Ythonpay 1.6 Eleaseray Eduleschay

uffbeerday iteswray: "Erethay isyay ayay 1.6 ersionvay ofyay Ythonpay inyay alphayay. Inyay additionyay, eythay avehay ayay eduleschay orfay uturefay eleasesray andyay omesay arningsway aboutyay odecay eakagebray expectedyay ithway osethay eleasesray. Ityay ookslay ikelay ethay ocumentationday illway aglay ethay eleasesray ayay itbay." Apparentlyyay, ityay illway eakbray omesay odecay. Ethay eleaseray otesnay escribeday emthay asyay "olklorefay APIsyay (atthay ereway evernay ocumentedday oryay endorsedyay utbay everthelessnay ereway acceptedyay andyay inyay ommoncay useyay)." Ethay otesnay onyay 1.6 alsoyay aylay outyay anyay ambitousyay oadmapray owardtay Ythonpay 3000.

Comments

Fuck. This is *HUGE* news.

[torpor]

I sincerely hope this isn't an April Fools joke, because if so it will go down in history as one of the most tasteless practical jokes on the Internet. Then again, I fucking hope this is a joke.

IF in fact Andover are suing these sites for this so-called 'copyright' and 'patent', then that is the end of Slashdot.org. For good.

There's not a geek out there who, having witnessed and participated in the many "Your Rights Online" articles posted to Slashdot over the last year or so, will not protest this unbelievably stupid action on the part of Andover.net.

There could be nothing more destructive than incurring the wrath of the Free Geek, and slapping sites like Advogado and Kuro5hin with an injunction for copying the 'look and feel' of Slashdot is a *HUGE* fucking mistake. Huge.

If this is a joke, it sucks.

If its not a joke, then *Heads Must Roll* at Andover for this, and there must be a widely-publicized retraction. If I don't hear about this retraction on *CNN*, then I will be seriously pissed off at Andover's control of its PR staff, and I will withdraw my investment, never to invest in Andover or any company helmed by its executive staff again.

And if this is just a bad joke, its fucked.

Oh man, thank god its just a joke.

[torpor]

Phew. I'm the April Fool. No underwear for me tomorrow.

But man, seriously, that's gotta be the harshest April Fools joke I've ever seen. Not only was it posted a day early (March 31st), but it *actually* seemed plausible.

Thank god for April Fools. Phew! Nice one guys...

Google's April Fool is much funnier

[mattbee]

Go see...

Again, Timothy?

[OOG_THE_CAVEMAN]

Dear Sir,

I am aware of the fact that I have stated this complaint in the prior article, and I am wondering whether you even cared to read it, or it blew it off like it was nothing. However, I must say that I was dreadfully serious in regards in to this April Fool's Day practice of yours. In all gravity, this joke has been stretched well beyond the bounds of light humor, and now comes across as merely nothing more than a juvenile prank.

For what reason do you refuse to return to the standard normal and articulate posting method of old. Even for a temporary one day departure, the joke has already grown well old beyond its lifespan, and I beg you to consider allowing it to die a dignified death.

Moreover, I cannot help but voice my concerns about how your childish joke will reflect upon the status of slashdot. Slashdot has been viewed for a long time as a premier supplier of quality technological news, cultural news, and opinions. It is a site that myself and others treat with the highest of respect. I swear upon my soul that I have never and would never dream of tainting slashdot's wonderous content by posting something inarticulate and hard to understand. Please reconsider this, timothy. You see, other major bodies also view slashdot as a center for information gathering. Tech companies and key open source figures pay heavy attention to this site and expect the dignity that it normally has. Worse, our political activism raised by this site could be in danger. The MPAA, RIAA, and other figures that stand in the way of the promise of open source, will no doubt use your April Fool's Day article in court battles over laws to dismiss claims on slashdot as juvenile and childish. And if they are able to paint a picture of the community as puerile, I shudder when I think of the greater influence they could exert and the potential destruction of open source liberties.

I hate to repeat myself, timothy, but I am shocked and appalled by your utter refusal to heed my serious words of warning. You are threatening slashdot's reputation, the reputation of many visitors and posters, and even the open source movement itself with your callow attempts at humor. Whats next, timothy? An article posted in all capital letters that sounds like neanderthal gibberish (TIMOTHY POST GOOD ARTICLE ON SLASHDOT!!! TIMOTHY BREAK HEAD!!!)? Please say it isn't so, timothy. For the sake of everyone involved, please cease with your activity and return slashdot to its status quo. It isn't too late to compensate for your prior mistakes. You may have put the future of this site in danger, but you can still return to normal and prevent the utter destruction of slashdot and its ilk. Heed my words, sir, or else I will be forced to come over to your place of work or residence and physically shatter your cranial region.

Sincerely and Urgently,
OOG THE OPEN SOURCE CAVEMAN

OOG WISH HAPPY APRIL FOOL DAY!!!

Re:Babelfish

[51M02]

I am an expert in Latin Pig translation, Here is mine:

There is a 1.6 version of Python in alpha. In addition, they have a schedule for future releases and some warnings about code breakage expected with those releases. It looks like the documentation will lag the releases a bit. "Apparently, it will breaks some code. The release notes describe them as "folklore APIs (that were never documented or endorsed but nevertheless were accepted and in common use)." The notes on 1.6 also lay out any ambitous roadmap toward Python 3000.

Python 1.6 Release Schedule

[stx23]

uffbeerday iteswray: "Erethay isyay ayay 1.6 ersionvay ofyay Ythonpay inyay alphayay...

You're not planning on keeping this up all day are you?
It's gonna get old soon...
You might want to vary it a bit...

What really would've been cool is if...

[eyeball]

What really would've been cool is if they registered ashdotslay.org and redirected slashdot to it. I wonder if anyone would've noticed...