Slashdot Mirror


Mac OS X Beta To Come Out Sept. 13

A reader writes "At his keynote at Seybold today, Steve Jobs announced that Mac OS X beta will ship on September 13th. More details at MacNN's site." This is the beta - but the Sept. 13th beta launch is the first day of Paris Mac Expo, meaning that it probably will happen. He also confirmed that they are on target for an "early 2001" release of OSX.

5 of 227 comments (clear)

  1. OSX an "early 2001" release by Hairy_Potter · · Score: 5

    in other news, leaked photos of the new OSX server reveal it to be large, black monolith.

  2. Interesting other note from the Jobs demo by maggard · · Score: 4
    From the linked story
    Other features highlighted include a new Aqua Pro Mode option, which changes all the Aqua elements to Graphite, to help reduce the graphic distraction that some graphic artists expressed displeasure over in Aqua.
    This is new as Apple has to date refused to support alternate interfaces under prior Mac OS's. There was an Apple project for supported themes that even got shipped with a few demos included but Jobs scrapped it as soon as he returned to power. To date the official word on Aqua was that it's "lickable" interface would be the only option and there was fear Apple would do something to actively block alternatives (Aqua themes appear to be trivially edited text and graphics files.)

    What's even more interesting is that the alternate theme is not Apple's previous "Platinum" theme but a new one. As Platinum is already supported under Aqua in "Classic" applications this means that there will now be three different UI's shipping - Platinum under Classic, the default "lickable" under Aqua and it's alternate "Graphite".

    --
    I don't read ACs: If a post isn't worth so much as a nom de plume to its author then I wont bother either.
    1. Re:Interesting other note from the Jobs demo by gwernol · · Score: 5

      What's even more interesting is that the alternate theme is not Apple's previous "Platinum" theme but a new one. As Platinum is already supported under Aqua in "Classic" applications this means that there will now be three different UI's shipping - Platinum under Classic, the default "lickable" under Aqua and it's alternate "Graphite".

      I think you're reading more into this than is really there. Choosing the graphite look just changes the Aqua widgets to monochrome. For example, the three standard window title bar widgets (close window, minimize window and zoom window) are now all the same graphite gray color, rather then being red, yellow and green.

      This is simply Aqua with a more muted color scheme. It is not a separate UI at all.

      --
      Sailing over the event horizon
  3. Keynote transcript available here: by WillAdams · · Score: 4

    http://www.key3media.com/seyboldseminars/sf2000/pr esentations/keynotes/apple/jobs.html

    Should help clear up some of the confusion about, e.g. ``Pro Mode''/Graphite Aqua.

    William

    PS - mentioned this before, but www.macthemes.org says in their Developer notes that themes for Mac OS X are quite feasible.

    --
    Lettering Art in Modern Use
    http://members.aol.com/willadams

    --
    Sphinx of black quartz, judge my vow.
  4. Re:OSX: perfect "linux" distro? by nconway · · Score: 4
    RedHat/GNOME/KDE & crew have a loooong way to go before they match the user experience of OS X

    Steve Jobs and crew have a 'loooong way to go' before they even release MacOSX. When it's released, then it will be fair to compaire with a GNU/Linux distro. Considering the pace at which Linux is improving, it's very difficult to predict the future.

    All the distro makers are trying very hard to make a luser friendly yet powerful unix system, but that exactly describes OS X. Except for the hardware constraints, anybody interested in linux from a user standpoint is better served using MacOS X. Why give Grandma Redhat when you can give her OSX?

    I think MacOSX will be cool as hell, but it's nowhere near a 'better Linux than Linux' (not necessarily worse or better, just different). OSX will only run on Apple hardware. That means tossing out all that cheap, plentiful x86 hardware and starting over. It also means that old SparcStation in the corner isn't going to be running MacOS X any time soon. OSX is closed source (Darwin not withstanding - I'd say the majority of MacOSX will be closed source), and only runs on a closed hardware platform. If you use GNU/Linux for philosophical reasons, you won't want to have much to do with OSX. Once MacOS X is finally released, it will be brand new, 'fresh' code (stuff taken from BSD notwithstanding). Which is great from an 'innovation' standpoint; but I know I'll definately be hesitant to run MacOS X on any important servers anytime soon.

    Then again, I don't really know much about OSX, so go ahead and correct me. One quick question - is the GUI integrated into the OS? If you're running X on it, will you need to load Apple's GUI (for lack of a better term), as well as X? Can you forego a GUI entirely? Throw in all the standard OSS tools

    Have they actually been ported to OSX? How stable are they? OS X makes me seriously consider picking up a mac

    Me too!