E-Mail Patent Roundup From The NYT
griffjon writes: "This NYT article details a new patent on getting spam to offline e-mail readers with popup ads and banners more annoying than your average spam. Fantastic. Also contains a funny patent about e-mailing stolen computers to retrieve them." I love the system that would let a predetermined e-mail subject line "initiate a predetermined security response, either locking the display screen so nothing would appear, showing only the name and contact information of the owner or erasing the laptop's hard drive." That one sounds foolproof, eh? (freeregistrationrequiredofcourse.)
I'd love to know how they'd expect us to find a stolen machine in order to issue the "kill" email to it.
It's going to be on the net with a completely different ISP (if at all), and the new owner is not likely to access your email account even if the password is available; most ISPs I know of block POP3/IMAP connections that aren't coming from their own subnets.
Unknown IP address, no email connection, no points of contact... so how's this kill email supposed to be anything but a timebomb waiting to go off on the legitimate owner?
I'm just glad I don't have such an embarassing patent under my name. =)
---
Where can the word be found, where can the word resound? Not here, there is not enough silence.
"Where shall the word be found, where will the word resound? Not here, there is not enough silence." -T.S. Eliot
I understand that many people consider that spam as well, but that kind of spam is at least controlled more easily.
Here's the abstract of the patent:
By the way, I wonder why they included via a modem in there. It seems like an unnecessary limitation.
If it had a Built In Webcam (tm) you could tak3 pictures and send 7hem to y0u.
or what ab0ut a fing3rprin7 l0ck? so identific4ti0n c0uld be sent to the p0lic3 when the attempt to 0pen 1t h4pp3n5.
What if it had lazerz and 5m0ke b0mbs!! wouldn7 that be c0ol? I c4n get s0me p4r7z 4nd h4x0r 0n3 70g37h3r 0u7 0f 5p4r3 m07h3rb04rdz 4nd 9unp0wd3r!!!!!!! 7H47 WUD B3 1337!!!!
wow... I should go...
YouTube & Google Video -> podcast http://castcluster.blogspot.com/
I'm no lawyer but the difference is that people(Americans anyway) have the right to free speech as protected by the First Amendment because it is vital part of individual freedom to allow them to speak their mind about any topic they wish. Businesses are a created entity allowed under law and have no inherent rights - only what the government grants them. The question is then, does government grant the same freedom of speech to businesses that it does to individuals and furthermore, why should/shouldn't it? Someone will probably argue that it is a person working for the business which is actually speaking BUT the key is they are speaking for the business, not for themself.
Don't leave your mind so open that your brain falls out. Don't close it so much that you cut off the blood.
I can see how that relates to Spam... wasn't it Jackson who said "Give me Liberty or Give Me All Teen XXX Babes Live!!!!!"?
2 1337 4 u!
I hope many, many means of spamming are discovered and patented! Then there will be:
I say, let the spammers make it as hard as they can for each other. No skin off our nose, and it may actually reduce the amount of spam out there.
Steve
The ability to send an email to a computer, have it erase its hard drive, send out additional emails so you know it was successful, and then stop the machine from working.
:-)
:-)
Oh, wait! We already have that
Its called M$ Outlook.
I understand Pitr is working on a linux port this week
the AC
Hemos is like...sci-fi fans;he thinks technology is cool, but he hasn't bothered to understand the science it's based on