Slashdot Mirror
Linux Journal on the DMCA
phantomlord writes "Linux Journal has a very good summary of how the Digital Millennium Copyright Act came about and how it relates to DeCSS. " Well, how it came about was simple: the copyright industries just paid a lot of money to the right Congressmen. How to get rid of it is the more interesting question.
There have been a lot of people here who have asked the same question: "What can I do?" There's a lot we can do, but only if we do it now. If you wait even a few weeks, the entire ballgame may have changed.
- Post the code. Don't just link to it - get another copy of it out there. If you really believe in this, put yourself on the line; post the code and make a stand.
- Write up flyers and distribute them. Get actions organized with others to go out and get them distributed. We need to get the message out to the "mainstream" public.
- Refuse to see another movie made by any of the movie studios affilliated with the MPAA, ever . If you want to see the new Star Wars or Star Trek movie, you're just going to have to decide which means more to you - the next installment or your rights. If these studios want us to go back into their theaters, all they have to do is withdraw from the MPAA and demonstrate that they give a damn about their customers. Until then, to hell with them.
- Support any motion picture studio that is not a member of the MPAA. Learn to appreciate the joys of independent film.
- If you're currently arguing for a boycott of DVD, stop. It's not the technology's fault, and by doing this you hurt independent movie studios who wish to release in digital format. DVD is broken - let's keep it broken. All a boycott will do is destabilize the industry, allow the MPAA to say "see, we were right, DeCSS destroyed DVD" and give them an excuse to put even worse laws and "protections" into place. Don't boycott DVD - support it wholeheartedly.
- Write your Congressman and make your displeasure clear. It may fall on deaf ears, but even a deaf man knows when a million people want his head.
- Write letters to the editor, guest editorials, flyers, websites, everything. In the presidential election of 1992, when this administration came into office, James Carville had a very simple strategy - don't let any action go unresponded to for more than a news cycle. React fast, adapt faster, attack even faster. We're the antibodies of the Internet and this is an infection that will kill the body. Let's kill it first.
- Get informed. Read everything on this issue you can get your hands on. Don't gloss over where our case is weak - admit to it. Admit that we're weak under the DMCA - attack the DMCA itself. People will respect it more than if you fudge the facts to get a convert.
I worked in the election of 1992. In order to respond to local action faster - say, the other side was planning a local demonstration and we wanted to be present - we organized a "phone tree". Every person in this tree had a list of ten phone numbers. The person on the top of the tree would call their ten people, and each of the ten would call ten more. In under an hour, hundreds of people were in their cars and moving.We may need to organize something like this - by both email and phone. We need to be in front of television cameras, we need to be talking to reporters with notepads. Contact your local Linux users group and find out what they're doing about this. If they're doing nothing, or you have no Linux group in your area, get something organized yourself.
If you see an online poll, or a newspaper phone poll, that asks "Should hackers be prosecuted?" or anything similar, FLOOD IT . Get as close to 99% for our side as you can. Am I recommending polling fraud? You're damned right I am. It's standard practice in any U.S. political campaign.
Us Linux people have a tendency of believing that the best outcome is inevitable, because deep down we tend to believe in people. If we take the attitude that it's all going to work out because we're in the right, we are in severe trouble, because the other side is doing the same thing with a lot more resources.
We need to start dealing with this like a major political campaign against a popular and long-seated incumbent, who has vast resources and rooted connections. We need to start acting like a guerilla force against a standing army, and stop screwing around.
They want a fight? Let's give them a fight.
Rob Warren
www.iag.net/~aleris
The funny thing about this whole debate over access control for copyrights is - it all happened long ago around the turn of the century. Actually, it was a bit different the last time. The last time, it was an attempt by patent holders to expand their rights through outrageous "Licenses" and the Motion Picture Industry was fighting for freedom!
Read the Supreme Court decision in MOTION PICTURE PATENTS CO. v. UNIVERSAL FILM MFG. CO. , 243 U.S. 502 (1917) for some amusemt. Edison and the New York patent holders attempted to do all the evil things the MPAA and DVDCCA are now doing. Hopefully the Court will uphold the doctrine of "first sale" and allow thos who purchase DVDs to use them as any other piece of property that they own.
Oh, and even before motion pictures, book publishers attempted to use licenses printed inside book covers to prevent customers from selling used books after they finished reading them. History does repeat and greedy corporations don't seem to change.
I have a theory about DVD-CSS that I want to try out. I encourage debate on this, since I think it's an angle that nobody has looked at yet.
It's the idea that you can't record (not copy) your own DVD without the "official" software.
It doesn't make sense to me that you would control the use of a player for whatever system you have. It's the theory of standardization. The more you sell, the more you sell because you have become the defacto standard for that technology. That's why we use VHS instead of Beta, and why MS kicked booty on Apple. So, it's to your advantage to freely distribute your player ala IE or Acrobat Viewer or Shockwave Plugins.
The film industry is a weird thing. Hollywood was built by accountants. All movies do not make money. How? Everything is taken off of the top, what we call gross points. There is also what we call net points, where you get a percentage of what's left after expenses. Everything gets taken out of gross points, so a studio almost always fails to make a hefty profit. Of course, everyone makes money, but for tax purposes, every movie is a flop.
Now, here come the independent filmmakers. These guys make a movie for less that $50,000, so if a movie makes it big, it makes it BIG! What's even better, these guys make better movies, more suited to thinking intellectuals than the usual mass-marketed pulp.
So, the big studios see these "yahoos" coming in and taking out some slices of the pie, which are needed for the industry system to function, and need a way to up the "profit" margin.
Enter DVD and CSS. The industry gets to pick how you read and write your own DVD's. Make the cost of recording software prohibitively expensive. Don't release recording software for Irix.
The reason that these independents are making movies so cheaply is that they use computer graphics to fix up the footage during editing. That means that they can spend less time shooting on location, which is prohibitively expensive. Once you buy a good CG system, you are limited only by time.
The potential from DVD for independent filmmakers is enormous. I offer the following scenarios:
A) You're an independent filmmaker trying to get a deal to sell your film to a chain of theaters. It's very expensive to get your film transfered to celluloid (film that goes in a projector). That's what the deal guys use to preview movies. So, you burn a DVD from your CG machine (the whole movie's on your hd, remember?) and get a laptop with a DVD player. You have a very portable instant-presentation device. Oh, here, wait a minute, I have it on my laptop, I can show you right now. If you have a couple of these setups, you can take them to show at Sundance or wherever.
B) Several independents get together and form a distributed distribution organization. They use a DVD repository, and manufacturing facilities all over the world. A filmmaker makes his film, loads it on the server, and presses all over the world start distributing this DVD. Sure, it's 8Gigs, but it only gets sent out a couple of times. Big studios are all about distribution--they are the kings of it. What the independent needs is a way to get his product out there in the market. It's a major problem for independents.
C) An independent filmmaker wants to make a film with a message and is not concerned about making any profit. He puts the whole damn thing on the net and lets anybody download it free. My wife, who has a degree in theater, says that it would just make the studios go ballistic that somebody would have a good movie (better that their waste of film) and be giving it away for free.
I just don't know why anybody has thought of this. Maybe we need to start telling the independents about these capabilities that they are missing out on.
For more information about independent films, check out ifc's web page www.ifctv.com or IF magazine www.ifmagazine.com
I do what the voices on my console tell me to do.
Yes, there was a group, with plans to produce a (closed source) DVD player for Linux that formally approached the DVD CCA for a license and were refused. The group was a startup and the DVD CCA felt that they weren't a big enough company to run with the Big Boys.
Anomalous: inconsistent with or deviating from what is usual, normal, or expected
Anomalous: deviating from what is usual, normal, or expected
Canard: a false or unfounded repor