Compaq Itsy Usability movies
Jón Ragnarsson writes "Compaq Western Research Lab has put some movies of the Itsy running Doom, Java, X and other stuff...
The ARM CPU still amazes me after all those years...
" My love affair with the itsy goes
way back to
stories
that we posted years ago. I even saw one at the 98 LinuxExpo. This is the box that we always wish would be mass produced, but just doesn't seem to ever get any closer. Its still cool tho.
Does anyone have an explanation for why Itsies can't be mass-produced? Because they're so cool. Is it because price is prohibitive? Or materials? Anyone know?
Switch the . and the @ to email me.
Such violence - I propose we ban fast computers immediately because they are violent(note to slashdot moderators: this is a joke). Violence is inherent in computers - look at how a computer is reviewed - invariably how fast it can run Quake is cited as the reason why it is superior to other computers(note to slashdot moderators: this is fact!). DOOM was the very same video game which compelled two teenagers to go on a shooting rampage in columbine(note to slashdot moderators: this is not flamebait)! We must act quickly - ban fast computers now! Go back to 286/25's and MS Flight Simulator 1.0(note to slashdot moderators: MSFS sucks). Churches unite! Oppose this menace to decency!
So, finally the Old Prophecy has come true (and it did way ahead of its time for this planet): an Interface has come, that allows you to command your radio with only but a simple gesture...
:)
:)
This is Good, for it will be the doom of the evil mouse and keyboard... Rejoice!
It's a pity though that we'll have to sit *very* still in order to view the whole pr0n collection we just downloaded uninterrupted by random scrolling...
Wander where Compaq R&D get their ideas from?
Flame On
Yes, I was wondering why they aren't moving more quickly toward the mass market. I do notice that the web page looks a lot slick than it did a few years ago (or so I remember anyhow).
There are probably several reasons that none of us can go out and buy one right now. Obviously the charter of the project says that the goal is to explore new interface innovations in hand-held computing--these guys are just doing research and development, not necessarily even looking for a commercial poduct. Also, I imagine that there may be some marketing thought the either consumers are not ready for such a device (the general consumer, I mean--I'm sure as hell ready) or that they need to exploit the market for stuff they already have out there more before moving on to something drastically better. Do you really think that Intel or AMD don't have some increadibly cool processors sitting around that aren't going to market for years because of stategy not technology reasons?
Anyhow, they provide directions on how to build your own itsy. I just signed up to have the url for the directions emailed to me. I wonder if interested Slashdoters could get some sort of bulk discount on the necessary parts?
Introducing: THE ITSYSLASH! cool.
In Indiana it is illegal to make a monkey smoke a cigarette.
Hey this is cool-
It looks like they are making all the source code, hardware specs, and other information availiable for download -I'm impressed! Does anybody out there have the time/resources to put one of these together?
-
air and light and time and space
It wouldn't be that hard to design a very stripped-down version of an X server to run on something like an Itsy. The problem with your 40M install of X is that the X you are installing has to deal with multiple hardware platforms, and the inherent bugs^h^h^h^hfeatures of each. I'm working on my own little custom GUI for a car-based MP3 player (using an old color laptop display) with svgalib, and the stuff I'm writing is ending up pretty small. With something like an Itsy, things could be done even smaller, as the hardware is known in-and-out by the software developers.
To die, to code, perchance to sleep; aye, there's the rub. For in this code of grep what sleep may come?
The Yopy *is* basically an Itsy, modulo the accellerometer interface, and heck, we can hack one into it.
Don't piss off The Angry Economist
Hold on, did you say this was from a research lab trying to innovate the user interface? The interface is cute, but not really usable.
Lets bring back good old Donald A. Norman ("Design of Everyday Things"). He esentially says people shouldn't have to remember a lot of 'unusual'/not everyday information when using things; the information should be there at hand.
Lets have a look at Itsy: no visible information aside from the name, only a possibility to it through a bunch of undefined moves - which probably vary contextually. Poor user has to learn a whole new interface (not any more natural than what s/he's leaving behind)
Poor user; at least keyboards have letters printed on them.
Then again, the voice interface seems interesting.
-
Download the .avi's and play them with xanim. Works great, unlike the vast majority of movies I download.
-russ
Don't piss off The Angry Economist
Also take a look at Tiqit, founded to market minature computers by the Stanford professor whose matchbox web server was slashdotted sometime back.
Yeah! We need a Bluetooth module so a group of nerds can set up a wireless Cluster just walking down the street.
by Mike Buddha -- Someday the mountain might get him, but the law never will.