Slashdot Mirror


Jon Katz' "Geeks" Goes Hollywood

ChrisCrosby was the first to notice that Hollywood Reporter has a story about our own Jon Katz' soon-to-be-released book "Geeks" being picked up by New Line Cinema for a feature film. Lawrence Bender (producer of Pulp Fiction, Reservoir Dogs, Good Will Hunting and more) and Laurie Bickford are producing. I'm really excited for Jon, and I just wanted to congratulate him: He's been working so hard on this, and the parts of the story that I've read have been really wonderful. And Hemos and I get cameos! Now since Bender has produced all of Quentin Tarantino's films, wouldn't it be fabulous if he directed this?Update: 01/14 04:09 by H : BTW, the actual book is available for pre-order through ThinkGeek. Check it out.

61 of 256 comments (clear)

  1. Cameos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

    How can you do a cameo?! I have never even seen your face!

    Vote for Linus doing the cameo! At least someone can recognize HIM!

  2. Jon Katz by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

    It's quite amazing how a persons image can shine high above their abilities. Since Jon Katz is a self professed source for all that is worthy in technology news, that makes him a prime example for what I'm saying. Although Jon Katz seems to be well educated, his written skills leave something to be desired. As many have pointed out his writing style is trite and not creative. One get's the feeling that he does this to boost his already inflated public image, and in so doing keeping the dollar signs rolling in. It's hard to blame him though, money can make people do strange things. Best of luck your endevours Mr. Katz as I'm sure you know exactly what it is you're doing.

    1. Re:Jon Katz by eshaft · · Score: 2

      He's obviously a very opinionated writer, and that's what also screws him in the end - you've got to back yourself up as a writer, you can't just rail against everyone and anyone and expect people to understand what the heck you're talking about. But that's no reason to dis him like everyone's doing. It's just part of the Hollywood infrastructure that the sensationally trite stuff floats to the top, like terds jingling around the surface of a toiletbowl.

      *lol*

      --
      lf.o
    2. Re:Jon Katz by slashdot-terminal · · Score: 2

      It's quite amazing how a persons image can shine high above their abilities. Since Jon Katz is a self professed source for all that is worthy in technology news, that makes him a
      prime example for what I'm saying. Although Jon Katz seems to be well educated, his written skills leave something to be desired. As many have pointed out his writing style is
      trite and not creative. One get's the feeling that he does this to boost his already inflated public image, and in so doing keeping the dollar signs rolling in. It's hard to blame him
      though, money can make people do strange things. Best of luck your endevours Mr. Katz as I'm sure you know exactly what it is you're doing.


      Why all this emphasis on what we term "creativity"? There eventually comes a time when all literary forms become trite and obsolete and boring. The only thing left after about 1950 that was absolutely really new and groundbreaking in terms of literature was perhaps random groups of text that meant nothing; and even that can be done in emacs with the dissociated press program. Just because this guy is probably as old as my father and that he has a very traditional concept of what the future is dosn't mean that his opioion is crap. I mean if you look at things like The Wizard of Oz (basically a kind of projection about what the future city would look like) you can see this in action. How about old crappy science fiction things. There is no chance that people will ever do anything in such a tacky manner.

      --
      Slashdot social engineering at it's finest
    3. Re:Jon Katz by slashdot-terminal · · Score: 2

      What I was trying to point out is that the way Jon Katz presents his ideas is trite and not creative. One of the many so-called "no-no's" of writing is the use of cliches. Cliches are,
      by definition, trite. An example of a cliche is: "Tears streamed down her face". You could rephrase this to make it non-cliche: "Tears spasmed over the boundaries of her eye lids,
      cascading down the trecherous terrain of her face". Do you consider the second one more creative? I do.


      Well the mental image of the first seems to be a tender one perhaps evoking sympathy more. The second is indeed creative but it just seems more to concentrate on the physical features of the person in question. Perhaps the second would be good perhaps if the person in question had just fallen down a hill or perhaps we are attempting to impart some sense of the tramatic nature of the event that the tears are being produced for. Not all cliches are bad. If you read a great deal of romance novels I am sure that the first would be perhaps a cliche. But what if you are exposed to say classical literature? How can you effectively judge something to be a cliche? What happens if we run out of effective methods of describing the act of crying? Well in English we have at least one method in creating a continum of words in severity or emotional impact. Consider the act of crying.

      We have:

      1. watering eyes -- perhaps slight crying
      2. crying -- the actual act itself without too much
      3. sobbing -- more intense than crying and involves more emphasis.
      4. bawling -- more "earthy" generally used to refer to "simple" people or situations less human

      Those 4 examples are the only ones that I can come up without stepping too deeply into the metaphor but as you can see there are ways to do it but even the cliche is still necessary to give that sensation.

      --
      Slashdot social engineering at it's finest
    4. Re:Jon Katz by slashdot-terminal · · Score: 2

      Quite. The Katz PR machine is on overdrive: a reality check is essential, for which see the following:


      Is there anything better? Could andover afford these people? Come on this isn't Time or US News and World Report or even Variety this is an internet site and because of this and it's theme "News for Nerds: Stuff that Matters" we have a rather low selection because this isn't a trade magazine or anything like that. I think the more information that is posted to slashdot the better in terms of idea flow. The flow ideas is what created the open source movement and it is the only thing preventing it's demise. I would really like to see someone (from slashdot that is) produce an essay on the same topic as John Katz and have people judge if it is better. I don't think it's as easy as it looks.

      PS. (And no random perl scripts that use syntastic english grammer parsers to recreate not so funny combinations of "essays" are only funny for about 2.567334 minutes exactly).

      --
      Slashdot social engineering at it's finest
  3. I coulda been a star! by Indomitus · · Score: 2

    I spoke to John for awhile about being interviewed for this book. He was going to fly out and put me in there but it never happened. I think he wanted to focus more on geeks whose lives were saved by their "geekiness" or something. I'm just a "normal" geek I guess, never had to program to feed my family and wasn't really bullied in school (the fact that I'm 6'1" and have the physique of an offensive lineman probably helped that) so I never knew how interesting I would have been anyway. Oh well, now I'll just have to get famous on my accomplishments instead of just because I'm a geek. :)

  4. Forget 'movie review'... by Chris+Johnson · · Score: 2
    Expect several MAKING OF articles. Like at least three, touching on how empowering it is for these poor obscure computer geeks to be lifted out of the drab and unrewarding surroundings of... well, reality... and immortalized, thanks to Jon Katz, in images from Hollywood!

    *gag*

    Seriously, what the hell is going on here? I'm not so concerned with Taco and Hemos et al, they're just running a site and having a great time seeing what trouble they can stir up. I'm shocked (and some would say I shouldn't be) by what Katz will go along with.

    Is it in fact true that Jon Katz is exactly the type of corrosive media trendy powerworshipper he purports to be against?

    Does he have rationalizations already in place about how he's not really leveraging his new-media connections to gain special privileges with the very same corporate media dinosaur he claims to hate and fear?

    Which would he choose, to have his film carefully sterilized to be suitable for general audiences, or to have 'his people' sneak children into theaters to see his film?

    *sigh* really, this whole business is disgusting. I would have no gripe with Katz doing this if he was sincere in his desire to align himself with the existing power structures of media that so many of us have to fight against. But he is not- something is wrong with his mind, that he can't see the phenomenal hypocrisy of his actions and desires.

    I'm looking at Jon's reaction to the AOL/Time Warner merger, and it's bitterly funny how the whole first paragraph is bitching not about social issues, or the media implications, but the gripes of a _disgruntled_ _consumer_. And then, the relevance... "Is individualism, free expression, diverse opinion advanced when the information economy breaks down into two or three "old and new" media conglomerates that control virtually all of the archived news and entertainment information online, and increasingly, the means to deliver it?"

    Well, Jon, never mind that, eh? Which one of the media conglomerates do you like the best for your movie? It's true that taking an option doesn't mean squat in the biz, and the movie may never be made- but as we watch you dance with big media, first Amazon now the film industry in your ever-broadening search for an audience that will accept you as their guru, it's impossible to overlook some things now.

    If your dream continues, you may continue to mouth the same words you've been reciting for years, and you may continue to make a pretense of outrage against corporatism and big media: but the truth will be this: You are not only supporting corporatism and big media... let me spell it out.

    You. Are. In. Their. Pay.

    Traitor.

  5. I wonder how they'll modify it... by Erskin · · Score: 2
    It will be interesting to have read articles directly from Katz himself, and have the real book open to examine, and then compare them to the actual movie produced. It could be a real chance to reverse engineer the "Hollywood filter".

    Regardless, congradulations, Jon. Well done, sir.

    --

    --

    Erskin
    geek.

  6. Re:Do you know what the funny thing about /. is? by slim · · Score: 2

    "Type rm -rf /, once more, motherfucker. I dare ya, I double dare ya."

    "Big KahunaLinux? That's that new Hawaiian RedHat variant, isn't it?"

    I now declare the Pulp Fiction parodies over...
    (if only t'were true)
    --

  7. I've read it... by moonboy · · Score: 2

    I've read an early release version of it and really liked it. I was very insightful and I saw a lot of myself in the characters. A BIG CONGRATULATIONS! to Jon. Job well done. Thanks also for the early release book. I give it 5 penguins out of 5.

    ----------------

    "Great spirits have always encountered violent opposition from mediocre minds." - Albert Einstein

    --

    Co-founder and designer at Music Nearby: http://musicnearby.com
  8. This is an interesting example of "media synergy" by jht · · Score: 2

    I do not mean to disparage anything or anyone here - I'm a faithful /.er, and I actually enjoy most of Katz's stuff. Here's where the "synergy" lies:

    Katz writes for Slashdot. He also writes books. Slashdot features Katz's book as coming out RSN. This is good. And there may be a movie, with bit parts for the fellows who run Slashdot. Also neat.

    Tacked on at the end of the article is an opportunity to pre-order the book from ThinkGeek, a cool online store that just happens to be owned by Slashdot's parent - Andover.net. So Andover, Slashdot, and ThinkGeek have turned an interesting story into a revenue opportunity. This is the future, folks - get used to it.

    There's nothing wrong with cross-selling within your properties, but you'll see a lot more of it from companies a lot less trustworthy than Andover. Be prepared.

    That said, congratulations, Jon. I'll be one of the first to buy a copy when it comes out!

    - -Josh Turiel

    --
    -- Josh Turiel
    "2. Do not eat iPod Shuffle."
  9. Re:My new book by HP+LoveJet · · Score: 2

    Not bad, but how about:

    "Terse: The gratuitously sententious explication of an undeniable superfluity of informational concepts best reserved for the interior surface of the pressed wood pulp integument hereof."

    --
    spawn_of_yog_sothoth
  10. Re:Do you know what the funny thing about /. is? by Peale · · Score: 2

    It's the little differences. A lotta the same news we got here they got there,
    but there they're little different.


    Example? (8

    I'm sorry. What I meant to say was 'please excuse me.'
    what came out of my mouth was 'Move or I'll kill you!'

  11. Re:Congrats With A Question by chromatic · · Score: 2

    Here's a US Census report showing that Idaho had the third largest percentage growth in population from 1990 through 1999. The news outlets of the Treasure Valley (which includes Boise, Meridian, Nampa, and Caldwell) continually report surveys and studies showing that the area is growing at a phenomenal rate -- but I hadn't found any links to those yet.

    Don't forget, the low population density, clean air, wide open spaces, and outdoor recreation make this (and other Western states besides California) seem like paradise to disenchanted high-tech workers who have money and jobs to offer.

    --

  12. Re:Resevoir Geeks? Pulp Slashdot? by Toddarooski · · Score: 2
    Well, lemme add my own contribution to the "Reservoir Geeks" script...

    JOE: But once again, at the risk of being redundant, if I even think I hear somebody telling or referring to somebody by their Christian name... you won't want to be you. Okay, quickly. (pointing at the men as he gives them a name) Mr. VMS, Mr. X-Windows, Mr. Palm, Mr. BeOS, Mr. Solaris, and Mr. Mac.

    MR. MAC: Why do I gotta be Mr. Mac?

    JOE: 'Cuz you're a wussie.

    MR. MAC: Why can't we pick our own operating systems?

    JOE: I tried that once, it don't work. You get four guys fighting over who's gonna be Mr. Linux. Since nobody knows anybody else, nobody wants to back down. So forget it, I pick. Be thankful you're not Mr. Windows 3.1.

    MR. VMS: Yeah, but Mr. VMS? That's too much like Mr. Penis.

    (Everybody laughs.)

    MR. MAC: Yeah, Mr. Mac sounds like Mr. Macarena. Tell you what, let me be Mr. NextStep. That sounds good to me, I'm Mr. NextStep.

    JOE: You're not Mr. NextStep, somebody from another job's Mr. NextStep. You're Mr. Mac.

    MR. PALM: Who cares what your name is? Who cares if you're Mr. Mac, Mr. NextStep, Mr. FAQ, Mr. Maca...

    MR. MAC: Oh that's really easy for you to say, you're Mr. Palm. You gotta cool-sounding name. So tell me, Mr. Palm, if you think "Mr. Mac" is no big deal, you wanna trade?

    JOE: Nobody's trading with anybody! Look, this ain't a f------ city counsel meeting! Listen up Mr. Mac. We got two ways here, my way or the information superhighway. And you can go down either of 'em. So what's it gonna be, Mr. Mac?

    MR. MAC: Jeez, Joe. F----- forget it. This is beneath me. I'm Mr. Mac, let's move on.

    --

    "Do you expect me to talk?" "No, Mr. Bond. I expect you to die!"

  13. Re:Quentin? by Lord+Kano · · Score: 2

    I'm a geek and I HAVE bitch slapped people, I've also broken bones. So what? Being a geek has NOTHING to do with whether or not you can take care of yourself.

    LK

    --
    "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
  14. Re:Resevoir Geeks? Pulp Slashdot? by jabber · · Score: 2

    "And you will know my name is the root when I bring my vengence upon thee!" - types rm -Rf / &

    Reminds me of Pulp Simpsons. Especially the picture of Homer... "Hmmm, big KARMA burger!!" Oooh! That's FUNNY!! Ahh...

    --

    -- What you do today will cost you a day of your life.
  15. Visualisation by Ivo · · Score: 2

    Hmm..

    a movie about real geeks who 'find a community on the internet'.
    While that could be an interesting story, I wonder how they will be able to visualise it. Are we going to have to look at two geeks surfing and chatting for 90 minutes? :-)

    Greetings,
    Ivo

    1. Re:Visualisation by Corrinne+Yu · · Score: 2

      Yes, please no ultra slow long dorky user interface and CG sequence showing the internet bright lights zooming into each other.

      I gag every time I see that in movies.

      Remeber Jurassic Park: "I know this. This is Unix."

      Yup their "emergency" system is a 3D interface they have to navigate to shut down the darn thing. That is really smart.


      Corrinne Yu
      3D Game Engine Programmer

  16. Microserfs by Nodatadj · · Score: 2

    Whatever happened to the film of Microserfs by D. Coupland? I remember hearing about it, and thinking, "Great book, but it didn't really have an action packed movie storyline"


    But then again, neither did the story of Nick Leeson and it was made into a film.

    1. Re:Microserfs by Nodatadj · · Score: 2

      Oh dear.
      I don't really see Matthew Perry as the nerdy M$ programmer trying to find himself type. Ick

  17. Re:Yes so? by Nodatadj · · Score: 2

    > No I don't think *everyone* wanted it.

    I didn't say that. I said "Seems to enjoy".
    Music and films are all based on trends.
    The trends are followed to make the maximum money.
    It was just a coincidence that there's about 20girl bands all being formed at the same time.
    It was just a coincidence that last summer (UK)
    nearly every movie was a teen highschool romantic comedy (She's al that, 10TIHAY, Never been kissed, American Pie, Election)

    I also never implied it would continue along the same lines, everyone gets bored, the trends change, the movie/music moguls follow where they are lead.

    And most people do buy into the hype.
    QV: The Phantom Menace, Jurassic Park, The Matrix, The Spice Girls, and many many more.

  18. Re:Geez, this seems like typical hollywood fluff by Nodatadj · · Score: 2

    Pander to what the public wants.
    If the public seems to enjoy one prequel released 22 years after the original, then they want every movie to have a prequel released 22years afterwards. If they like "scary" movies that have no visible scary entity, they want all movies to have no visible scary entity.
    If we liked one girl band, then we'll love it when there's 1000 of them

    It's all about money, and trends.






    Unfortunatly.

  19. Good news for Katzdot by Wah · · Score: 2

    How many people die in the book? Will there be nudity? If this thing is touchy feely crap, I'm gonn puke. Hmmm, would Katz write touchy feely crap? aaaah whatever, tgif....

    --
    +&x
    1. Re:Good news for Katzdot by PurpleBob · · Score: 2

      There's got to be nudity and violence, so that it gets an R rating, so that Katz can complain about it and sneak 13-year-olds into the movie theater.
      --

      --
      Win dain a lotica, en vai tu ri silota
  20. Scriptwriting by HerrNewton · · Score: 2

    First, congrats, Jon!

    Now on for the real stuff. I'm sure Katz has sent more than a few people on /. an advanced readers editition. If you've read it, I'm really wondering how they are going to handle the story as Katz himself becomes intertwined with the story. The book isn't written as a third-person narrative; rather, Katz is there. Are we going to see someone playing Katz or are we going to see a rewrite to third-person?

    ----

    --

    ----
    Am I the only one who thinks Microsoft is a misnomer? Perhaps Macrosoft would be a better fit?
  21. Geez, this seems like typical hollywood fluff by senrik · · Score: 2

    I'm sorry, no offense to jon katz or anyone, but haven't we seen this film already. yes, I know that this one hasn't been made yet, but it simply sounds like a rehash of several films, once artistic, now turned into a cliche. I still wanna find a new film that hollywood can do. Enough of the warm and fuzzy crap.

    --
    "the difference between myself and a madman is that I am not mad" -Salvadore Dali
    1. Re:Geez, this seems like typical hollywood fluff by slashdot-terminal · · Score: 2

      What do you want to see done?

      Movies should take advantage of all the actual technology that we have nowadays. Failing that we should have movies that actualy have acturate depictions or proper decision making and perhaps more utilitarian concepts. Take a look at the last ST movie for an example of what you should *not* do. People are not and should not be portrayed as fools. Making them appear to be foolish makes the entire plot less believable.

      Generally you should not let a group of individuals who have little to gain affect the general betterment of the group. In real life such sacrifices do not get anywhere because they are pointless except for allegorical purposes for future generations nothing more.

      --
      Slashdot social engineering at it's finest
    2. Re:Geez, this seems like typical hollywood fluff by slashdot-terminal · · Score: 2

      Do you know something about this book/movie that the rest of us don't? I only ask because all that I know about either is that it's a nonfictional account of two people from Idaho
      who meet over the internet. That's _really_ vague. The only movie that I remember that this even remotely resembles is "You've Got Mail", which better reminds me of "Sleepless
      in Seattle".


      Well that's really not that interesting at all. Geeks by their very nature are not lonely but are a social amalgm between computers and humans. I for one if I had a good enough computer would never leave my house only for the most basic of necessities.

      I can't say that watching a couple of lonely geeks using usenet and e-mail makes for an intriguing plot, though. Nevertheless, I hope that I'm underestimating it.

      Not only that I can't really see a logical group (which I assume most of slashdot is) would actual type of thing. Logic is the norm of the universe so says chaso theory.

      --
      Slashdot social engineering at it's finest
  22. Visualisation of a different sort... by Inoshiro · · Score: 2

    (joke)

    Theoretical situation:
    Enter Jon Katz
    "Hi, I'm Jon Katz, here to introduce my movie. I'll start by briefly discussing how technology affects the many people in society. Why, just recently I was ...."
    Eye's heavy. Can't think.. Sleepy.. fading..
    The geeks fall asleep. The marketters in the audience are enthralled.

    72 minutes later...

    "So that's how I got to work with the cool Slashdot guys. Here's the movie."
    Jon Katz steps to the side to watch the responce.
    A familiar theme song starts up.


    Geeks in audience start to groggily wake.
    "WHAT THE HELL!? This is just Geeks In Space playing! Wait, what's that on the screen..."

    On the screen, an image that is sometimes a mandelbrot set and sometimes a julia set is jiggling through a tunnel like image. It is not anti-aliased, and looks very pixelated.

    "Hey, I recognize that, that's a sonqiue visualisation plugin. That bastard is making money from boring us to tears, and the slashdot crew's own music! And using a pathetic Windows MP3 player with no anti-aliasing.. LET'S GET 'IM!"

    The geeks swarm over Jon, leaving nothing behind but a laptop with a pre-release of Windows 2000 Professional on it. On their way out the theatre, they also start mobbing the marketters in the audience, and incite a few riots around Radio Shack.

    [fin]

    Yeah, so if this movie is just Jon/Mp3 visualisation, we'll be on you like stink on a monkey. We at Echsuh (the Elite Cabal of High School and University Hackers) are not to be toyed with!


    (/joke)

    At-choo :-)
    ---

    --
    --
    Internet Explorer (n): Another bug -- that is, a feature that can't be turned off -- in Windows.
  23. Congrats With A Question by Omicron · · Score: 2

    Congratulations Jon first of all. On a humorous side (read: no flames please :-P) shouldn't the guys be getting royalties from this? I thought the book was about them (kindof). Anyway, like I said, this isn't completely serious :)

    1. Re:Congrats With A Question by slashdot-terminal · · Score: 2

      Katz got snowed by those kids, that's what happened. They fed him some line about how their lives sucked because the only things in Idaho are potato farms, that sugar beet
      plant, and rusty old pickups with shotguns and loud radios tuned to the country music station, and he bought it. I don't know anyone in the area who read the Wired article and
      took it seriously. GASP! It's hard to imagine a mind as sharp as Katz being "snowballed" he's the smartest guy ever ever EVER!!! His writing can ONLY be compared to the bible.
      I mean, both have such strong grasps on LOGIC AND REALITY!


      Like people in the modern age reality is seen in the eye of the beholder. Maybe it *was* reality in the community that those kids lived in. Perhaps they did live in the sticks and it was true. Unless you live there and could relate the actual physical/social/political conditions of the area you cannot say he was snowballed.

      --
      Slashdot social engineering at it's finest
    2. Re:Congrats With A Question by slashdot-terminal · · Score: 2

      Now if the subtitle of the movie is "How a gullible journalist got taken in by a couple of lazy kids who can't find jobs in the 3rd fastest growing area in the U.S.", maybe it'll be
      worth watching as something other than a parody.


      How did Idaho get that rating in the first place? What's the source I wold be quite suprised at this considering the low population density of most of the state and your earlier descriptions of the place being possibly home to large quantities of hillbillies.

      --
      Slashdot social engineering at it's finest
    3. Re:Congrats With A Question by chromatic · · Score: 3

      The book is about those two kids Katz interviewed, huh? I grew up in Idaho, 20 miles from where those kids did. It's not exactly Silicon Valley, but there are a whole lot of technology companies there right now, like HP and Micron and Extended Systems and dozens of smaller firms, as well as the headquarters of other companies like Albertsons and Boise Cascade.

      Katz got snowed by those kids, that's what happened. They fed him some line about how their lives sucked because the only things in Idaho are potato farms, that sugar beet plant, and rusty old pickups with shotguns and loud radios tuned to the country music station, and he bought it. I don't know anyone in the area who read the Wired article and took it seriously.

      Now if the subtitle of the movie is "How a gullible journalist got taken in by a couple of lazy kids who can't find jobs in the 3rd fastest growing area in the U.S.", maybe it'll be worth watching as something other than a parody.

      --

  24. amusing by chinakow · · Score: 2

    I personally like Mr. Katz and his writtings, the part that is amusing is that there are some many people here who seem to dislike him on a personal level and therefore they find it nessacary to blast him for his writing style, what they (the posters) don't realize is that they are still reading his articles and still looking at his views and ideas. so all the people who flame Katz need to realize that no matter what you post about him, he has already won whatever battle you are trying to start, so what I am basicly saying is, if you don't want to hear John Katz, DON'T READ HIS ARTICLES! or better yet write your own essay,get it submited, and see what happens, I would like to see what other people espesecialy those people who have blasted Katz for not being creative or using cliches, write a creative cliche free essay and make it interesting, then start complaing about how other people write essays,

    ok??

    thanks,
    and have a nice day :-)

  25. Yes so? by slashdot-terminal · · Score: 2

    Pander to what the public wants.
    If the public seems to enjoy one prequel released 22 years after the original, then they want every movie to have a prequel released 22years afterwards. If they like "scary" movies that
    have no visible scary entity, they want all movies to have no visible scary entity.
    If we liked one girl band, then we'll love it when there's 1000 of them


    No I don't think *everyone* wanted it. I thought it was a stupid move just for fanatics of the movies in the 70s but I guess that's just me. The future of the world isn't going to change at all it's just what one person decides to do with their time. Why do people always see conspiracies in areas that don't really have the brains to create them? Movie producers and people in the music industry are the last people I would actually credit with anything significant.

    It's all about money, and trends.

    Maybe but not everyone buys into hype and such. Just wait until all of the people who are living now get a little older and start to throw their weight around a little more. I very much doubt that anything you see will continue.

    --
    Slashdot social engineering at it's finest
  26. Re:Jon's writing style? What about yours? by slashdot-terminal · · Score: 2

    Well, you obviouslly didn't read what I was talking about. At no point did I say his spelling, grammar, or punctuation was where his flaws were at. I said his flaws were in his
    content and his organization. I'll thank you for thinking before you're cynical next time.


    Specifically on what basis are the arguments bad? How is the content bad? Are there any ways to actually conclusively proving him wrong? Has anything he said actually been documented as wrong. People such as I need hard and conclusive evidence that what is being said is actually the truth. The only thing that I see is that he tries to make predictions on events and social situations that are not easily predictable in most ways. Like some of the sci-fi people in years past. I remember reading a book back in elementary school which said that by the 1990s we would have moon bases and be on our way to mars. Well have any of these things happened? No because people would rather live out their pathetic lives on good ol' planet earth and not actually explore space. Let me give you a little prediction of mine. ST TNG level of technology will be about 30,000 years in the future there is no way that we will have it in 2390 or so.

    --
    Slashdot social engineering at it's finest
  27. I'm Confused! by Jack+William+Bell · · Score: 2

    Is the movie supposed to be a documentary or something? Somehow I was under the impression that Katz's book 'Geeks' was not a work of fiction -- or at least not fiction in the same sense that 'Microserfs' was.

    So which is it? Is 'Geeks' a novel with some real-world characters or is it a 'non-fictional' 'real-life' depiction of us geeks at work and play? And what does either possibility say about the movie deal? Someone help me out here!

    Jack

    --
    - -
    Are you an SF Fan? Are you a Tru-Fan?
  28. Re:???Maybe Kevin Smith??? by WhyteRabbyt · · Score: 2

    Methinks KS will be tied up with Clerks, the Animated Series, and then Clerks 2 for some time to come...

    For more Kevin Smith info try here

    --
    free experimental electronic music netlabel at www.viablehybrid.com
  29. Re:if the movie ..)(Bully Thread begins) by Maeryk · · Score: 2

    *My favorite scene is going to be when the geeks get beat up by the jocks, and then the geeks get older and get rich. Then the jocks beat them up again anyway. *

    "extrapolation": you are old, bitter, and unhappy with your life, and wish the days of you whupping someone for their lunch money would come back so you could have some value again?

    Strangely enough, the jocks that used to do that same thing to me in school have mostly passed from this world into whatever lies after, due to their inability to grasp that the real world is NOT high school, and people OUTSIDE of school are ALLOWED to carry weapons, not prohibited from doing it, for the very reason they get used for. Stopping obnoxious bully's and thiefs for once and for all.

    *grin*

    Geeks with guns.. we're everywhere, we're everywhere.

    Maeryk

    --
    Feminine Protection? What is that? A chartreuse flame thrower?
  30. Do you know what the funny thing about /. is? by jw3 · · Score: 2
    - It's the little differences. A lotta the same news we got here they got there, but there they're little different.

    :-)

    Regards,

    j.

    P.S. Now describe to me what JonKatz looks like!

  31. moderation by Corrinne+Yu · · Score: 2

    The MST2K crew, Tom Servo, et. al. can be the movie moderators.


    Corrinne Yu
    3D Game Engine Programmer

  32. Mandatory Reality Check by AntiKatz · · Score: 2
    Katz PR machine on overdrive: reality check essential.
  33. Linux Pulp Fiction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3

    ...know what they call Linux in France?

    What, OS Royale?

    Actually, I think they still call it Linux.

  34. Samuel L. Jackson as a geek by Stiletto · · Score: 3

    "Put down that motherfucking mouse before I bust your motherfucking hand off!"
    ________________________________

  35. This is bad for the 'net, the world is ending. by GMontag · · Score: 3


    When a major multi-national corporation distributes a book it crushes all competition and it is the end of print media.

    This is compounded by the backing of a media powerhouse like a studio. First they make one movie and before you know it, they are making all of the movies and they control the world.

    This move is a corruption of the OpenSource spirit and the sky is falling and the world is ending.



    Congratulations on your new deal!


  36. Re:???Maybe Kevin Smith??? by brianvan · · Score: 3

    Jay and Silent Bob as CmdrTaco and Hemos?

    (shudder)

  37. How about Slashdot the Sitcom? by karb · · Score: 3
    You'd be appealing to a lot of young professionals with lots of disposable income.

    There are lots of easy plot ideas. The guys meet one of the "first post" guys, who turns out to be some famous celebrity (preferably an attractive female one). Hemo's hamster gets killed by crawling into a computer, the guys have an adventure replacing it, etc.

    Eventually, however, they'd end up transferring Lt. Worf to the geek compound to boost ratings.

    It would turn out to be a boon to the writers, who finally get the chance to eliminate Jon Katz' character, despite his immense popularity as a result of being played by michael richards. ("Katz!")

    Worf : Katz! In writing these articles you insult my Klingon Ancestors! [Worf cleaves Katz]

    --

    Jack Valenti and the MPAA are to technology as the Boston strangler is to the woman home alone

  38. topical? by Maeryk · · Score: 3

    It amazes me how a discussion of a post about the option rights bought by a publishing company can become an unmitigated thread of Katzbashing. Regardless of what he says, he DOES have a right to say it, and /. has a right to post it. Im amazed by the fact that people who put silly little snarky comments towards /. always have almost nothing valid to say towards the thread, but yet complain that they are moderated. *sigh*

    As for this news, I think it is GOOD news.. I find myself in agreeance with Jon's views in a lot of cases, but the convoluted way he gets to it sometimes leads me to wish he had an editor. However, remember, Einstein could barely write legibly, let alone grammatically correctly. So what? do we ignore everything he had to say because the man wrote badly? No, we hail him as a genius and work around his learning disorders.

    I personally WELCOME a geek movie from Jon.. at least he has read enough comments FROM the geek community to get a feel for it, even if he doesnt share that communitys viewpoints in the majority (or the vocal minority, im still not sure which applies here). But, im sure the film will turn (if made) out better than Hackers, or any of the other stupid films that have attempted to paint uber-geeks as gutter punks with antique hardware whose life revolves around boy meets girl and hacking el evil corporation.

    I realy hope that this film gets made, and I hope Jon holds some sway over the final outcome. (if he is true to his beliefs, I think he would anyway, or would block the production of it, much as Gibson did with all the characters out of Neuromancer cept Johnny).

    Anyway.. Kudos to you Katz, good luck, and have fun!

    --
    Feminine Protection? What is that? A chartreuse flame thrower?
  39. cameo, phbbbt! by ChristTrekker · · Score: 3

    Hey, I'll stunt-double for CmdrTaco. You never know when you might be swapping out some RAM and get a nasty shock. Wouldn't want that to happen on film. The girl geeks would definitely not dig it. OTOH, stunt men are chick magnets, as anyone knows.... ;)

    It would be perfect! We even share the same initials! Really, dude, you gotta have me as your stunt man.

    CT

  40. Ya know... by Chris+Johnson · · Score: 4
    ...this is really not unlike the hippie phenomenon.

    Back when Katz was young and hadn't smoked too much dope, there was a subculture called 'hippies'. There were a certain amount of hippies that were perfectly sincere, and quite a lot of plastic imitations cruising over to the Haight on the weekends. (No, I wasn't one of the latter, I was about 3 months old at the time).

    Eventually hippieness became a media explosion, infighting set in, and now hippie is largely an epithet, a term of abuse or embarrassment and something to be repudiated.

    Thanks to Jon Katz, I can foresee a time when geek becomes equally an embarrassment. Where hippie became synonymous with an airheaded spacecase, geek will become synonymous with a sociopathic, daylight-fearing danger to society.

    And maybe that's good, because then we can get back to being people for a change. :P

  41. Unfortunate by Herbmaster · · Score: 4

    I find it really unfortunate that Lawrence Bender and his people are doing this, because it means it probably won't completely suck, and it deserves to. I must say I'm surprised, one thing about Bender's movies is that they've always been in some way new and original, and not typical Hollywood rehashing of the same themes we've already seen before. Not JonKatz. JonKatz is pro-Geek, anti-Censorship, anti-American/Establishment, anti-Conservative, anti-Religious, pro-Conspiracy-Theory, pro-Porn, pro-mp3, pro-linux, anti-MS. Wow, what an amazing set of original creeds! (or not) I can't wait to see all the twists and surprises in this movie!

    JonKatz loves to play off the contradiction which is the popularity of 'alternative' culture. Geeks are alternative, so JonKatz has to write good things about them. Same with linux and mp3s and everything else. The y2k bug became too mainstream, so JonKatz had to say that it was a stupid overhyped thing which didn't matter.

    The problem is that he doesn't actually think for himself too often. If you remember any of the old articles he posted (the ones where he stilled talked about computers, and used the word 'geek' 3 times per paragraph), it was obvious he had no idea what he was talking about or being a geek was. Of course sometimes he got the main point correct, but only incidentally, and without a lot of depth of discussion behind it.

    The best part of JonKatz's articles has always been the user comments. I don't think we'll get that in the movie.

    Besides, JonKatz once called Contact a failure, how can he ever be involved with the making of a good movie?

    I can't wait to see how many times he uses the word 'geek' and uses microsoft-html in his movie.

    --
    I'm not a smorgasbord.
  42. It's perfect! by FascDot+Killed+My+Pr · · Score: 4

    Katz and Hollywood were meant for each other. Both represent the cream of the pseudo-intellectual crop.

    "And Hemos and I get cameos!"

    This explains why Katz is still around, I guess.

    (goodbye 70+ karma...)
    ---

    --
    Linux MAPI Server!
    http://www.openone.com/software/MailOne/
    (Exchange Migration HOWTO coming soon)
    1. Re:It's perfect! by hegemon · · Score: 4

      Usually I just ignore people with bad attitudes. Really, I don't feel it's my place to butt into other peoples' lives to tell them that their behavior is inappropriate. Sometimes, however, it is necessary.

      Your comments about Katz are completely out of line. He has done more to help geeks and the "geek cause" than anyone I've ever heard of. Read his latest book when it comes out (_Geeks_). Even if you disagree with his view of tech culture, you should at least be able to admit that he deserves more respect than you've shown him in these posts.

      In addition, CmdrTaco and Hemos also deserve more respect. Your 70+ karma is nothing compared to what they've done. They help run /., and if that isn't enough for you, they are also better geeks who truly contribute to the community. I should also point out that a high karma achieved by the high volume, low quality posting you do is not
      much to be proud of. I've even looked at your high moderation posts and found that they are almost uniformly examples of the problems with the moderation system.

      I don't know CmdrTaco and Hemos, but I have a passing acquaintance with Katz, and I do not find him to be a pseudo- anything. He is an intelligent author and a worthwhile conversationalist. If you don't see that from his
      posts, you should at least let what respect you have for the /. bunch guide you with regard to your evaluation of his character and intelligence, since they know him much better than you do. Ah, I forgot, you don't seem to have much respect for those who run /.

      Now I've had another glimpse into the dark side of the geek. All I see is a bunch of angry adolescents who improperly focus their pain on aggression against those who are slightly different then they are. It is sickening and
      fascinating that the same childish impulse to hurt and exclude others that in the vast majority of cases forced geeks to become geeks shows up again in the geek community it created.

      I think you'll find killing Piggy doesn't make people love you. Of course this time Piggy has the high ground. It speaks well for him that he doesn't choose to take advantage of it.

  43. Resevoir Geeks? Pulp Slashdot? by darylp · · Score: 4

    Are you SURE that Tarantino directing would be such a good idea?

    Mind you, the thought of CmdrTaco in a Gimp mask is kinda appropriate...

  44. ???Maybe Kevin Smith??? by Cplus · · Score: 4

    Who produced Goodwill Hunting, directed Clerks, Mallrats, Chasing Amy, and Dogma. He's worked with Lawrence Bender in the past and when I first heard of this it was his name that was mentioned. Actually my friend wasn't familiar with John Katz and said that it was the proposed new Kevin Smith flick.
    It would be great if there were cameos (or parts) for Silent Bob (KS) and Jay (I'll never get enough of those two.

    --
    "Share your knowledge. It's a way to achieve immortality." -- Dalai Lama
  45. Re:Short List by HP+LoveJet · · Score: 5

    What if the entire movie was based, not just on Katz's book, but on the Slashdot community's reaction to it?

    The opening titles would begin with a bunch of really lame dorks who appear on screen for no reason and shout "FIRST CAMEO DUDE!!!"

    The film would be periodically interrupted with hysterically funny haiku, apropos of what was happening in the plot at that moment.

    Of course, there would have to be a retelling of the legend of Pygmalion, starring MEEPT as Pygmalion and Natalie Portman as Galatea.

    The closing credits could have somebody reading the Slashdot Address, the M&M-breeding article, or a Generic Flame--or perhaps all three at once, since no one will actually be paying attention.

    Maybe the dialogue in the film itself could be moderated to different volume levels.

    --
    spawn_of_yog_sothoth
  46. RE: Samuel L. Jackson as a geek. by Lord+Kano · · Score: 5

    How's this.

    "Reach in that bag and give back that Palm Pilot."

    "The one that says 'Bad Motherfucker' on the case."

    Ving Rhames as a geek

    "We're going to get a couple of Jolt fiending programmers and get object oriented on his ass."

    Tarantino...

    "Where do you see 'dead vaio storage' ?"

    I gotta get back to work, I can keep this up all day...

    LK

    --
    "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
  47. Keep your pants on, this doesn't mean we'll see it by barzok · · Score: 5
    New Line has optioned the book. That basically means they called "we got dibs" on the rights to make a movie out of the book for the next X years (for a price, of course). It doesn't mean they will make a movie, it doesn't even mean they've given thought thought about script/director/whatever. It just means they think the book has enough value that they don't want to risk losing the chance to make the movie to another studio - or, more importantly, risk another studio making the movie and thus making money they may have had a chance at.

    Remember DOOM was optioned for a movie at least 3, 4 years ago. the options have been bought and sold around Hollywood, and we're still not even close to seeing a feature film.