Slashdot Mirror
Tera Will Buy Cray Research
I just found this short news in C|Net which states that Tera Computer will buy Cray Research from SGI for an undisclosed amount of cash, stocks and notes (although the Wall Street Journal estimates the price that Tera pays is less then $100 million, which is a fraction compared to what SGI had to pay when they bought Cray - $740 million). Tera is going to change their company name to ... Cray.
The last thing seymore cray did before his passing was to start his own, independent company. 2 more years to go baby :)
I've been following SGI for quite a while now.. They began focusing on the x86 line as they figured the 64-bit Merced/Itanium/McKinney/[fill in the blank] would take over the marketplace sometime very soon for visual workstations.
On the high end market, they purchased Cray, and continued work on the Orion line of supercomputers.
Bad move buying Cray, bad move focusing on x86 64-bit imho. They had to get rid of Cray as it was becoming excess baggage. I may be wrong, but Intel is having trouble getting their 64-bit cpu higher than 400Mhz, while Alpha are laughing happily to the bank on their 21264 chipset, while working on their 21364 chipset (1000Mhz, 64-bit I believe). Sun continues working towards the UltraSparc-3 chipset (750Mhz 64-bit) and UltraSparc-5 chipset (1500Mhz 64-bit).
Perhaps SGI should stick to high end 32-bit x86 chips for their workstation line, and continue pumping out MIPS cpu's on the beautiful Origin line. I understand fazeing out IRIX, but really..
Where will it end? I love SGI products! Are they organized enough to provide me with a reliable long term gameplan, and be able to produce their servers in a timely manner?
EraseMe
The university I am attending bought a cray last summer for 1.7 million canadian. They were so exciting to dish out their money, someone forgot to think that maybe it needed software to do interesting things. So they blew their budget on hardware, and now we've got a 'super computer' that simply heats a building. You can check it out at giant.lakeheadu.ca
Is there and point to super computers anymore? For much much less, they could have built a beowulf cluster and actually had software to run on it.
Cray Research only works on current and way damn old Cray computers. The newest ones are not quite ready yet, and are not being made by Cray Research. ( they may release a system called a Cray but it is in no way close to what Seymore's folks have coming) "No Ticket" Silent Bob
Can anyone tell me why SGI is not traded on NASDAQ? Is it some company policy deal-io or what?
With an 800 MHz Athlon getting a bit over 1 GFLOP, kinda makes me wonder about the future of supercomputers. Beowulf clusters, slow, scaled deployment, and the like look more attractive to me than buying into a mega-expensive setup from a single company.
Maybe SGI don't see a future in old world big iron.
These days anyone with the cash can buy a hundred or so fast workstations and using clustering build a *super* computer. I am inclined to believe that SGI has forseen the end of mainframes the amount of work they have put into linux filesystems (the really high end stuff) they must have encountered beowulfs and the like
sparkes
blog and junk
When it comes down to it, this really isn't too surprising given what's going on in the market and what happened to CRI as it grew into middle age. The market forces are obvious: lots of computing problems that used to be in the exclusive domain of supercomputers have been assumed by much smaller computers. Budgets of large government agencies have been dramatically reduced and with them, a large customer base has disappeared. If you're trying to make money, this spells disaster.
Furthermore, like any organization, as they developed into more of a "sustained business" organization rather than a "let's build the fastest computer ever" organization, it became more and more difficult to innovate as rapidly as before (this is one of the reasons Seymour left). In the hey day of large government defense contracts, this was not a problem. However, as budgets dwindled they ran into significant difficulty penetrating new markets (a $30M machine is not an easy sell).
It's really too bad as they have done some really neat things. In some senses it was the ultimate geek environment. In the engineering tradeoffs, speed always wins (which is why the things are so darn expensive). They used different wires for memory reads and writes, high memory interleaving, the I/O subsystems are multiple computers tasked for nothing more than I/O, vector registers make large FP computation chains very fast, no virtual memory (you can't use what you ain't got). In most cases, if it was slow they threw H/W at it. And then there was materials research for cooling and lots of other cool stuff.
I don't know what Tera plans to do with them, but unless they have a good way to penetrate into the business markets (and there are opportunities), before long Cray will simply be a name for the history books. It's really too bad considering all the contributions they've made to the computing world.
...in the heck are you talking about? I didn't understand a word of that.
There are still (and probably always will be) problem domains wich map badly to clusters.
I think this is good news. I've allways been fond of Cray, The company was Hq'd in my home town. The Cray name still has value even though the supercomputer market has dried up somewhat. I think the name change to Cray, reguardless of what processing market they're going after, will bring some level of branding with what the old Cray used to have. I'm glad Cray, in whatever form will still be around and not go the way of the dinosaurs
More race stuff in one place,
than any one place on the net.
Scooby should make a supercomputer. Not one that runs on electricity, but one that runs on grits. Thats right, grits. Remember in Back to the Future II when Dr. Brown started putting garbage in the nuclear powered future car? What if a Computer would run on hot steaming grits? The steam could turn a turbine and that would generate electricity for the computer! We could paint it brown, and put some stratigically places spots on it to honor our buddy Scooby. Just an idea. I'm full of them.
/.!
Trolling for Scooby doo!
Long live Trolling on
The details on the transaction do not seem to be public yet, the news stories I have read make a vague mention of "undisclosed amount of cash, stock and notes for the company."
Given that TERA is one of those almost-on-life-support companies with some neato tech, perhaps this is really just a way for SGI to get access to TERA's technology. TERA certainly does not have the cash to buy Cray, so it seems likely that the majority of the transaction will be for shares and warrants of TERA. At the very least, such a transaction would give SGI a significant minority interest in TERA. On the other side of the equation, SGI gets to write-off a $600M+ tax-loss which should really help them out should they ever be able to sustain profitability.
When information is power, privacy is freedom.
be invloved?
As an irate IRIX user, let me tell you what is responsible for all of SGI's problems recently: a certain big fat penguin.
While IRIX had advanced features that Linux users can only dream of, Linux has nothing to reccomend it to users. A few buggy desktop environments? A pretty window manager? Please. I can get those anywhere.
Instead, it's the little things that I miss, such as support for mice with more than 3 buttons, or advanced virtual memory (which can often be stored on ram disks for better performence). When I was forced to switch to running Linux on my SGI, I soon found that nothing I had would run! How do they expect users to make the switch from a stable, open environment (in 3 years, IRIX has *never* crashed on me, but gcc dumps core all the time) to a buggy, hack-ridden kludge like Linux? Yeah, it's great that you let 16 year olds write your kernel drivers, but for me, I prefer leaving it up to the pros. Think you can call that kid for tech support? Not after 11:00, that's his bedtime.
Ever since SGI turned from a high-power workstation producer to a sleazy Lintel vendor, I have been continually disgusted with them. Why would I want a dinky beige box running some toy OS? Hell, I once wrote a dynamic linker for my TRS-80, and I'm thinking I could extend it to full POSIX support. When I do, don't expect any open source from me. I prefer to actually eat occasionally, which I'm sure you'll understand once you leave your high schools or colleges and enter the real world.
SGI is findning that they are having a hard time competing in both software, hardware, and Super Computing markets all at the same time.
This is just helping themselves get rid of one of those markets and focus on the ones that have the most groth.
To be honest, with the ammount of support SGI is throwing into Linux, I wouldn't be surprised if IRIX disappears in the next few years and they wind up cutting Alias|Wavefront lose so they can just concentrate on building machines.
Another good sign of this is the fact that SGI is working on a version of Maya (A|W's current top dog 3D modeler) for Linux.
... And just the other day I was chuckling to myself on reading a William Gibson story which included a Cray computer...
But then, it was a handheld; I doubt we're going to be seeing handheld Crays for a while...
(nil)
Incidentally, it's a good idea to change the name "Tera", it links you to technology that will be dated when everybody focus on "peta-" things. It's like being named "20th Century Something" in the 21st century.
--
__
Men with no respect for life must never be allowed to control the ultimate instruments of death.
GW Bu
So, Cray was torn apart by SGI and Sun. Sun jerks over their portion and comes up with the Enterprise 10000. SGI flounders a while with their chunk and ends up only holding a name to sell.
While I'm glad SGI is embracing Linux, in light of what they did to Cray, do we want the Linux name associated with this company? I would be happier if Sun truly supported Linux (instead of just paying lip service, community source... gack).
In SGI's defense, $100 million is a pretty good price for a trademark and a domain name.
I'd have to disagree with you. Linux is not the one that is thwacking SGI around. There marketing dept. is the only one to blame, (and maybe their old CEO who did that Visual PC fiasco...).
Like you I love my Irix, it runs smooth and clean, never crashes on me and it's got all of the power functions that Linux has (and many more) but Linux hasn't got quite gotten down polish yet. But as a SGI supporter I feel embarassed to agree with you, your attitude leaves the same icky taste in my mouth that the Linux zealots leave (or Solaris, Mac, Windows....). If one were to look back in SGI's Irix history there are more than a few skeletons...
Don't confuse mainframes with super-computers. Mainframes tend to be targeted towards the commercial market, and supers are sold to the technical market.
Yes, there is a lot of overlap between the two markets nowadays, but they still have two different goals: commercial cares about reliabilty and uptime, technical cares about getting the right answers even if it takes a while (well, not too long).
In the hey-day of supers, the joke was that super-computing was a synonym for unreliable computing. The reason the joke was true was two-fold: a small customer-base means less people to bang on the OS and find bugs, and because reliability was not a high-priority to the market.
Sure, the hardware in supers tends to be over-engineered and rock solid, but in a cheapo-pc grade cluster situation you can easily make up for hardware reliability problems through redundancy, just have a couple or ten hot spares ready to pick up where the last node crashed.
As for your point about problems with high inter-process communication requirements, I totally agree.
When information is power, privacy is freedom.
I have to agree with this fella, being an IRIX user of 2 years myself. It feels like a good time to use my farm analogy. My family owns and operates a large small-grains farm in the midwest. Our livelyhood depends on not just the weather, but our equipement as well. Most of our large equipment is John Deere and Flexicoil brand, between 2 and 6 years old, and under warranty. We don't use the latest and greatest wiz-bang toys, nor do we try to pull a 50-foot chisel plow with a Ford Ranger. When your business is on the line, or maybe even just your time, it only makes sense to use proven, relable equipement.
http://www. catalog.com/hopkins/unix-haters/tirix/embarrassing -memo.html
I would love it if cray/tera came out with a 64 bit desktop. If they kept it in the affordable range I would love one. We have a few SGIs at my work place and I just love the things. It would be nice to have a few Cray workstations/desktops. What would they run though? CrayOS/linux hybrid?
Microsoft aggravates my tourettes syndrome.
Heh, that goes with out saying. I thought everyone knew that.
Trolling for Scooby doo!
Do the doo!
While Seymour himself tended to favor supercomputers with a small number of very fast processors, Cray also developed an MPP system that earned them a large number of patents.
With Tera doing MPP and hardware multithreading, I suspect it makes sense to buy Cray for the patents alone! The existing Cray and Tera machines are very complementary, with little real overlap.
The only missing part is the Cray Computer Company that was bought by Sun. Their storage systems are still among the fastest in the industry. It seems Sun has not transitioned these storage systems into the enterprise as well as was hoped. Maybe Tera can get into the supercomputer storage business as well?
-BobC
It always amazes me how the same old bs comes up when people mention the HPC market...linux/clusters/end of cold ware& market shrinkage/...at leats 80% of the comments I have just read are based on typical sales misinformation. The points which stuck are. 1. Clusters - apples and pears, read the neswgroups and wake up to the facts. EG: Peak perfomance and typical utilisation of COTS CPU's are leagues apart,etc,rant..rave,etc. 2. SGI getting only $100mill - considering what they did (and were proposing to do) with Cray they've got off lightly. 3. The Supercomputing market is alive and well. Granted its not what it used to be during the ol' days but it is still a well defined, stable, boyant (at times) place to do business. People have to accept that it is only a $1Billion/year area. People don't dismiss Web Caching at its estimated $500million market. 4. If you fancy a pocket Cray get a EL series machine and buy a coat with pockets the size of a wardrobe 8-) 5. Cray is a legend within computing:- first transistor based computer, first implementaton of UNIX on HPC platform, first use of mulitprocessors, fastest microprocessor in use (I think thats still true), only system to show sustained 1 Teraflop of real world app. 6. I'd eat my (red)hat if UNICOS went to linux. The s/w side of things has taken years of development and are some of the most proven HPC solutions. They are key to Cray's success - balanced systems. Rant over, unroll do loop, have I been cache coherent - probably not.
Seems to make sense to me. NSA is funding the SV2 development at CRAY. NSA is funding Tera. Stick the whole lot in one pot and the overheads probably go down. You certainly don't want all that tax money flowing into CRAY and straight back out into the SGI bottomless pit...
Do any of you know how I would go about obtaining the cabinet to a Cray X-MP? Not the computer, just the cabinet. You know, the one with a lovely built-in couch over the cooling unit. I've asked around, and I haven't gotten any good leads yet...
I have been driving Irix from the 5.1.x days...
I pity the "irate IRIX user", but from your comment about blaming Linux for SGI's problems, shows a fair amount of inexperience with both SGI and Linux. SGI has been hurting ever since the general Intel chip took the general Mips chip in speed... ( not long after the first 100mhz indy's came out )...
But other reasons for SGI's problems include that fact that, NO, you CAN NOT go get any window manager or desktop environment or even a helloworld.c program, because SGI's DO NOT ship with compilers, only until recently did they make it POSSIBLE to install the proper headers... and then you have to install gcc for a user to be able to compile ANYTHING!!...
Irix, 4dwm/mwm, etc. is not a "stable. open environment", and the hack ridden kludge is Irix. I invite you to take a stroll to the kernel traffic site and see what the posts from former SGI engineers say regarding Irix, GL and the hacks/bloat involved in its deployment/marketing.
Blame the suits that elected a CEO that leads the company to produce NT based machines, and then quits to go work for microsoft.(And that same CEO, got a ~1 million bonus the first year).
Blame the graphics company that decides to make pc graphics cards 5 years too late, after many of the original engineers that developed the technology left.
Don't get me wrong, I like Irix and the parts that set it out from the crowd, but to blame Linux is sophomoric. Many current SGI engineers have been supporting and using Linux for quite some time, long before it became "popular". And some consider Linux to be SGI's last chance. All SGI has left is its knowledge, which is what its started with...
It just seems to me that instead of Cray they should simply change their name to Beaver College.
SGI gutted Cray Research.
They bought them to acquire some patents and interconnect technologies. On the high-end SGI Origin2000 the CPUs are connected by a high speed interconnect dubbed "CrayLink".
They also got a hell of a good distributed storage management/migration system. This allows files that have not been accessed for a while to automatically be migrated from disk to tape. When the user opens the file, it is silently migrated back to disk without the user noticing (except for the latency). Works best with robotic tape systems such as STK.
However, the apparent reason that SGI bought CRI was to eliminate the competition. Any customer requests for Cray systems were diverted by SGI sales over to Origin2000 systems. A customer had to try real hard to get a Cray. "No, I don't want the O2000, I really would prefer a T3E!"
The T3E is a spectacular machine. It uses hundreds or thousands the very powerful Alpha chips with nearly linear scalability. The J90 & SV1 are a commercially successful line of systems that meet the needs of many customers. There is still life in these two architectures for sure.
Tera is getting one of these lines. The T90/J90/SV1/SV2 line of vector computers.
Tera is not trying to eliminate the competition as SGI did. Tera needs the name recognition and for their sake, they must also realize that Tera needs to adopt the pioneering culture that is still associated with everything Cray. So far, Tera has not done anything that makes us stand up and say "Wow!".
Tera has interesting technology in the works, their "Multithreaded Architecture (MTA)". They have produced some very promising benchmarks (who hasn't). I just hope that they realize the great opportunity afforded them by purchasing the Cray name and get some genuine innovation going. They could also use a colorful spokesman, just make sure that he/she is second to the technology.
Amazing though there hardware is, SGI knows it simply can't compete with larger chip developers, especially Intel. Intel's R&D budget is orders of magnitude greater than anything the MIPS folks will ever see, and it's really starting to show. Right now, if you compare the fastest x86 chip with the fastest MIPS chip in integer performance, the x86 will absolutely blow it away. McKinley threatens to bring that same differential over to the FP side as well.
So, yes, right now SGI workstations can hold their own with better FP and peripherals (bus, architecture, etc), but two years down the road it would be a very different story as IA64 kicks into gear. HP, whose PA-RISC has consistently been much faster than the MIPS line, realized this too in their shift towards IA-64. Let's just hope that SGI is successful in bringing all their technologies to Linux in that timeframe so they still have some workstations to sell.
--JEZ
Besides, Cray-type supercomputers are over. All modern big machines are collections of single chip microprocessors. They have to be; the speed of light is too slow for a gigahertz big-box CPU. You can't even afford the slowdown for off-chip connections. Designing a fast CPU chip isn't worth doing unless you can sell a lot of them, so supercomputers have to use commodity CPUs. All that's left is architecting big multiprocessors and clusters out of commodity CPUs, which is mostly a software problem.
SGI has other problems, the main one being lack of focus. "We're a graphics company". "We're a movie and game tool company." "No, now we're a server company". "We're an NT workstation company". "Forget that, now we're a Linux company". They keep trying to find some niche that isn't disappearing, and it's not working.
I am willing to bet that SGI will not survive as an independant company. Nobody has ever turned a profit by selling Linux products.
They will be bought by some big-name company before the year is out.
I'd like to add to the IRIX-bashing, since we had our extended linux bash, earlier.
.tar.gz form. That's insane. Does that really point to a secure, stable OS?
The only thing IRIX has that Linux doesn't have (yet? Or is it in the kernel now?) is a spiffy filesystem. I do recall SGI saying something about porting it to linux, though.
On the other hand, until recently (or does it still?) IRIX had an xhost + in the Xconfig or what have you, so people could run xkeys and watch you type passwords. Go SGI! Then let's consider that the patches necessary to bring IRIX 5.x out of a security nightmare are something like 60mb in
Linux is open source, but people still pay for it. The goal of linux is not to make money. It's to provide a fast, featureful operating system which runs on a variety of hardware. Porting software from one flavor of linux to another is a lot easier than porting from Solaris to IRIX (But then, IRIX has always been a problem child in that department, too.)
Also, my redundancy approacheth, agreemsg on the whole intel killing SGI thing. Let's not forget, however, the 3d accelerator rush. When fast opengl-capable (Remember when OpenGL was basically a SGI buzzword?) video cards rolled out for PC platforms, that was what did it. If you're going to blame IRIX's death on something, blame it on the P54C chip, Windows NT 3.51, and the GLiNT graphics acceleration chips from 3dlabs (Remember, I'm talking about pricepoint here.) Now, you can get a GEforce 256 DDR card for $270 and it handles truly insane numbers of polys - So why use SGI even for that? Add to that the low cost of windows software, and BAM... you have no reason to go SGI. Sure they give you reliability (compared to a PC) but the price of the hardware is insane. Anyone recall how much a drive sled for the indigo R3000 ran you?
"You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
"They also got a hell of a good distributed storage management/migration system. This allows files that have not been accessed for a while to automatically be migrated from disk to tape. When the user opens the file, it is silently migrated back to disk without the user noticing (except for the latency). Works best with robotic tape systems such as STK."
IBM Mainframes have had this for years^H^H^H^H^Hdecades, though they do prompt the systems managers to swap tapes. Big deal.
"You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
A technical aside:
How does swapping to a RAMdisk make any sense. I'm sure I'm missing something, but that just feels kooky. Unless you're meaning ramdisks on other computers (basically distributed shared memory) which assumes that net is significantly faster than local disk. I'll buy that for advanced networking. Just.
Johan
Who ever heard of Tera? But Cray....
It seems to me that everyone here is focusing on "The Demise of Cray". I've worked side by side with Cray employees and Tera ones. They're a perfect match, reguardless of who's funding what.
Tera's revolutionary MTA has been proven to work very well. The best of both a vector and a MPP.
Cray's SV1 may have been a flop, but the SV2 promises not to be. I guess I'm just interested in pure performance, and I, for one, can't wait to see what a combined Tera/Cray company pulls out.
Imagine: Tera compilers for an SV2? or a Tera with all the I/O and experience of a Cray?
excuse me, I think I'm drowning in my own drool...
- --
"I Hate Quotes" -- Samuel L. Clemens
Yeah, I agree, big deal. Except when you consider that other Unix vendors do not have this feature and that IBM isn't licensing the technology.
It was a sad day in supercomputers when Seymour Cray died, and to help his legacy prosper, what did they do? They melted down all production CRAY-3's, and locked all the technology up tighter than fort knox. Hopefully Tera won't make the same mistakes as SGI.
T h e U n d e r g r o u n d W a r e h o u s e
Detachment 3 Media
Exposed, Exploited, Exploded
I have been following both Cray and Tera for many years now. I have been saddened watching the last of the supercomputer companies wither and die. Supercomputers were always so COOL, but for most things, they just aren't so "super" any more.
I have benchmarked several of my back end utilities on cray systems, and one of them on the early tera machine (the early compiler exploded on the others). None of the single processor runs were as fast as a pentium III, and this was quite some time ago.
Understand that this was often branchy and recursive code running with only 3D sized vectors, so it isn't the sweet spot for traditional supercomputers. If I was doing nothing but multiplying 1k by 1k matricies of doubles, even a five year old cray would kick the crap out of the latest athalon. Unfortunately, none of my code looks like that.
I even spent some time thinking how I could restructure calculations into a vectorizable form, which might make a cray J90 competative. I wanted to buy a Cray! Of course, this was silly. It took less effort to make the code SMP friendly, and the payoff was much larger.
We wound up with a 16 processor SGI origin-2000 system, which has been easy to develop for and predictable in performance. We just recently bought an 8 processor Xeon, which is actually faster than our old 16 processor SGI, but at exactly one tenth the price (the downside is that it is maxed out, while the SGI still has tons of growth potential).
I program all heavy workloads in a parallel fashion now as a matter of habit, but it is easy to overstate the benefits of parallel systems.
The common lunux advocate position of "beowulf makes supercomputers obsolete" isn't quite right. Even with code that is already written in a parallel manner, there is a large difference between developing for a shared memory system and a distributed cluster. Developing a compute (and especially data) intensive program for a cluster rather sucks.
If there was a single processor system that was really four times as fast as "consumer" machines, even if it cost fifty times as much, we would buy it. Unfortunately, there isn't. When the product release cycles are favorable, Alpha systems may be twice as good as x86 systems, but not much beyond that unless you are doing the 1k by 1k matrix type stuff.
It is often forgotten that the original Cray-1 was largely a success because it was the fastest SCALAR processor of the time. The vectorization was just a bonus. Now, vectorization is the only thing that gives them a reason for existance.
The tera architecture is very interesting, but for scalar code, it is VERY, VERY slow. I'm not sure if it will be competative with large processor count SGI origin-2000 systems even after it matures. It gains ease of programming from the lack of caches, but it gives away a lot of problem domains where it is going to look stupidly slow.
If a supercomputer company could make a scalar processor that ran many times faster than existing processors and had similar SMP capabilities, it would probably be a success. Even if it cost a million dollars, filled a room, and burned hundreds of kwatts.
The problem isn't really that supercomputers are bad, its just that we are so spoiled by how AMAZINGLY GOOD our cheap consumer hardware is.
I do still worry about the stiffling of innovation that comes from having so few architectural directions for systems, but in the end, wall clock performance is what really matters.
John Carmack
SGI's X server kicks XFree's ass up and down the street. Not to disparage XFree: this is partly because the SGI X server itself is very, very good, but largely because SGI's graphics hardware is better than anything that you can buy in the PC world for love or money. I'm not talking about raw polygons/second in a full-screen window, I'm talking about use as a graphics-intensive desktop. There's nothing that compares to an O2, or even an Indy, as far as running an X desktop goes.
Ok, how about
Don't get me wrong, linux is good. It's just that you cannot bash IRIX of today for its 8 year old sins. Get over it. 5.x sucked and is largely dead. If you are not running 6.5.x you are insane. Moreover, 6.5.x is quite good.
What SGI seems to be doing is bringing the most awesome features of IRIX into Linux, and making them available to all of us great unwashed masses. If you want to bash them for this, then you may be nucking futz, I rather like this strategy.
It makes my job of eliminating all Sun's quite easy. The features I need are here or coming, and the Sun's are too damned expensive. Yeah, SGI is making my life easier.
It's an old idea. IBM and others used to make special high speed disk drives for VM paging. When RAM got cheap enough, the mechanical drive assembly was replaced with RAM with battery backup. The interface was the same but the performance was much better. Adding the same amount of RAM to main memory may not be possible due to architectural limits or lack of expansion space in the CPU cabinet. Some systems support "bulk memory", which isn't directly addressable, but can be used for paging or caching files.
...and also considering the fact that the Cray/SGI/Whatever version is the most robust and efficient version. Provided, you REALLY end up paying for it...
Thinking Machines had those very awsome supercomputers with the big panels of red LEDs doing sort of a "static" effect. Maybe that's what happined, they went broke buying LEDs...
So the big red wavy box decides to buy off SGI? WHAT THE HELL!!! How messed up can the world get? Last time I heard of these guys, they stood for "Truly Enigmatic Rusty Artifact"
Just a comment about what you write on "T3E scales almost linearly". That's something in favour of Cray machine, but you're forgetting that obtaining this linear scalability requires quite hard programming (remember that the T3E is a distributed-memory machine and, although you could use the shmem routines to do some kind of shared memory programming, this is quite a high-level solution). On the other hand, you've got this CC-NUMA SGI architecture, which allows you to program the whole huge machine as a SMP. In brief, the T3E is a native message-passing computer, while the Origin is actually a very sophisticated (far more than Sun's ones) SMP. This is definitively a point in favour of Origin product-line.
But, OK, the Cray is also a great machine.
This is probably too late to be read by_______ anybody, but oh well._____________________________ __________________________________________________
According to , SGI isn't selling all of Cray.__ Instead they're just selling the vector lines,____ and keeping the parallel lines (BTW try not_______ to cringe too much at the scaler/scaler mix-up____ in the article).__________________________________ __________________________________________________
So SGI is keeping the T3E__ line, which has most of Top 500 Supercomputers Computers that Cray still had on the list. Plus, the T3E line meshes much more closely with the SGI Origin line anyway.
So SGI's sale of Cray for $100 Million is not quite as bad as it seems.
Preventive War is like committing suicide for fear of death. - Otto Von Bismarck
Sorry about the other garbled version.
According to this article, SGI isn't selling all of Cray Instead they're just selling the vector lines, and keeping the parallel lines (BTW try not to cringe too much at the scaler/scaler mix-up in the article).
So SGI is keeping the T3E line, which has most of Top 500 Computers that Cray still had on the list. Plus, the T3E line meshes much more closely with the SGI Origin line anyway.
So SGI's sale of Cray for $100 Million is not quite as bad as it seems.
Preventive War is like committing suicide for fear of death. - Otto Von Bismarck
Specifically you wrote:
SGI gutted Cray Research.
Nope. Not even close. SGI was trying at the time to strengthen its portfolio in the supercomputing area. Gutting Cray would have accomplished nothing. I can tell you this, during the acquisition and merger, every meeting with the Cray groups that I attended would wind up in a territory battle or a pissing match, with the Cray group insisting it knew better.
Unfortunately this was not true. They did not know better. They were in sorry shape when SGI bought them, though SGI was also itself in sorry shape by that point. The in-fighting and politics that resulted distracted SGI for the next 4.5 years, with a subsequent loss of profitability. I have friends still there and they recount horrorshows of meetings and decisions made or not made.
Digesting Cray was like digesting a poison. It didn't work. Cray did not wish to be assimilated. I really hope the Tera guys realize what they are in for. Crayons have an ego that far outstrips their actual value.
You also wrote:
However, the apparent reason that SGI bought CRI was to eliminate the competition. Any customer requests for Cray systems were diverted by SGI sales over to Origin2000 systems. A customer had to try real hard to get a Cray. "No, I don't want the O2000, I really would prefer a T3E!"
This is completely false. I worked in the sales organization. We were told to sell the high end stuff. The margins were better, the profits were better... but...
and this is the part that the Crayon's never understood...
nobody wanted the stuff. I worked with the sales teams at legacy Cray customer sites trying to get them to upgrade to the next Cray. They told us time and time again that they wanted to get off of the expensive Crays and onto the cheaper Origins. The fact was that for all but a small fraction of the codes that the customer ran, they ran faster on the cheaper machine (the Origin). Where the vector machines ran faster, we were able to sell vector boxes.
To this day the Crayons I know do not or cannot understand this. They cannot conceive that some one might not want one of their machines, and want a cheaper machine that does the same thing faster. It is anathema to them. It is also precisely why they were ready to go under when SGI bought them. And it is precisely why SGI nearly went under trying to deal with them.
You also wrote: The T3E is a spectacular machine. It uses hundreds or thousands the very powerful Alpha chips with nearly linear scalability. The J90 & SV1 are a commercially successful line of systems that meet the needs of many customers. There is still life in these two architectures for sure. Tera is getting one of these lines. The T90/J90/SV1/SV2 line of vector computers.
Firstly, the J's were not successful by any measure. They broke even. The SV1 is more than 2 years late, and in some cases the loaner Origin that SGI provided in many cases free of charge while the customer was waiting was faster than the late SV1.
Secondly, the SV1 is under incredible pressure abroad from NEC/Fujitsu, both of which are superior in performance and inferior in price.
Thirdly, ask any owner of a T90 if they would buy that machine again.
None of the Cray line was successful (e.g. profitable). One line barely broke even. They have a collective ego of unimaginable proportions.
Good luck Tera a.k.a CRI, you are going to need it.
Thanks for the post, AC. It's great to see perspectives from both sides of the line.
An SGI desktop for X windows is one of the best things that ever happened to me.. (typing this on a r4400 Indy)Irix has a few more advantages then its graphics abilities (which are mostly a hardware matter anyway)
One of the more practical areas where it still does a lot better then Linux is in its realtime behavior.
Its very low latency for realtime applications really show off when you are working with audio and video recording/playback and the like.
Tho my x86 based machines have much more raw cpu power then my indy, and outperform its graphics in raw speed easily, my indy still beats them over the head as soon as things get stressed a bit... run some OpenGL stuff thats to big for my pc and it will look messy and esp the framerate when animating things changes so much that things look bad.
Running the same thing on my indy will cause it to display at an even lower rate then my pc, but it manages to at least actually display a vieable animation (tho at a low but very constant framerate)
As a development platform I prefer either Linux or one of the *BSDs, but as a machine to manipulate media files, and as a general purpose graphics 'terminal' I really love a SGI workstation running Irix.
Libux will need another major rewrite to catch up with Irix on issues like scalability and realtime latency. It will have a hard time to stay anywhere near Linux as a general purpose development, experimentation and networking platform however. Getting Linux people to actively support them is a huge thing they seem to hope to get from donating to the Linux comunity, and imho they deserve such support. They make mistakes like everyone, but at least I think their intentions aren't that bad. But then, the same seems to be true for IBM nowadays... strange world we live in... one day we could even end up with MS trying to donate to the open source comunity...
On another note... say people insist that the whole idea behind donating things to the open source comunity by sgi is just a way to take revenge by making as much of the companies knowlage available to the open source comunity as possible before they go bankrupt. This would deprive their compatitors of the option to buy the technology when things explode.
I for one do't subscribe to that view if only because I can't really match it with the amount of efford they put into getting theri stuff to work with Linux... looks like they are serious enough there.
How does swapping to a RAMdisk make any sense
It's clever people like you that make trolling fun. No one else even noticed that.
--af
I used to work for a company in the UK called Cray Communications (part of Cray Electronics). I think it was bigger than Cray Research, but obviously people got confused... ("You work for Cray?")
I left them ages ago. They are now called Anite.
(Sorry for the slightly off topic post - I thought you *might* be interested)
SF and Computing Book Reviews from : http://www.DiverseBooks.com