Slashdot Mirror
Childhood's End
Childhood's End was Clarke's fourth novel and is one of the books on which his career is founded. It was originally published in 1953 and republished with an introduction and a radically altered first chapter in 1990. It is a novel of visitation by aliens and the vast changes in humanity which result. Of course, many science fiction stories of every vintage could be summarised identically. Clarke displays his awareness of this early in the book when he outlines many of the alternative paths the novel could take and dismisses these possibilities. The story told is profound in comparison with much of the science fiction which had come before. However, the preconceptions which the modern reader is likely to have of this author will jar with the tale told. The original edition states that "the opinions expressed in this book are not those of the author". From reading his new introduction, it would appear that Clarke's subsequent development has distanced him from an even larger proportion of those opinions.
The first chapter discusses the coming of the aliens. The original version posits a space race between the Soviets and America entering the final stages of take off for the moon when alien spaceships appear in the sky. At the time of publication, the setting is clearly twenty years in the future. Because it is also clearly now in our past, Clarke has updated this with a prelude involving Russian and American co-operation for a Mars mission. The subsequent story is unchanged. Having read the original version, I feel that the new-grafted root might make the story even more dated in it's handling of emotion and interrelation between the sexes. However, perhaps these simply form part of the story environment for a reader unfettered by knowledge of the book's antiquity.
After the scene-setting arrival, events skip forward several years to describe the consolidation of the new order. The alien Overlords put backbone into the United Nations and bring about a genuine world government with widespread peace and prosperity despite fears regarding the nature of the aliens, who refuse to reveal themselves. This is followed by a time where humanity, under guidance, transforms the planet into a utopia. The populace of this new era is faced with the question of what to do next. The answers offered by the Overlords are as unpalatable as the physical form of the aliens would have been at the time of their arrival.
The structure of the novel reaches this point without faltering greatly. However, the requirement for continued human narrative is fractured by Einsteinian physics and by the paranormal. The author's desire to escape from the confines of Earth and offer a greater perspective complicate the story but offer intimations of the future awaiting the human race. This future is developed through paranormal mechanisms and disappears into realms undescribable, providing a lyricism at odds with much of the rest of the novel. The characters are often stilted and rather formal. Even in the worst extreme, their emotional life is considerably less interesting than their intellectual activity. The book almost overflows with ideas, making it "archealogically" interesting: it's influence can be sifted from much work of subsequent generations, from 'V' to The X Files. . This contributes to the reading experience but it is not a gripping book. Childhood's End will be worthwhile principally to those interested in the history of science fiction and the development of one of it's leading authors.
Unofficial Arthur C. Clarke homepage: http://www.lsi.usp.br/~bianchi/clarke/
You can purchase this book at fatbrain.
Whew. You seem to be stressed. May I suggest the Doctor in emacs. It's most helpful. Granted it blames everything on your parents, but we all do that anyway...
"Sir, I'd stake my reputation on it."
"Kryten, you haven't got a reputation."
Like all his other great book this is a must read. Its very much relevant now except for some details. the major point in this book is the evolution of a new species from humans which makes us irrelevant in the grand order. Today with advancement in genetic engineering its a possibility even though its remote.
It annoys me when authors feel the need to change fiction to take account of real world progress. Why not leave the book as it was, as an artifact of it's time? That would fit better with the tone of the rest of the book anyway.
It's almost as bad as TV and movie adaptations of, say, Sherlock Holmes stories, when they place them in the present.This was one of the first "real" sci-fi books I read. (Up until I read it at age 12, I was 100% pure fantasy) It was and continues to be one of the major factors in my love of sci-fi!
Myddrin
Childhood's End is my favorite Clarke's novel, and that's not a small thing. I fear the reviewer simply read the book with the wrong perspective. To his criticisms, I offer one simple answer: that's not what the book is about.
(8-DCS)
> The characters are often stilted and rather formal. Even in the worst extreme, their emotional
:-) ).
life is considerably less interesting than their intellectual activity.
Much the same could be said for all of Clarke's fiction, no one would compare him with Heinlein in style. If anything, "Childhood's End" was Clarke at his most readable, in other work one almost forgets that there *are* any characters. This book also prefigures an idea that would recur in "2001", that humanity might be responsible to a destiny not of its own making (and this from an atheist!
One of my favorites.
---------------------
---------------------
John 3:16 - God's Public License
Childhood's End would make a great movie if it was done well. I think there were discussions between Clarke and a director about ten years ago, but it didn't go anywhere. Does anyone know of recent plans for a movie ?
AC always has problems expressing his visions.
;-)
;-). If he manages to express one of his visions well and write a really good book, that book always has a second and a third to followup until it is completely dry. 2001, 2010, 2061, 3001... Yeah right ;-)
;-)
This is one of the better books by Arthur C. Clarke. The reson being that it does not have a second and a third part
There is a good joke running around about him. In one of his rama books he sais that the creators of rama have done everything three times. Well so does he
Overall, though definitely a visionary and definitely a remarcable sci-fi figure, he has never had the brilliance of Bradbury, Simak and from the newer ones P. Hamilton and Iain M. Banks.
I can think of only one of his books that falls out of this rule of thumb. This is the now well forgotten Fountains of Paradise. It is brilliant, has an idea and does not have a Fountains II, Fountains III (The retrun of Fountains) and Fountains 3001 - The final flow
Well, opinion on books are personal so
#include
Baker's Law: Misery no longer loves company. Nowadays it insists on it
http://www.sigsegv.cx/
Generally in HS lit classes, you don't walk away having learned something, or having been profoundly affected.
Thankfully, I took the sci-fi class that was offered, and read the following literary gems:
1. childhoods end
2. fahrenheit 451
3. brave new world
4. 1984 (optional extra credit)
it should have been a class in politics! I learned more from those books about societal skepticism, and conformity than in my US gov't class.
childhood's end also had me reading more Clarke books later on, with the Rama series now being my favorite...
highly suggested reading!
Q: What do you think about American Culture?
A: I think it's a good idea.
(adapted from Gandhi)
Ever see the twilight zone where the aliens come to earth, bring about peace and prosperity on earth, and then start taking humans back to their planet for food? ...
sorry, the storyline just reminded me of that episode.
You have just taken the troll oath of allegiance to the Slashdot site. Of allegiance to whom? Of allegiance to no one, unless it be the Llama. May we worship the Camel too? :-)
I would have to say that this book was definately a product of the fifties. Many aspects of the book played upon the fears and oddities of American culture in that era. There was the beginnings of many movements that have gained more momentum or died out referenced in the book. For instance, the very beginning of the book included a scene wherein viewers of a bullfight felt the wounds inflicted upon a bull. This references animal rights movements that were becoming more mainstream in this time period. There are a lot of other political references in this book.
One thing I would like to say, is that I don't think it is a good idea to try to move this book into the future with a new opening chapter. It is better viewed as a piece of science fiction in the time period for which it was written. The concepts built into it reflect a great deal on cold war mentalities, and the social structures of the time. In particular, it shows that our beliefs, irrational fears, and "The bad guys" are very much products of our society and media. There is nothing like the demonic appearance of the overlords and the strong Communist impression given of the Overmind to show that Clarke was trying to show people that good and bad are very relative. I am not sure if Clarke was a Communist, or was just trying to tick off that psychopath McCarthy.
When you try to take this book out of the fifties, it quickly ceases to make as much sense. The book was designed to shock people in a time of prosperity and mild close-mindedness into thinking a bit more about their predjudices and beliefs.
B. Elgin
B. Elgin
"Read at your own risk; feel free to ignore."
This book has pretty good twist regarding the appearance of the aliens. I am not going to tell you, because I think you should find out yourself. If you liked Sixth Sense twist, you'd definitely love this.
The other really insightful book by Arthur C. Clarke is City and the Stars.
If you like Sri Lanka ( as I do ), and would like to read a book based on Sri Lanka, try Fountains Of Paradise. I don't know how scientifically viable space elevators are, but it is a good read.
My favorite is still his very first professional story published in 1946, Rescue Party. If you haven't read it, find it in one of his anthologies. It's great!
I won't spoil the surprise, but I remember his introduction to the story saying something like "Many have commented about the human-chauvinist thrill that many get from reading this story. This perhaps tells more about the human race than we want to know.
Another (paraphrased) quote was, "Many have commented that this is their favorite story of mine. This is getting a cooler and cooler reception as the years go by." :)
---
I really enjoyed Childhoods End . It's not the "perfect" novel, but I found it an enjoyable read, and a book that had some interesting points to make. I'd give it an 8/10.
My favorite book by Arthur C. Clarke would have to be a more recent (and fairly unsung) work of his, The Songs of Distant Earth . I strongly recommend it.
----
----
Open mind, insert foot.
Arthur C. Clarke is a really good author. I've read just about everything he've done, and most of it is just excellent. If you'd ask me he had his best days in the late 60's through to the early 70ies when he published 2001 (read the book to understand the film!) and Rendezvouz with Rama.
Arthur C. Clarke is also a rather cool person. He were using global computer communication long before WWW and such. Add to all this that he really knows what he's writing about, as he has some sort of Ph.D (not sure in what, but he was one was involved in the early development of the Radar).
// Simon
I would caution everyone reading this review to consider the meaning of good sci-fi versus books written for entertainment. True sci-fi is deeper, and the world it presents is there to make a point, not to 'wow' you into buying a sequel.
Childhood's End is a gem, in the true sci-fi genre. As is Wells' Time Machine. TM is laughable by modern entertainment standards, but the subject matter is arguably more true now than when it was first written.
TM was written in the social context of the industrial revolution, and it's a cautionary tale which speculates on what may be is the industrial-age haves and have-nots continue on their then-existing paths. We have a similar have/have-not situation now, in the industrial age. Most of us 'haves' map well to the Wellesian Morlocks. Think about it.
Childhood's End was written at a time of high tension between the US and the USSR. We were trying to out do one another, and the race to the moon was a good way to posture superiority. The fact was, we were itching for a fight, but couldn't afford one considering the nuclear repercussions.
The arrival of the Overlords, their power and complete subjugation of the world's authority over it's percieved/chosen destiny was a crushing blow to mankind as portrayed in the book. This is where the formality of interactions comes from. We were afraid of being controlled, we couldn't fight back, we had to behave 'well'.
All the while we were treated well, all our problems were taken care of, and we had time for leisure. Consider Maslow's pyramid of needs... Kerellian (Care Alien) and the Overlords created conditions ripe for our spontaneous maturation. By solving our problems for us, they allowed us to make our transcendence into Adulthood.
The story is brilliant. The bitter irony of the alien's true form, and mission. Their role in the elevation of humanity out of Childhood. Knowing our fate and knowing that they were charged with our fruition. Knowing their own full potential.
Read the original book, not the revision. Clarke foresaw a great number of modern day items. (somehow he missed the personal computer though)
Also, keep in mind religion, and Shelly's Mont Blanc.
I tried to not give anything away. Really, I did.
-- What you do today will cost you a day of your life.
I have to disagree with this review of Childhood's End. It has been a couple years since I last read it (maybe this review will spur me on to do so again :), but I think the book deserves more credit than the reviewer gives it. Although the science is not in any way accurate, I don't feel Childhood's End is meant to be Hard SF. Rather, it is 'people' SF, dealing with how changes we cannot grasp affect our society, how each generation changes, and an interesting look at the end of 'humanity,' but not the human race.
I am somewhat disturbed to learn of the alteration of the story, however. I have always respected my all time favorite SF author, Ray Bradbury, for consistently refusing to alter his works, even as elements within them become dated.
-- 'As it all washes away you know -- as it all is one, no one is alone.' -Cosmic Disorder
It's a book about aliens landing, a literary tradition going back to The War of the Worlds. It's unique in that the aliens just don't care. They neither love us nor hate us; at best, they feel a certain distant benevolence. Humanity doesn't matter very much; at best, it's just another one of many races that will evolve to the next stage, and at worst, it's a cancer to be expunged.
This is actually a frequent theme of Clarke's work, and it may be his greatest single contribution to speculative fiction. Most authors write about humanity as if it matters; Clarke repeatedly rubs our face in the fact that we don't matter on a universal scale. We only matter to ourselves.
There's actually an interesting historical note here. I'd wager that almost nobody reading this would admit to having ever read any significant body of work directly influenced by Existentialism. That's not true: the conflict in Childhood's End, and, more importantly, in Sentinel and 2001 is exactly the Existentialist dilemma: how can one act well in a world where one does not matter.
And the next time somebody sneers at you for your taste in literature, point that out to them. Eat you heart out, Jean-Paul Sartre!
Clarke's big theme in his writing was the transformation of humanity and the dawn of higher states of being. Childhood's end is one of the earlier of his books to explore the theme. He also did the first story about the global communications network becoming sentient one it has a certain number of switches acting like neurons.
One warning about Clarke: his novels sometimes drag, as they are written around ideas, not people. For this reason, I recommend trying some of his collections of short stories instead. Expedition to Earth , Tales from the White Hart , and Reach for Tomorrow are all great books. If you can find it, Out of the Sun is another nice collection of cold war stories, but I think it's out of print.
Jon
All opinions expressed herein are my own, and not those of my employers, who are appalled.
Rendezvous with Rama - definitely my favorite of Clarke's. Really captured the mystery & adventure of exploring an alien starship.
To bad the sequels were so bad...Never write any thing with Gently Lee again
The world isn't run by weapons anymore, or energy, or money. It's run by little ones and zeroes, little bits of data.
Too bad The Man (tm), represented by the major studios, would never make such a movie without ripping its heart out, stomping on it, and shoving it down the throat of Arthur Clark.
It would have to be an indie film.
-- My comment is above.
I read a lot of science fiction, and I read Childhood's End a couple of years ago. I honestly can't remember anything about the book except the basic plot.
Clarke is overrated as an author. He's an IDEA man, not a writer.
I just want to say Childhood's End is one of my two favorite books (up there with Atlas Shrugged), the only book I read 14 times so far, and also the only book ever assigned to me in highschool that I actually liked!
A while back I was searching the net for stuff on Childhood's End (like lost chapters, commentary from Sir Arthur C. Clark, etc...) In my travels, I found a few rumors of movie plans! Now *that* would be amazing.
_______
2B1ASK1
My English teacher said it was one of her favorite books, I read it, and I hated it. Science fiction isn't made great by the LSD-trip imagery or how removed from reality it can be, and Childhood's End is sure pretty unrealistic. No characters behave humanly, and the premises the book is based on are in no way a metaphor for anything in the real world. At least I couldn't see anything. Read Asimov instead, he had a bigger ego but he wrote better books.
Just my angry 2 cents.
Check out Project Upper/Mute, an all-around awesome compiler fra
The book is divided into three parts: "Earth and the Overlords", "The Golden Age", and "The Last Generation". Each part presents a different theme, or discusses a different problem, and in fact each part could warrant a book of its own. The presence of all three themes, which are different in nature and quality, in one book makes it a strange mix that leaves an undecided flavor; and yet, all three themes are part of a single plot.
For my complete review of the book, follow this link.- Tal Cohen
In childhood's end... did anyone notice that, first people became so advanced that they would no longer eat whales. But later, when they became REALLY REALLY advanced, they ate the entire world? (Sorry, whales.) (Nevertheless. Still well worth reading.)
I don't know why the reviewer doesn't give this a better score. Personally, it's in my top 10 right up there with king david's spaceship, and battlefield earth
Here's to folks who like to bust their bloodvessels over trivial matters of pride and things they are powerless to change.
Have fun!
I strongly disagree with the above review of _Childhood's End_.
I read _Childhood's End_ while I was flying to the US for the first time having left India to attend graduate school here in the US. I was and am still blown away by _Childhood's End_. While I can't speak for others, to me it is a classic.
One of the reasons why some people may dislike _Childhood's End_ is due to the left turn taken by the book toward mysticism. However, Clarke is simply exploring the consequences of an evolutionary leap from present-day rational human beings to psychic posthumans. I think he does a great job of depicting this evolutionary transformation. Also, his explanation of the devil is IMHO a masterpiece.
This sort of evolutionary transformation taken by humanity is standard fare in mysticism. It was popularized by Teilhard de Chardin and by Aurobindo. In fact Aurobindo's sequence of evolutionary stages---rational, intuitive, psychic, overmind, supermind---may have influenced Clarke since Clarke uses the term overmind to describe the forces controlling the overlord aliens. For a more recent update on these ideas, check out Ken Wilber's _Sex, Ecology and Spirituality; The Spirit of Evolution_.
Anand Rangarajan anand@cise.ufl.edu
You are so mercifully free of the ravages of intelligence. Two words : Reading Comprehension. It will serve you either as a Christian or as a Christian-basher executing a poorly done parody of a Christian.
My sigs generate more comments than my comments. Am I the only one?
---------------------
---------------------
John 3:16 - God's Public License
Really, they're just about the same book, at least thematically. Punctuated evolution. In Clarke's case, the step was much larger, and he had extraterrestrial midwives. In Bear's case, the step was much more moderate, and the drama of the story was driven by the lack of those midwives.
Another excellent "Evolutionary Step" book is "The Harvest" by Robert Charles Wilson. In this case, however, the step is a sort of evolution by nano-tech absorption. Then this idea leads you back to Greg Bear, with "Blood Music".
The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
The real book you should have reviewed was 2010. I know... I know... a sequel. Contrary to what some are saying about Clarke some his sequels are better than the original. But Childhood's End is just a short story.
Try "The City and the Stars" or "Rendezvous With Rama", that was some great storytelling. He also just wrote one called "The Trigger" that looks interesting.
I think maybe a lot of people who read Sci-Fi expect to read a book version of a Sci-Fi movie (ugh), complete with explosions.
Hint:Good Sci-Fi is not about happy endings like "Independence Day"! It's all about Ideas!
Linux is only free if your time has no value. Windows is only free if you threaten to use Linux.
The thing I like about Childhood's End is the really clever ideas in it. The people in the book give up on religion and anything not "reasonable", and go over to rationality and "science" only. And that is their undoing. Clarke is pointing out that True science doesn't condemn religion or the paranormal (though it may discount it); it condemns what is proven false.
Clarke is also a very good futurist. Right after WWII he kept petitioning congress to put orbitting radios in space (communications satellites). He was consistently laughed down. So he wrote a story in which the Russians listened to him, and through very subtle propaganda would be able to win the US over. (This story is a short, and is in the anthology Nine Billion Names of God)
Anyways, the comparison to Bradbury and Heinlein is ridiculous. Bradbury was always too much in love with writers and writing (like JonKatz with technology :-) ). Heinlein was usually very preachy about his moral ideas, and didn't let the story flow freely (although I do like a few of his stories). And Asimov was always caught up in the game of Logic. So though Clarke is flawed, so are all the others.
I have to agree on Kadath, one of the finest plain-ol-fiction stories I can recall. Vibrant imagery, and none of the 'formula' of modern-day fiction.
I highly recommend Lovecraft's At The Mountains of Madness too.
I was not all that crazy about Childhood's End when I last read it. It was ok, but not all of Clarke's stuff really fires my rocket. Likewise 2061 (the sequel to 2001 and 2010) left me cold. Rama was incredible.
-- There is no truth. There is only Perception. To Percieve is to Exist.
This (along with many Clarke books) is a favorite of mine. The question I have has something to do with one of the last lines in (the original) book.
;) )
When the alien overlord finally reveals himself, the book says that he was a figure out of earth's past and mythology. I got the general impression that he was supposed to be the basis for the talse of dragons. Is this impression correct, or did I miss something? (and if so, what
Who am I?
Why am here?
Where is the chocolate?
What is your Slash Rating?
I wonder how many other people thought of "Childhood's End" when they first saw the movie Independence Day? ID4 had an almost perfect visualization of the image in my mind of the huge alien starship appearing over New York City. I got shivers during the trailer.
Read a good book lately?
Read a good book lately?
In particular, his construction of a synthetic diamond tower into LEO. In recent years he has observed that fullerene tubules would likely be a better building material than diamond filament.
I wonder if it was this concept (in particular, the test of unspooling the filament from a spacecraft in LEO) that caused NASA to attempt the same sort of test a few years ago. (Don't remember when, or what the filamentthey used was, sorry)
Who am I?
Why am here?
Where is the chocolate?
What is your Slash Rating?
This is truly a classic. It's not particularly science fiction. It's more in the line of "What can fact and science be used for in the construction of a tale?" The character of Purvis is perfectly suited for this, since you never quite know if he's pulling your leg, and then one day he disappears under odd circumstances. The best part is the story about the UFO-ologist who finds the White Heart--and gives Purvis his due :)
Who am I?
Why am here?
Where is the chocolate?
What is your Slash Rating?
The most satisfying part of the book is reading the "denouement" that comes not at the end, but in the middle of the book when the aliens' physical appearance is revealed after decades of concealment. The reason for the concealment (which I don't want to give away here) is quite clever, thought provoking and original. Like a good mystery, there's growing suspense and anticipation, yet once the secret is revealed, all the previous comments fit into
place.
The book is a little unusual for standard sci-fi in its tribute to a previous literary-philosophical strand of thought developed by a popular American author in the 1800s, Ralph Waldo Emerson. The end of the book is not primarily about "paranormal" themes as the reviewer states, its really a sci-fi exploration of trancendentalist themes, the joint-consciousness of the "overmind". Few sci-fi books provide interesting, original depictions of religious concepts, and this is one of them.
--LP
"Childhood's End" sung by Dave Gilmour on Obscured By Clouds is a favorite of mine. A really haunting little piece.
So that's why people keep telling me to "grow up".
It was one of the few science fiction books in my high school library so I picked it up and tried to read it. I fell asleep. Coincidinkly, I just saw the book again - while cleaning up my basement! Library police? (Seinfeld)
Can we get a book review of Journey to the Center of Earth? How about Frankenstein? Hey I know what we need a review of: Beowulf! How about the fucking Illiad?
I'm sure we can find something that I didn't read at 9, 20 years ago.
All three favorites of mine too. I got my start in SF on Arthur Clarke books (it didn't hurt he had the same first name as me - I was only about 8 or 10 when I started reading them!) and he's still my favorite author. A lot of people know him through 2001 - I didn't see or read that until much, much later. I think The City and the Stars is still my favorite of his; both it and Childhood's End were the kind of book that afterwards I put down and just sat, thinking, for quite some time. Profound.
People criticize Clarke's characters - but I think like a lot of good SF, the plot ideas take the place of the human characters in carrying the story forward, and I really don't have a problem with that. The later Rama books were pretty horrible though...
Energy: time to change the picture.
This book was interesting, not terribly gripping as a storyteller, but thoughtprovoking. After I read this book (I had already read 2001 series), it seemed like there was no point in reading more of Clarkes stories -- the theme is essentially always the same. Clark sees humans fading away - he is fascinated by the idea that a whole new level of intelligence can exist that is as far beyond us as we (presumably) are to rats. 2001 is essentially the same, but more obfuscated and therefore more effective -> the media (confusion of the reader) is the message (hopeless confusion of people in general w.r.t the "new intelligence"). (Also to keep the reader in awe -- he tries to prevent you from thinking about the details, on the grounds that you would not understand them. This limits exploration of this theme, however.)
I never particularly admired Clarke's long works. However his short stories including Tales From the White Hart and of course the famous Sentinel are terrific.
If you want a really good classic sci-fi novel of the same era you should read Clifford Simak's City. It is far more worthy than Childhood's End.
in childhood's end, a.c.clarke came really close to depicting the aliens as i had always imagined them: detached entities. i wish he had kept them disembodied until the end of the book instead of revealing their physical properties to us. we -- humans, i think, are excessively concerned with the physical, the body. the u.f.o. enthusiasts are impatiently awaiting the arrival of the silvery space ship fleet over the manhattan sky-line. in giving the aliens physical attributes, a.c.clarke falls into the pitfall..
I apologize if I give anything away.
I read this book as a junior-high kid, and it had a few profound impacts on me:
The simplicity with which the various human evils were eliminated by the Overlords sent the message that so much of our suffering is caused by irrational traditions and shallow beliefs, and
The picture of the Overmind at the end depressed me so greatly (and, I think, was meant to -- that's why we had the astronaut's perspective?) that I have since always carried around the idea that the Christian depiction of Heaven really isn't that appealing -- a life of struggle and torment is far more appealing than "paradise", because it brings real meaning to whatever joy and discovery might be experienced.
One last thing: if you've read Rendezvous with Rama, you must conclude that Clarke intended the second lesson in Childhood's End, as Rama is a celebration of the wonder of an accidental experience that vanishes without impact, and a warning of the danger of focusing on the destination to the exclusion of noticing the journey (after all, the aliens came all that way, and never imagined or noticed the puny Earthlings).
Thanks for the review. This book deserves to be read and remembered.
"You can't get something for nothing." - my grandfather, on the stock market and Reaganomics.
What we have to remember is that Clarke doesn't
write about things where the emotional lives of
the (human) characters are very important. So
it's a damn good thing that he doesn't clutter
the book with it. Herman Hesse writes about
almost nothing _but_ the characters' emotions
which is good too, for the same reason.
I agree with the other commenter that looking
for protagonists is not very satisfying sport
with Clarke. In 2001 I have to say HAL is NOT
the protagonist, he might be the only fully
developed character, but he is a sideshow. 2001
is about apes, humans and aliens. In this way
Bowman and Moonwatcher are the only protagonists,
even though Bowman neither is really a developed
character.
As for you view of Childhoods end being about the
Overlords, that is an good idea. Never really
thought about it that way, but yes the book
is a bit broader than I thought it was.