Autopsy Of A Furby
Cooper Stevenson writes: "Ever wonder what makes a Furby tick? Well, neither have I but it made for an interesting read." Personally, I'd rather see someone disembowel Teddy Ruxpin, but this is a good start.
← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)
Then again, is it really that big of a deal. Do any of us feel really all that violated when we have to see a post on something that we have already seen in the past. My point: Who cares!
The 400+ people with submissions in the queue that didn't see the light of day for that repost care.
--
http://slashdot.org/articles/99 /01/03/1950227.shtml
http://slashdot.org/articles/98 /12/11/2338244.shtml
It was in december 11, 1998...back when they were popular /12/11/2338244.shtml
http://slashdot.org/articles/98
I would totally agree that the stories themselves need to be moderated as well. There are some times where I wouldn't mind troll'n for some really off the wall stories, but if a story of earth-shattering news comes along (RedHat buys Microsoft OS Div for $10 Million, ect.) you may only want to see those top headlines.
/.
Consider this like the Sunday edition of the New York Times. Sure, there are some interesting stories in the back pages of the travel section, but should that be a "headline" story?
Besides... this is only a natural evolution of the posting moderation. That and the main editors (Rob & Co.) could still have "unlimited" story moderation points to pretty much put things where they want them anyway. It would allow the readers to put a little bit into how they feel about a story as well.
Anyways.... this story is truly stale news. The page info from the server says:
Last Modified: Sunday, August 01, 1999 06:33:45 PM Local time
Or even note that cross reference pages even have a link to
visit:
http://www.homestead.com/hackfurby/
This place is pretty cool, too. They are trying to document the IR protocol. It has software to control the furby with a computer.