Pushing Microwaves Faster Than Light
ContinuousPark writes: "According to this NY Times piece, Lijun Wang of the NEC Research Institute in Princeton has reported an experiment where "a pulse of light that enters a transparent chamber filled with specially prepared cesium gas is pushed to speeds of 300 times the normal speed of light". A second experiment by three scientists for the Italian National Research Council is reporting also superluminal speeds. And yet, this seems to be consistent with Einstein's theories. "
As usual, you replace the "www" with "partners" to get the no login required version of the article, found h ere.
Can be found here at Nature.
Whilst the difficulty in this experiment is in interpreting the results, one thing to remember is that the speed limit c for any information is a postulate of relativity, not something that has been proved. It appears to be true so far, but there is nothing to say that it always applies.
Can someone with a degree in physics answer these questions:
"...under these peculiar circumstances, the main part of the pulse exits the far side of the chamber even before it enters at the near side."
At first I was going to flame NYT for such a stupid claim, but upon reading the rest of the article that appears to be what the scientists themselves are claiming. So my first question is: What is speed if not distance travelled divided by time elapsed? If the time elapsed is negative, how is the speed "300 times c"?
The second question is about the obvious "time travel" aspects. They say several times "you can't send info faster than c", but they don't indicate a reason. The closest they come to justifying this statement is (paraphrase) "there is a leading edge to the main pulse that arrives sooner".
So which is it? Did the pulse exit before it entered OR was there a "leading edge". You can't have it both ways. Either the signal travelled faster than light (in which case signaling superluminally is possible, by definite) OR it did NOT.
--
Have Exchange users? Want to run Linux? Can't afford OpenMail?
Linux MAPI Server!
http://www.openone.com/software/MailOne/
(Exchange Migration HOWTO coming soon)
Short answer: evanescent waves can't carry information because thery convey no power.
Long answer (I'll try to keep it simple): when a beam of EMW (electro-magnetic waves) hits the interface between two materials, it gets partially reflected (and thus returns to the side where it came from), and partially refracted (that is, "goes forward"). Think of the effect you have when you look at a stick through the water's surface. How much of the incoming power is reflected and how much is refracted depends on the two materials involved.
We're mainly interested in the refraction part at this point, and particularly at the angle the EMW beam has with the interface surface. Under certain conditions, the propagation angle of the refracted ("forward") beam with the perpendicular to the interface's surface is bigger than the one of the incoming beam. If we increase the incoming beam's angle, so does the "forward" beam's, until it is completely parallel to the interface. At this angle ("critical angle") the physics of the whole setup change abruptly, and all the incoming power gets reflected. But some kind of EMF is still present in the "forward" part of the interface, generating some field patterns named "evanescent waves".
Those waves don't carry power "forward" (because it's all being reflected), but _can_ carry power along the interface.
This effect has also been studied for long-distance communications using the earth-to-air interface as a carrier.
The item is actually old news. For those of you who missed it originally, I will re-post here the text oif a previous, and more exciting. development:
Overclocker Creates Rift in Space-Time Continuum
Wish I had a whiteboard. Let's try doing this with ASCII art.
Just before the pulse hits the chamber, things look like this:
Pulse Cesium chamber
Note that the pulse has a 'leading edge' -- a rise time before its maximum intensity. Once that leading edge hits the cesium, the cesium recreates the entire pulse on the other side:
So the pulse appears to have gone faster than light through the cesium. Another way to look at it is that the cesium, using nothing more than the leading edge of the pulse, spontaneously created a new pulse. Actually, it created two new pulses, as you can see after a little more time:
|~/#####\->~~~~~~~<-/#####\~| /#####\->
The two pulses within the chamber are moving towards each other, and they'll deconstructively interfere, cancelling each other out. (Actually, they cancel out as soon as the original pulse is completely in the chamber, but it's easier to draw this way.) Meanwhile the pulse outside the chamber is moving away from it and towards your measuring equipment.
So the pulse is not travelling backwards in time. The pulse isn't travelling far at all; it's being annihilated, really, but a copy of it is generated . It just happens to be generated some distance away.
Note that my drawings are flawed; the light pulse was probably longer than the cesium chamber. So the original pulse was already half-destroyed by the time the new pulse emerged from the other end. That would have been difficult to draw.
Why can't we use this to send information faster than light? Read the article again -- they're not really sure that you can't. One person is arguing that the information is packed into the leading edge of the pulse (sort of an optical gzip) and so you're compressing information but not sending it superluminally. Other people (Dr. Nimtz, third paragraph from the bottom) say that they really are sending information faster than light.
Personal opinion: This looks like some kind of wave phase propagation trick to me. We've always known that you can cause a phase shift in a beam of light to propagate superluminally, but the problem is that you can't encapsulate information in phase shifts adequately, due to (IIRC) the uncertainty principle. Not to say that this isn't an exciting experiment, but it doesn't appear to have a practical use. Now, the microwave experiment that travelled at 1.05 c excites me...I'd like to see if they can extend it to interstellar distances and through vacuum. :)
Genocide Man -- Life is funny. Death is funnier. Mass murder can be hilarious.
If a processor worked faster than light it could generate output before the input was entered
This would be very embarasing when it spits out the answer let's say 42 and you forget what question you wanted to ask.
134340: I am not a number. I am a free planet!
OK, here's the reason why things can't go faster than the speed of light.
Relativity (Special Relativity at least) is based on 2 postulates:
For example: you're on a train, and your friend is next to the track as the train goes past. This is quite a fast train - it's going at half the speed of light. You shine a torch ahead of the train: The light coming out of the torch is going at the speed of light (from your point of view - your 'frame of reference') Your friend standing by the side of the track also sees the light coming out of the torch. From her point of view, it's also going at the speed of light. It looks like we have a problem here: She sees the train moving at half the speed of light, and the light moving at the speed of light - the light is going at half the speed of light relative to the train. You on the train however see the light moving away from you at the speed of light.
Paradox? No. Einstein showed that it is actually our concept of space and time that is wrong. From your perspective on the train, everything else (including your friend) is actually squashed up in the direction of the motion of the train - parallel to the tracks. So the light has gone 'further'. Your friend sees the train squashed up (parallel to the tracks) and that time has slowed down on the train.
All this is effectively saying is that where the light is at a particular motion is not disputed by either you or your friend, so there is paradox.
So that's relativity. All you need is a speed which is the same in all reference frames. It doesn't have to be anything to do with light at all. There isn't anything which forbids 'faster than light' travel.
There is a consequence though: If something is travelling faster than light in one frame of reference, there will we another frame of reference where it appears to be travelling backwards - it comes out of the end of the chamber before it's entered the other side.
This causes problems with causality. Things happen before they are caused to happen.
BB.
PS. I'm studying physics at Oxford, England.
-BB