Slashdot Mirror


Multi-Head Gaming

Anonymous Coward writes "A new hosted site at PlanetQuake called Multi-Head Gaming has got pictures of Unreal Tournament running on 5(!) monitors and Quake and Quake III Arena running on 2. It has also got a small howto with details how to set it up yourself on Linux and Windows 2000."

5 of 180 comments (clear)

  1. On Our Way... by tarsi210 · · Score: 4

    From the: Why-the-hell-can't-I-find-my-toes? dept.

    I suppose that this multi-head phenomenon is a step in the direction of a VR type of setup, monitors all around and the person in the center. Which sounds cool......really cool.

    The question is, do the architectures that we currently have do multi-head readily? Or will we start having such things as video servers? I can see a future where you have one computer whose sole job is to house 25 video cards and keep them powered. Its mobo would have the chips on it to communicate to the main gaming server via a gigabyte fiber connection, which it would take the signal and demultiplex it so it would run on all video cards, thus giving you awesome multi-head capabilities.

    Why hasn't anyone come up with this stuff?

  2. It also works in Windows Me and 98 by katmaikni · · Score: 4
    Not like too many people in slashdot uses Windows Me and 98 but I want to note that they support multihead/multi-videocards. I tried it in 2D but I'm not too sure about using it in 3D.

    And now can put two of everything in my gaming computer- 2 OS's, 2 Hard Drive (RAID 0), 2 CD-Roms, 2 floppy drives, 2 GeForce 2 GTS's, 2 Athlons, 2 SCSI cards (one's for raid), 2 power supplys... This my really hurt my two platnum cards. I'll need two jobs. :)

  3. psh - play Quake Bingo. by boinger · · Score: 5
    The REAL hardcore players play Quake like they play bingo - with anywhere from 8 to 20 simultaneous keyboards and mice, as well as separate monitors. THAT is hardcore!


    ("B-16" "You sank my battleship!" "I-24" "You sank my battleship" "O-71" "You sank....")

    --
    Send your friends messages of love at fuck-you.org
  4. 1600x200? by SuperKendall · · Score: 5

    This doesn't look too great at the moment - the resolution UT was running at over the five monitors was 1600x200. Not 1200, 200. Each monitor is set to 320x200. And 20fps overall (it was only a AMD 500 though).

    So, it's going to be plenty pixelated, though perhaps it would be nice with a wider FOV setting. Sniping would be hell, though.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  5. Lot of good it does me. by kwsNI · · Score: 5
    I only have one head.

    -Sorry.

    kwsNI