less and less.

    Anyway, perhaps it's a good thing that IE is dominating, with Microsoft broken into three bits and IE opensourced then Netscape-AOL-Time-Warner will be the big conglomerate boogie-man ;D

    --
    Boffoonery - downloadable Comedy Benefit for Bletchley Park
  6. Mozilla is now "Dogfood" by Matts · · Score: 5

    I just submitted this to slash, but I doubt it'll get posted as a main article...

    Mozilla is now unoffically dogfood status according to the latest status report. The evaluation of whether it's dogfood or not is if at least 50% of mozilla.org are using mozilla for at least 50% of their browsing time. After that, bugs start getting fixed faster as people are really using the product (and pressuring their peers to make it better).

    For those that haven't tried a nightly build - do so. It's incredibly unintrusive (just installs in your $HOME directory - and can be deleted just as easily), real stable, and is great as an every day browser.

    --

    Matt. Want XML + Apache + Stylesheets? Get AxKit.
    1. Re:Mozilla is now "Dogfood" by asa · · Score: 5

      two quick comments:

      Try a nightly build, M12 is a dinosaur.
      If you feel like Mozilla is the property of AOL and so contributing to the project is contributing to AOL then I think you have a fundamental misunderstanding of what Mozilla is. Mozilla is the property of mozilla.org. AOL/Netscape will distribute a branded version of Mozila under the Netscape brand (and possibly others) but no one is asking you to work on that branded version. If you're interested in contributing to Mozilla but not AOL then look for peripheral projects that are using mozilla like some of the other web browsers or HTML editors that are utilizing pieces of the mozilla project. Maybe the MathML folks need some help in documentation. Maybe Adam Locke could use some help in his Active X wrapper. There are many places to contribute to the project and many good reasons (I believe) to do so. If you would like some of my reasons, here they are:

      1. Mozilla will run on just about any platform and you can't say that for most other browsers.
      2. Mozilla is open source so you can expect it to get better faster than conventional proprietary software.
      3. Mozilla will be the leader in standards support which means that we'll all have an easier time developing for the web.
      4. Mozilla is forcing others (including MS IE) to make standards support a key feature.
      5. It's fun.

      I hope that you don't decide to withhold your help because some large corporation is spending its money to help develop an open source project.

      Asa

      (posted with a 1/11/00 nightly build of Mozilla)

  7. Re:Shaver and jwz are evil for open source movemen by bero-rh · · Score: 2

    Open source and payed developer doesn't work. The only true open source is VOLUNTEERSOURCE.

    This is not quite true. I'm giving Red Hat as an example simply because that's the environment I'm familiar with; I'm quite sure the same holds true of most other paid open source developers:

    Virtually all people who get hired have been working on open source projects (as volunteers) before.
    I was quite glad I could stop studying and devote ALL of my time to Linux (instead of just my free time) when I got the offer.
    Just because we're paid doesn't mean it's just a job for us.

    Those people work at nights.

    You'd be surprised at seeing how busy the Red Hat offices are at nights or in the weekends.
    And no, nights and weekends are not paid overtime. We just want to get it right.

    Those people come from different countries.

    So who claimed all Red Hat employees are from the same contry?

    --
    This message is provided under the terms outlined at http://www.bero.org/terms.html
  8. MS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

    his new employer is Microsoft.

  9. Is Mike leaving NetScape or Mozilla? by Sam+Ruby · · Score: 2
    Those two are NOT synonyms.

    Based on my read of the article, he is only leaving AOL/NetScape.

    --
    - Sam Ruby
    1. Re:Is Mike leaving NetScape or Mozilla? by Gleef · · Score: 2

      According to the article, he's leaving AOL/Netscape. Apparently he found some really attractive job that he's not allowed to talk about right now. He plans to continue working on Mozilla in his spare time, and his new employer is supposedly fine with that.

      ----

      --

      ----
      Open mind, insert foot.
    2. Re:Is Mike leaving NetScape or Mozilla? by Ed+Avis · · Score: 2

      He is leaving AOL/Netscape/Time/Warner.

      --
      -- Ed Avis ed@membled.com
    3. Re:Is Mike leaving NetScape or Mozilla? by thimo · · Score: 2

      (Deja vu) So he's going to work for Transmeta, right? Does that mean we get a programmable PDA processor running Linux and Mozilla? Whoop!!!

      Imagine a beowolf... (shouldn't have said that)

      Thimo
      --

      --
      Avoid the Gates of Hell. Use Linux!
  10. Re:Mike Shaver Leaving Mozilla by Matts · · Score: 2

    Mozilla just flew over you and posted this comment. I have it flying quite happily for hours at a time here. Has great HTML support, great Javascript/DHTML support, full Java support. It's lacking a few things that can't be put in (like some plugins and SSL), but overall it's looking pretty darn fine. And the widgets (gtk) are a whole lot nicer than Communicator's too. :)

    --

    Matt. Want XML + Apache + Stylesheets? Get AxKit.
  11. Re:Mike Shaver Leaving Mozilla by NicolasC · · Score: 2

    Hmm. Actually, it does not seem to me that the reason why he is leaving is clear - at least, not from the article mentioned or from any of the comments that I've been able to read. JWZ left because he thought that Mozilla had been more a failure than a success (source: his web site) and did not have fun anymore working for a big corporation. At least, that's what I understood from what he said on the subject.

    In some sense, the critiques that applied to Mozilla on April, 1st 99 (when jwz left) still more or less apply today: the product is not in a deliverable state. I mean, it's an alpha release, with various degrees of stability depending on the environment you're running it on, and that's definitely not a deliverable. Not yet, at least.

    I don't contribute to the project by lack of time (insert your favorite excuse here) and because I'm not a good enough coder to participate in such a big project, where the code base is so huge and complex.

    But I have a hard time understanding why Mozilla takes so long to take off when something like Linux or Free BSD, whose source code size is probably bigger than Mozilla's (correct me if I'm wrong), are still very active. It's definitely not the lack of people, or the lack of skills, but I'd like to understand where it comes from.

    Complexity/messiness of the source? Communication problems? Lack of support from Netscape (that was one of JWZ's rants)? Or something else?

    In short: what I get from this is that Open Source is not the solution to all of our problems. Sometimes, it doesn't work very well. At least, not as well as it could. And Mozilla seems to be an example of that, unfortunately.

    Cheers,

  12. Re:Shaver and jwz are evil for open source movemen by Mike+Shaver · · Score: 2
    I wish I could take my option money and retire, to be honest. I'm not sure that I would do it, but I won't lie and tell you that I dread being financially independent. The only thing that I'm going away from right now is my current employer, and I certainly plan to stay involved with Mozilla as long as I'm wanted.

    If you think I'm not a good open source evangelist, I can't really disagree; I must not have evangelized to you very well at all, though I was certainly trying harder to make Mozilla look good than to make myself look good. (That's the easier task, of course: Mozilla's a lot more lovable than I am.)

    As for nights and nationality, people familiar with the project know what hours I work, and from where.

    I'm honoured to be grouped with Jamie, though -- he's a fine evangelist indeed. (Even when he makes me cry.)

  13. Unashamed Rumormill Grinding by Oliver+Lineham · · Score: 2
    Mike Shaver said: I've been asked by my new employer to not disclose the details of where I'm going next, but I should be able to say more in the next little while. Suffice it to say that I'm quite excited about it.

    ..He'll probably be the next person to disappear into the shadowy halls of Transmeta.. :)
    ---

    --
    -- mind over pixel