DeCSS Defense Brief

Posted by michael on Thursday May 4, 2000 @06:55AM from the for-the-record dept.

John Young's excellent Cryptome site has posted a new salvo in the DeCSS conflict. The Defendant's Reply Brief to Linking Motion and Cross-Motion to Vacate Preliminary Injunction is a bit lengthy but contains all sorts of good information in the main document and in the Declarations attached from Harold Abelson, Andrew Appel, Chris DiBona, Bruce Fries, Martin Garbus, John Gilmore, Robin Gross, Lewis Kurlantzick, Eben Moglen, Matt Pavlovich, Bruce Schneier, Barbara Simons, Frank Stevenson, Dave Touretsky, David Wagner, and John Young.

1 of 7 comments (clear)

Min score:

Reason:

Sort:

A Bit Lengthy? by Jim+Tyre · 2000-05-04 05:53 · Score: 4

The Defendant's Reply Brief to Linking Motion and Cross-Motion to Vacate Preliminary Injunction is a bit lengthy
A bit lengthy?
Meaning no disrespect to my friend Michael, but the document was written to convince the Court, not slashdot readers. ;-)
This lawyer's view is that it does a nice job of that, though I hazard no predictions as to how Kaplan will view it.
Why is this story not on slashdot's top page?