Slashdot Mirror


First Pix From New Dune Miniseries

Killjoy_b writes, "Dune fans never had it so good. First Frank Herbert's son's new Dune: House Atreides book came out in February and now there is a new Dune miniseries in the making. You can check out the pics at this Science Fiction Film Site. The page itself is German. Enjoy. " You know where the fish is.Tim sent this additional page of info. In English.

38 of 166 comments (clear)

  1. Won't get fooled again. by ucblockhead · · Score: 2
    When I was something like 16 years old, I raced to the theater on opening day, excited that my favorite book ever was now going to be a movie, which big stars like "Sting" in it.

    Those of you that have actually seen the original "Dune" movie can likely guess how the rest of that day went.

    So I'm not going to do that again. Until I hear that this has won an emmy or something, I am not even going to think about watching.

    --
    The cake is a pie
    1. Re:Won't get fooled again. by ucblockhead · · Score: 2
      An Emmy? Oy ... Are most shows you watch emmy-winners?

      Yes, actually.

      The only shows I watch with any regularity are "The Simpson", "The X Files", "Futurama" and "Win Ben Stein's Money". Three out of four are emmy winners.

      (And yes, I know it might suck even winning an emmy. But the odds that it doesn't improve.)

      --
      The cake is a pie
  2. Re:Great! by Keith+Russell · · Score: 2
    On which network would this mini series air on? Sci-Fi?
    Yessiree, Bob! Sci Fi has been talking about this for a couple years, and they started promoting it during their "Sci2K" campaign this past December. So we can probably expect to see it premier during the fall sweeps.

    As long it's closer in quality to Farscape than Welcome To Paradox, I'll be happy. Anything's better than Lynch's long, strange trip.

    Keith Russell
    OS != Religion
    --
    This sig intentionally left blank.
  3. babelfish translation by dlc · · Score: 2

    "On 22 November 1999 begin towards in Prague the turning work for a 6-stuendige TV filming of the novel " the desert planet " (" Dune ") of franc Herbert. The TV project budgetierte with 20 million US Dollar can offer thereby a hochkaraetigen occupation and crew.

    Thus William Hurt (out " draws in space ", " Dark admits town center " among other things or also " to to the end of the world ") took over the role of the duke Leto Atreides, which will have to be seen Italian actors Giancarlo Giannini as Imperator Shaddam IV and to Ian McNeice as a bad baron Harkonnen.

    Barbara Kodetova plays charismatischen Paul Atreides, the main figure of the film as Chani at the page of Alec Newman, that represents. With Uwe ox farmhand, who embodies the Fremenfuehrer very convincingly, is represented also a German actor in this internationally filled production.

    The film script to " desert planet " wrote John Harrison, which leads also direction; executing producers are Richard P. Rubinstein and Mitchell Galin. The line of the camera work took over the three-way Oskar winner Vittorio Storaro (Apocalypse Now). The marvelous kostuementwuerfe come from Theodor Pistek (won a Oskar for the costumes in Amadeus). Additionally the special effect conductor Ernest Farino and the production designer Miljen Kreka Kljakovic is involved in the project. The digital trick effects will come from three of studios, among them AREA 51 and nice one digital (Babylon 5).

    " Dune " produced of new Amsterdam Entertainment Inc., the Scifi Channel and KirchMedia in co-operation with tandem Communications. The US Austrahlung is planned for the last quarter 2000, in Germany the television filming in the spring 2001 to see will be (thus only little later).

    World-exclusively SF Film.de can show the first photos of the set and the turning work here now. Thank you for it at Torsten Dewi!


    Cthulhu for President!
    --
    (darren)
  4. Re:Hope The mini-series is better than the movie by Ed+Avis · · Score: 2

    If you've read the book, you probably won't like the film. This is true for most book-based films, not just Dune.

    I saw the film without having read the book, and I thought it was okay. A bit bizarre, but okay.

    So maybe you're just expecting too much if you want the film to be faithful to, or as good as, the book it's based on.

    --
    -- Ed Avis ed@membled.com
  5. Geek Metaphors by gnarphlager · · Score: 3

    Most people fail to realize, but Dune is very important in geek culture for the self-referential metaphors. All geeks realize the importance of self-reference. Take, for example, this post on Slashdot discussing metaphors in Dune. It CLEARLY references itself, and thus gives a good example of self-reference. It also uses the expression "self-reference" more times than any valid post should. But I digress.

    I'm sure you understand the relationship to the freemen and free software. Though it's been quite a while since I've read the book, I seem to recall "freemen" being spelled with only two "e"s. I could be wrong though, so I choose to continue spelling it logically. If I'm going to look stupid, which I often do (I point your attention to my recent post on slashdot regarding Geek Metaphors in Dune), then at least I'm going to admit it, and look stupid in my own special way. But I digress.

    The freemen live in caves in the desert in the Dune books. They are unwashed and seen as lunatics by the more civilized Houses. This is clearly a metaphor for free software programmers. The desert, however, is to be taken literally. Most free software programmers live in caves in the desert. I mean, it only stands to reason. Believe it or not, those caves are mighty chilly, and saves trouble of cooling the server rooms. Though nothing is quite like the pleasure of an ice cold server room. Set aside getting out of summer heat, it lets you wear your all too geeky Mr.Rodgers-esque sweater all year round. I don't know about you, but I certainly like sweaters. But I digress.

    And then there are the sandworms. Giant beasts that burrows through the soil. If ever there has been an obvious metaphor for worm-type viruses, this is it. And worm viruses would not exist without people to program them. Sure, that sort of thing might be a good way to understand how protocols and programming works, but any good hacker grows out of that stuff after high school. Angst-fueled education seems to be very prevailent. But the important thing is to not regret it. Sure, I'm not PROUD of alot of the things I've done in the past, and I'd never do it again, but I DID do it. There's nothing that can be accomplished by feeling sorry about everything I've ever done. Take for example the time that I found the dying man behind the 7-11. Yeah, I could have, and likely should have called an ambulance. But I hadn't eaten in a few days, and truth be told I was dead broke. If I had spent more time programming useful software, instead of releasing everything "free", then maybe I could have bought a taco or two. But no one was around, and I made sure not to leave any fingerprints. And it gave me a chance to use that new meatloaf pan my mother bought me for my birthday. Oh, mother, what you don't know . . .

    But I digress. Cheese is pretty.

    --

    Bad things often happen to good people,
    It is up to them to see that they remain good.
  6. Text of the article (In English) by erpbridge · · Score: 3

    Through www.dictionary.com/translate (Babelfish was hosed)... tried to English-ify it as much as possible:

    1. March 2000 - Author: Florian Breitsameter
    DUNE Miniseries: The first pictures of the set!

    On 22 November 1999 work in Prague began towards filming for a 6-hour TV filming of the novel " The Desert Planet " ("Dune"), by Frank Herbert. The TV project has a $20 million budget(US), which can offer thereby a hochkaraetigen occupation and crew.

    William Hurt ("Lost In Space", "Dark City" and also "Until The End Of The World") plays the role of the Duke Leto Atreides, which will have to be seen. The film will also feature Italian actors Giancarlo Giannini as Imperator Shaddam IV and to Ian McNeice as a bad baron Harkonnen.

    Alec Newman plays Paul Atreides, the main figure of the film. Barbara Kodetova plays Chani, at the page of Alec Newman. With Uwe Ochsenknecht, who embodies the Fremen Leader very convincingly, is represented also a German actor in this internationally filled production.

    The film script to "desert planet" was written by John Harrison, who also directs; executive producers are Richard P. Rubinstein and Mitchell Galin. The camera work is done by the three-time Oscar winner Vittorio Storaro (Apocalypse Now).

    The marvelous costumes come from Theodor Pistek (obtained a Oscar for the costumes at Amadeus). Additionally the special effect conductor Ernest Farino and the production designer Miljen Kreka Kljakovic are involved in the project. The digital special effects will come from three of studios, among them AREA 51 and One Digital (Babylon 5).

    " Dune " is produced by Amsterdam Entertainment Inc., the Scifi Channel and KirchMedia tandem Communications. The US airing is planned for the Fall 2000, in Germany the television airing will air in Spring 2001 (thus only little later).

    World-exclusively SF Film.de can show the first photos of the set and the fiming work here now. Thank you for it at Torsten Dewi!

    Captions
    Reverend Mother Ramallo (?), (Uwe Ochsenknecht) and Jessica (Saskia Reeves)

    Gurney Halleck (P.H. Moriaty), an assassin (?), Paul Atreides (Alec Newman) and (Uwe Ochsenknecht)

    Chani (Barbara Kodetova) and Paul Atreides (Alec Newman)

    (Uwe Ochsenknecht) with blue eyes!

    Richard Rubinstein(producer) and John Harrison (director) in the set for the Siege

    Vittorio Storaro (camera) and Uwe Ochsenknecht in the background

    Source: SFW, audio 51, Torsten Dewi, Victor television Productions, Inc..

  7. Futuristic Potato Farmers? by MikeM · · Score: 2

    Why does everyone in those pictures look like a futuristic potato farmer? Its almost as if sometime in the 22nd century everyone decided that drab, brown and baggy was how the future was supposed to look. Hell, even the lady with the scepter looks like she just got finished digging up some roots.

    Give these poor people some style! Where's the royalty? Where's the sleek, efficiency of a Fremen stillsuit? The ones in there look like leftovers from the local Salvation Army.

    -MM

    --
    (Yes I work for NSI. No I don't pretend to speak for them since they don't pretend to speak for me.)
  8. Re:Great! by slashdot-terminal · · Score: 2

    Yessiree, Bob! Sci Fi has been talking about this for a couple years, and they started promoting it during their "Sci2K" campaign this past December. So we can probably expect to see it premier during the fall sweeps.

    One minor question for people. Assuming I didn't want to get all of cable but say only pay for one channel (bet you can't guess) could I do it? I currently don't have a cable installation yet but I think it might be worth it in the future.

    --
    Slashdot social engineering at it's finest
  9. Re:Hope The mini-series is better than the movie by ucblockhead · · Score: 2
    Well, you can rely on cheesy special effects, or you can rely on acting, context and the viewer's intelligence.

    "These aren't the droids you're looking for".

    --
    The cake is a pie
  10. Why the Dune movie failed by Ted+V · · Score: 2

    The Dune movie failed purely on bad directing. I believe it was directed by the same guy who did "Twin Peaks" and "Lost Highway", although his name escapes me. While those two are cult classics, they're _not_ intended for mainsteam consumption, not even mainstream Sci-Fi lovers.

    Consider the dubious solution to the perspective in the book. If you remember, Dune had many sections where you'd read the character's thoughts, and this helped understand the character's movitations. But this doesn't work in a movie setting, so the director did the thoughts as "voice overs". It ended up as a bad directing choice.

    So hopefully the producers will learn from their mistakes.

    -Ted

    1. Re:Why the Dune movie failed by malikcoates · · Score: 2

      The Dune movie failed purely on bad directing. I believe it was directed by the same guy who did "Twin Peaks" and "Lost Highway", although his name escapes me. ...

      Silly Rabbit!


      The credits for Dune list the director as Alan Smithee. Alan Smithee is a psuedoname that directors use when the studio fucks them over. David Lynch, who has done some great movies including Blue Velvet and Wild At Heart, never actually completed Dune. After he ran over budget, the studio took his work and did what they liked with it. Imagine if the studio had done the editting on The Godfather or Titanic...

    2. Re:Why the Dune movie failed by B'Trey · · Score: 2

      Baron Harkonnen was decadent and twisted. He was also extremely shrewd and dangerous. In the movie, he was simply a perverted buffoon. That movie was an abomination and no amount of directing or editing could have saved it. Heartplugs! Sheesh.

      --

      "The legitimate powers of government extend only to such acts as are injurious to others." Thomas Jefferson.

    3. Re:Why the Dune movie failed by ralphclark · · Score: 2

      The movie was directed by David Lynch (Erasorhead, The Elephant Man, Blue Velvet, Twin Peaks, Wild at Heart). All of these were masterpieces of direction. Although Lynch's movie of Dune wasn't everyone's cup of tea, the theatrical release was at the very least, a competent piece of cinematography.

      Most complaints about the film stem from the unavoidable fact that it isn't the book. Lynch did make a brave effort to capture the essence of the novel by allowing the characters' thoughts to be heard. But what so many fail to realise is that Dune contained very little dialogue and very little action; most of the text was introspection. Consequently it cannot be rendered into a film of less than 12 hours length without making substantial cuts.

      Whether the "voice-over" method works or not is a matter of opinion. I was very familiar with the book before I saw the film and I *had* wondered how they were going to deal with that. Lynch chose to tackle it head-on. Not surprising really because there *is* no workable alternative. Either you let us hear the characters' thoughts or you leave it out completely turning it into an action flick, or you invent a whole lot of dialogue to discover their thoughts in connversation, turning all the major characters into garrulous clowns. Only the first of these has any chance of remaining faithful to the book. For me, at any rate, I thought the Director did the best that could be done with the material.

      BTW, The direction credit for the TV release of this movie went to "Alan Smithee". What happened is, the studio drastically re-edited the film for TV release. Lynch was furious about this and demanded that his name be taken off it. When this happens, the "Alan Smithee" name is traditionally used.


      Consciousness is not what it thinks it is
      Thought exists only as an abstraction

    4. Re:Why the Dune movie failed by ralphclark · · Score: 2

      Oh and BRW I wish people would stop flaming the movie; that's a sure fire way to piss the director off and get the movie buried. I still hope to see a "Director's Cut" on widescreen DVD some day.

      Consciousness is not what it thinks it is
      Thought exists only as an abstraction

  11. Re:Hope The mini-series is better than the movie by slashdot-terminal · · Score: 2

    Well, you can rely on cheesy special effects, or you can rely on acting, context and the viewer's intelligence.

    Well from what I know about film (ok I am not an actor but I know a few things) you simply would employ the same type of technique that is used for the internal thoughts of characters where you have a voice being spoken and the rest of the speech being either muted or muffled to allow for the omniscience factor.

    --
    Slashdot social engineering at it's finest
  12. Re:Hope The mini-series is better than the movie by dillon_rinker · · Score: 2

    Frank Herbert was involved in the production of the movie, and approved of it. He told a different story in a different media. The two stories shared major characters and thematic elements. You are absolutely correct when you say that the book should have taken six hours as a movie, but the ecomonic realities don't permit this. Quite frankly, I think the first book is almost meaningless without the context of its two sequels. That's 18 hours of movie for you; almost a prime-time dramatic series.

  13. This looks wrong. by veldrane · · Score: 3

    Personally, I'm a pretty big Dune fan but this just looks messed up.

    The spice is supposed to give the Fremen "blue within blue" eyes...perhaps it just a budget thing but it just looked like they just hired the "Aryan Nation Acting Troupe".

    The attire: This is a planet where the Terran Sahara desert would be considered a water-rich oasis. The images portray people running around in Xena-esque garb, which is wrong. Could someone point out one of the images where someone is wearing a stilsuit? To make it worse, one of the images has Paul bare-chested! Talk about that sacrilege of water wasting! (Ok, they could be inside one of the water-tight fremen shelters but still! The suit is an important symbol in the Fremen culture.) No stilsuits and some of them are wearing heavy, cumbersome clothing.

    Blades: Traditional Fremen daggers are made from the teeth of sandworms, if I remember correctly. So perhaps Gurney was wielding an off-world weapon?

    Fremen: I know looks can be deceiving but these people need to look somewhat like desert hardened survivalists. Supposedly they can take out the Padishah Emperor's Sardukar terror troops. I don't see that here.

    All I see is series that may do a few cross-overs with the Hercules-Xena series and all the good guys do flips and acrobatics to take out the bad guys in a non-lethal (and comedic) manner. The fremen are killers, pure and simple. Nothing too personal, its just a basic fact of survival. Even children are taught how to kill at an early age. The survivor of a dagger duel dessicates the loser and keeps the water. The survivor also gains all possessions and marital ties of the loser. I wonder if that will come into play in this series as well?

    I hate to be pessimistic but I'll give it the benefit of the doubt and try to watch it if it shows in my area. If they butcher either genre (movie or book) I'll be one who won't watch it again.

    -Vel

  14. Re:Hope The mini-series is better than the movie by ucblockhead · · Score: 2
    There's a movie of "War and Peace" that is supposed to be extremely good, done back in the silent film era. It is something like twelve hours long, though.

    Anyway, what they are squabbling over is an addictive drug that can provide the prescience needed to navigate hyperspace or somesuch. A little more interesting than just "spaceship fuel".

    There have been some good adaptions of books. The most famous in SF is probably Bladerunner, though it wasn't particularly faithful to the book. But on the whole, they tend to be bad because the directors are rarely people who actually like the book in the first place. (Probably the root problem in the original "Dune".)

    The real interesting adaption to wait for is Peter Jackson's Lord of the Rings. I've heard very positive things about that.

    --
    The cake is a pie
  15. Re:Hope The mini-series is better than the movie by ucblockhead · · Score: 2
    Or you could just have the actor say it, Like Alec Guinness did in "Star Wars", and not worry about using special effects at all.

    --
    The cake is a pie
  16. The biggest reason was... by Randy+Rathbun · · Score: 2

    Dino De Laurentiis.

    Think about it. DDL brought us such wonderful movies as Barbarella, King Kong, King Kong Lives (where they give King Kong an artificial heart!), and last, but not least, Danger: Diabolik, which was the last episode of MST3K.

    DDL must be stopped! One can not trust a man who lets a line like "Is that stud coming?" get into a film!

    The only person who could possibly be worse is Irwin Allen.

  17. It was cut by birder · · Score: 2

    I watched the movie before reading the book and was completely confused. But from what I now gather the film was badly cut. The new release which I think Sci-fi shows is the 'directors cut' and apparently makes for a better moive.

  18. Impressions of Dune... by Masem · · Score: 2
    "Dune" the original book, is one of the top sci-fi books of all time. Yes, there's a heck of a lot of detail in the first 100 pages, but the universe that Dune exists in is completely different than that of ours that without this detail, we may miss key points later in the book. The ideas present a odd feulism-like society, where a tiny tiny tiny fraction of the population control the power, even less that the European feudlism, and how the various Houses scheme and plan to get a head of each other, not caring for the life that are placed in danger of their plans. And then it all falls down to one thing; longevity as controlled by the spice.

    If you haven't tried reading Dune, or tried and failed several years ago, definitely try again. Sure, it's not an easy read, but the impressions that Frank has written into it are deep.

    Stating that, avoid any of the other Dune books. Like most sci-fi novels, one book is planned, but the author is pressured to write more, and this definitely shows in the latter books. The style is less harse, and is actually an easier read-- which IMO is a failing (compare Neuromancer to Mona Lisa Overdrive, as another example).

    And, as everyone else here as put, the Movie sucked, at least the 2 hrs that were put to the theater. Even the directors cut is lakcing something that the book itself had.

    --
    "Pinky, you've left the lens cap of your mind on again." - P&TB
    "I can see my house from here!" - ST:
  19. Re:Hope The mini-series is better than the movie by Ed+Avis · · Score: 2

    When you say the movie was 'horrific' do you mean that it was a bad movie, or just that it mutilated the book?

    BTW the game Dune II is (I think) even less faithful to the book, but it's a damn good game.

    --
    -- Ed Avis ed@membled.com
  20. Frank Herbert disagrees with you... by devphil · · Score: 3
    Like most sci-fi novels, one book is planned, but the author is pressured to write more, and this definitely shows in the latter books.

    Read the foreward that Herbert wrote for one of the later volumes. He talked about how he planned out many of the novels before sitting down to write the first one, and how certain scenes had to be shifted between the books.

    Doesn't sound to me like he was pressured into more...

    --
    You cannot apply a technological solution to a sociological problem. (Edwards' Law)
  21. Das boot by szyzyg · · Score: 2

    Uwe Ochsenknecht - you may also have seen him in "The Greatest Submarine Movie Ever" 'Das Boot' - another production which should feature in geek movie collections.

  22. Re:Great! by legoboy · · Score: 2

    Nobody asked for it, but I'll write another mini-review of _Dune: House Atreides_ here simply because I feel that those who read it without reading the other books (Especially the final two, which many people seem to not have ever read - Heretics of Dune, Chapterhouse: Dune) may come away wondering why the series is among, if not in fact, the best that science fiction has to offer.

    The new book, supposed prequel to _Dune_, by Brian Herbert and Kevin J. Anderson (of Star Wars book fame) isn't exactly a great work of literature. However, if you're just looking for more "real Dune stuff" (KJA actually referred to the book as such), you may as well give it a read.

    The novel itself, though, is rife with contraditions of the later books, extremely poorly developed characters, excessive verbiage, a simple plot which derives a major gimmick from a Star Trek movie, and a tendacy to leave no action unexplained. What is wrong with the latter, you may ask. The simple fact is that the books by Frank Herbert required you to think. The prequel does not. This is akin to why _The Great Gatsby_ is considered such a great work. Many characters are portrayed vastly different from what the earlier books demand. Fenring, as a blood-thirsty murderer, rather than a cultured assassin. Paul's grandfather as a doting old man, rather than the steel-hard leader who is implied. Nevermind the Ixians who did not necessarily exist at this time, the Tleilaxu whose faith seems common knowledge, the Harkonnen as evil. The last is simply wrong. The Harkonnen were ruthless, but not evil. Frank Herbert liked shades of grey, no matter what the surface appearence. Why else did he spend the second book tearing Paul down from the pedestal. My whole point is that _Dune: House Atreides_ detracts from the series by Frank Herbert, and its only genuine redeeming point is that it will cause some number of those who read it to pick up the other books in the Dune Chronicals.

    I encourage you to read Amazon.com's customer reviews if you're interested in more. Some love the book, bur you see the others who are critical of it for many of the same reasons as myself. Also note that there is both a newsgroup and mailing list where serious discussion is welcome.

    ------

    --
    If a tree falls on an anonymous coward yelling 'first post' in the forest, does anybody hear?
  23. Re:Great! by remande · · Score: 2
    The biggest contradiction I saw is that, in Dune: House Atreides, the fact that melange is used for navigation is public knowledge. While it was in the movie, I don't believe it was in the book. Indeed, one of Paul's trump cards was understanding that you used melange for navigation, because he threatened the Guild with revealing the secret.

    That secret is the only reason that the Guild monopoly existed. If it was known, the Corrinos would start hording Melange and experimenting with it, and break the Guild monopoly.

    --

    --The basis of all love is respect

  24. Re:Six Hours? No. by Dredd13 · · Score: 2
    OK, this particular subject keeps coming up. There IS NO six-hour version of the movie. No, you didn't ever see it on TV, Sci-Fi channel has never show the "six hour version" and no, your friend's friend didn't REALLY see it on VHS.

    There are TWO versions of the movie. The one in the theaters that ran around 2 hours, and a "longer" version (NOT a directors' cut, you'll notice Lynch's name was removed from this print at his request) that has a different intro, a formal "narrator", and while it explains things a little bit more, it's just more "kludgy".

    The "Six Hour Dune Movie" is an urban legend.

    D

  25. Re:Hope The mini-series is better than the movie by otis+wildflower · · Score: 2

    I saw all versions of the Dune film before I ever read the book. I did love the book, particularly because of its detail and character development, but there are a lot of things I like in the Smithee version (the "full" version, with voiceover, the painting montage at the start, the juicing of the baby worm, etc) and feel it's truest to the novel.

    Still, I thought the films downplayed Stilgar too much, and Feyd Rautha was definitely shafted (he went from a hardass to a whiny petulant little snit).

    OTOH I actually _liked_ the weirding modules (thoughts being equivalent to actions) and I thought Lynch really nailed the imagery and ambience in a way that very few other directors could. The whole Yueh scene with 'The tooth.. The tooth..' could have been lifted right out of Blue Velvet, and I mean that in the best possible way.. Lynch also handled Paul's visions very well IMHO, better than most directors I could imagine..

    I'd love to see Lynch do a TV miniseries of Dune if he could be lured back to the small screen.. Guy's a friggin genius...

    Your Working Boy,

  26. Re:Worm interpretation by sjames · · Score: 2

    Interesting, I always thought the worms represented Microsoft, not viruses.

    That can't be. No product of Microsoft has ever expanded anyone's abilities. The Baron would be a better analogy. Consider, free software has been growing bit by bit over the years, and Microsoft was only dimly aware of it right up to the Jihad.

  27. Re:You're just fooling yourself... by B.+Samedi · · Score: 2

    Alright. So replying to AC's is about as useful as yelling at the wall when the cat makes me mad but...

    Yes, the movie was entertaining. If you've never read the book that is or if decent acting isn't too high up on your list of things to expect from a good movie. Let's start with the most glaring example.

    The weirding devices. Cheesy. Really cheesy. The Fremen didn't need some little box with a handle to be badasses... they already where! Remember the book "We lost two of our men for three platoons of theirs. Seems a fair trade." (refering to fighting Sadakkar [I know I mispelled that]) The Fremen as a rule were ruthless and tough. You're telling me some offworld kid shows up, teaches them to shout oddly whilst holding a box and suddenly they can't be beat? Paul was needed to be their leader not show them how to fight. They could already do that. Never mind that the whole point of the weirding way was that humans could do it only their bodies (remember the jihad they talk about that removed computing machines?). It's a pretty cheap cop out to assume your audience won't figure it out without some techno gimmick to explain it.

    And what was up with Paul's sister in the movie? She looked like a evil muppet or something and the voice sounded like they gave that little girl some helium and asked her to talk even higher.

    Let's not even get too deep into the stillsuits. Never mind that leaving your whole freaking head exposed is a quick way to get sunstroke on a Earth desert much less a planet that is entirely desert. Also the fact that you do loose a large amount of sweat through your mouth. Or how about wearing all black out in the blazing sun(s)? If they were that worried about not being able to tell who was who how about some marks on the suits? It wouldn't have been that hard.

    Let's be honest. The first twenty minutes or so were decent and then it came to a screeching grinding halt. If you show that much contempt for the material that it comes from where you don't even really try to show the novel correctly then you probably shouldn't be making a movie about it (like Star Ship Troopers but that's a whole other post). The movie wasn't a visual feast by any stretch of the word. It showed nothing really new from sci-fi and nothing sticks with me from the movie (aside the giant worms and they weren't even that hot).

    I hope that the mini-series is better. Judging by the shots it will at least look better but I'm hoping for it to stick to the story. Maybe I wish too much.


  28. Re:Six Hours? No. by Dredd13 · · Score: 2

    That might make sense, because its easy to have that happen (for example, film a six minute battle scene from five cameras... there's a half-hour of work-print footage) I could accept that as where the rumors and stuff started. Somewhere at home I have the "Making of Dune" book that came out when they made the movie (which says nothing about a "really really long version", which you would think it would do if there was such a beast). I'll have to see if they mention the work-print thing in there....

  29. we'll see..... by mackga · · Score: 2

    I for one was excited when the movie came out, and after watching it for a bit nearly gagged on my popcorn! I've read the entire set: Dune - Chapterhouse Dune at least three times over the years, and I still think it's only beaten by LOTR. I sure hope the mini-series gets something of the vastness, the seriousnes, without the fake bs in the movie, of the tale. Things that really pushed me over the edge about the movie:

    The utter ridiculousness of the Sadukar! Jesus-H-Christonacrutch! These fellas were THE bad ass elite killer-soldiers of the Emperor of the Known fscking Universe. All the other Houses were scared shitless of them. Anybody gets fancy ideas - just whisper Sadukar. 'Nuff said. And the movie had them dressed up like chemical disposal workers!

    The module-thingies. Nope, no way. Fighting had devolved into hand-to-hand + personal shields. That was pretty much glossed and forgotten.

    Scenery: the movie gave me a sense of a bunch of folks on a soundstage - not outside, and not on a desert planet.

    Anyway, maybe this series will do a better job. I hope so.

    --

    "shop smart:shop s-mart" ash

  30. Details of the Dune long version by Otto · · Score: 3

    Here's a good page to get all the info:

    http://pages.infinit.net/bonesnet/Smithee.htm

    Here's a quick rundown:

    -DUNE was originally released to theatres at Christmas of 1984 in Todd-AO/70MM with a running time of 137 minutes.

    -It is obvious that David Lynch shot a lot more footage than what we saw in the theatrical print. Lynch himself envisioned a four-hour epic film. Unfortunately, Universal wanted a running time that would be more accessible to its audience since three-hour- and four-hour-plus films were not currently popular in the 1980s. So the studio had Lynch re-edit the film to its 137-minute theatrical version.

    -At one point in 1984, Lynch had announced he was going to release a legitimate "special edition director's cut" on home video, but decided to move on to other projects such as "Blue Velvet". Soon, word and rumor about the extra footage had spread everywhere, and by the time DUNE had finished its original cable run on HBO, Universal felt that the time had come to produce a "special edition" of their own, and the result was released to television in May of 1988.

    -David Lynch was unhappy with what MCA TV had done and did not approve of this edition. So thus it was he successfully petitioned to take his name off the credits and replaced it with "Allen Smithee", the standard Directors Guild of America pseudonym for directors who do not want credit for their own work.

    -This first TV version of DUNE, pieced together under the (mis)guiding hand of Harry Tapelman, Vice President of MCA TV Special Projects, was originally created for the Turner networks, but instead released to syndication in 1988 on the Universal Pictures Debut Network (which also was responsible for the slightly expanded version of "Legend", and the severely edited version of "Brazil"). Although Universal touted this as having "more than 50 minutes of never-before-seen footage", this actually contained 35 minutes of unseen footage. The remaining 15 contained the repeated main and end credits, a newly shot prologue, and so-called "new" scenes fabricated from outtake and test footage.

    A complete list of the changes made is available at the web page I mentioned above.


    ---

    --
    - Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set him on fire and he's warm for the rest of his life.
  31. It can't be any worse... by CaptainCarrot · · Score: 2
    ...and from the look of the stills, it will be orders of magnitude better than that horrendous movie.

    Still, I could wish that the Fremen looked more like the Arabs they were supposed to resemble, except for their blue eyes. But you can't have everything, and it seems to me that this miniseries will give quite a lot. I can actually identify which scene in the book the stills came from. Try doing that with the movie!

    --
    And the brethren went away edified.
  32. Re: by JamesKPolk · · Score: 2

    Paul! What are you doing?

    um..

    I told you, Never keep your back to the door! If you're going to be downloading porn, everyone can see it, unless you face the door!

    Thufir. yes, I'm sorry.

    As I'm sure you've figured out.. we have been training you to become a Hacker. And most hackers do end up doing such things... Have some courtesy though!

  33. Re:But the stereotype is mostly accurate... by Tet · · Score: 2
    three of those bands you mention are fucking Nazis who are banned in Germany

    Wow. Care to tell me which three? Stratovarius, Rhapsody and Sonata Arctica are all coming to Germany in April, and are returning in May. The chances of them being banned are extremely slim. Similarly, Hammerfall have played in Germany recently, and given the size of their fanbase there, I expect them to return fairly soon. Do you want to enlighten us as to just why you think they're Nazis? Oh, BTW, Heavy Metal and skinheads are very rarely two thing that accompany each other. My hair's almost down to my ass... :-)

    --
    "The invisible and the non-existent look very much alike." -- Delos B. McKown