Slashdot Mirror


The Ultimate Bike

Lenbok writes: "The guys at Dallas Semiconductors have been busy. They've wired a bicycle (pix here) with a local microLAN of web-addressable sensors including temperature sensors, addressable switches, A/D converters, iButtons, and chips to manage battery functions. Quiet electric power, exercised on demand, a full instrument panel (via palmpilot), data login, a Web page for your eBike, and even e-mail while traveling. What more could you ask for? GPS integration? That's on its way." [timothy butts in ...] And don't forget that this is only if you want a semi-normal lookin' electric bike. Don't forget that Steve Roberts has been crankin' the pedals of a series of very wired bikes (and now boats) for a long time. Check out his Nomadic Research Labs for some of the coolest because-we-can technology (home-brewed, and re-purposed COTS stuff) you're likely to find on this planet.

27 of 87 comments (clear)

  1. Expensive gadget ? by mirko · · Score: 2

    Hi,
    First of all, as many people I know here in Switzerland, whenever we are on a bike, we just renew our oxygen while riding the fastest possible, it is a sport, not only a transportation mean. This device seems to be too distractive for a hurry or sportive guy that usually take his bike to change his mind an healthy way.
    More than in a car, where handy usage is strongly discouraged, a small loss of attention while riding a bike may have huge consequences : loss of equilibrium, accident, etc. So, I just suggest we avoid such tech/sport mix in this case.
    2nd, as mountain bikes popularity as increased even more during the last decade, I just can't imagine that this bike could be solid enough to resists a tiny sidewalk jump.
    BTW, they seemed to be too modest to just indicates its weight... I bet people riding more than one mile a day won't want this probably heavy thing.
    --

    --
    Trolling using another account since 2005.
    1. Re:Expensive gadget ? by Eg0r · · Score: 2
      Hiya Mirko,

      I live in Liverpool, but I guess it's about the same in most towns in the UK:
      You'd have to be CRAZY to ride a bike around here!!!! Ask yourself:

      • bike lanes? what bike lanes??? kids get run over 'coz there aren't even red lights so that they can cross some dangerous roads safely... (kids and drunk students ;)
      • Are you sure it is your job to filter the pollution with your very own set of lungs?
      • Do you think you can win against a doubledecker in case of frontal collision (still not used those cars driving the WRONG $^$%^%& side of the road ;)
      • Are you rich enough to pay fines for riding on the pavements... or to pay for a new one, when your bike gets stollen?
      mmhh... thought not. The only alternative I found to be half viable is to rollerblade to the uni. I found these nifty skates with a blade that comes of the shoe, it's pretty cool to go inside shops and stuff. Still doesn't solve the problem of car pollution, but at least you can still ride on the pavement (towns like manchester forbid it :(((( )

      Oh well, I guess at some point I'll have to learn how to drive a car and start contributing to air pollution myself...

      ---

      --
      "Hasta la victoria siempre!" El Comandante
  2. Re:This scares me. by jilles · · Score: 2

    Yes, now you can actually physically transport a running program from A to B. Mobile agents are the future!

    But seriously, what else should you run to achieve the same functionality at the same development cost?

    --

    Jilles
  3. Re:Here's a proper bike by JanneM · · Score: 2

    On this note, I've been thinking about what technology such as this could be used for on motorcycles. Sure, there's the obvious stuff, like GPS+GIS for navigation, but what else?

    One idea I've had is to have a database of photographs of streets and streetcorners that can pop up on a HUD screen in the helmet, making it easy to compare the real scene with what you should be seeing if you're in the right place -- much more helpful than a small dot on a GPS map for navigating.

    I'm not all that happy with the idea of mail on the bike, though -- biking on a busy street with buses and trucks is 'interesting' enough without trying to compose a message at the same time. The sent mail would be quite intresting to read, though: "...and thus I think thatNo! NO! Don't swerve this way! AAAaaaaargh..."

    One gadget that would be useful would be a tire temperature/pressure sensor that could warn as soon at the pressure is too high or too low for current conditions. Another one would be moisture sensors in the pack bags (don't laugh -- it's _REALLY_ depressing to stop for the night and realize that your entire wardrobe's been rainsoaked 'cause you didn't seal the bags properly).

    Any more ideas, anybody?

    --
    Trust the Computer. The Computer is your friend.
  4. Re:GPS .. by ratbag · · Score: 2

    I've been using my Psion + Garmin GPS for a while and it works okay. The problem in London and any other big city is the height of the buildings. It can be tricky to get a good lock on multiple satellites when 70-80% of the sky is filled by concrete.

    On the open road it's a breeze. I tend to stop if I'm not sure of the best route, check out what the GPS+RoutePlanner/StreetPlanner suggest, then plough on. Looking down at a screen whilst driving is a big no-no. I've played with a program (CoDriver) that shouts out directions as you go. With a bit of work that would probably be the best way to go.

    re: HUDS. I drive an Impreza Turbo. In Japan, STI will sell you a nice HUD for their top-spec models. I've not seen one on a UK car yet, so I can't report on their efficacy.

    Rob.

  5. Re:cool, but what about... by Accipiter · · Score: 2
    First thing that came to my mind was

    "What the hell happens if you stop REAL short, and crash?"

    Judging by the pics, the following sequence would be likely:

    1.) Bike hits large pothole, front wheel descends and stops.
    2.) Rider is thrown over the handlebars, pulling the Palm Pilot forward, breaking the dock and yanking it off the bar. (If the rider somehow clears the Palm Pilot, the handlebars hitting the ground will tear it off anyway.)
    3.) The weight of the rear will cause it to swing forward to the right or left, falling on the rider and probably injuring him, as well as the motor, and LAN components.
    4.) Bike comes to a rest on the rider, with pieces of plastic strewn around the wreck site. A very hurt, and very pissed off rider stumbles to his feet, surveys the damage, and wonders why the hell he put computer equipment on a Bicycle.
    5.) Rider cries.

    -- Give him Head? Be a Beacon?

    --

    -- Give him Head? Be a Beacon?
    (If you can't figure out how to E-Mail me, Don't. :P)

  6. as a cyclist... by ragnar · · Score: 2
    ... and as a geek, I must say that this isn't appealing at all. I ride my bicycle in order to get away from the sensory overload of the work week and my computer hobbies.

    One of the greatest things about cycling is that its simplicity. In fact, one of the things I've noticed in the sport is a resurgence of the track bike, which has only one gear and no brakes (you reverse your pedal direction to slow down). Those who ride these bikes (I'm not one of them yet) swear by its purity and ability to free your mind of the modern stresses.

    If you are any brand of computer geek and you are thinking of getting a bike, do it. However, don't look for a bike like this. Get outside. Ride hard. Get away from the computer.

    --
    -- Solaris Central - http://w
  7. Re:windshield washer martini by PD · · Score: 2

    I know a guy who did something simpler, but cooler. He routed the windshield washer hose to his front right fender. When he turned it on, fluid would spray out several feet from the right side of the car. He used to hose down pedestrians with it.

  8. Great, just great... by walnut · · Score: 2

    I've spent the week in the city, battling through hordes of Bostonians chatting away on their cell phones while they drive - whipping in and out of the lanes of traffic completely oblivious to what is around them because they are glued to their phone.

    Now, thanks to these guys, when I finally get away to New Hampshire or Vermont for a weekend of mountain biking, I can look forward to some idiot, not paying attention to the trail and once again making things relatively unsafe for everybody because he's checking his schedule or some other rediculous crap. Whoo hoo, way to make biking pleasureable.

    There are days when all I really need is an EMP gun.

    --
    You say you want a revolution?
  9. Thoughts from a less obsessed cyclist by alienmole · · Score: 2
    Basically, it slows you down and that seems contradictory to the purpose.

    "The purpose"? Sorry, dude, but the purpose is to get outside, enjoy some sunshine (or rain) and fresh air, beautiful scenery, get some exercise, and have fun. You're taking it way too seriously.

  10. FNHAABCOTP by dash2 · · Score: 4

    First "now how about a Beowulf cluster of those" Post!

  11. Re:Crash test by Minupla · · Score: 2

    *laughs* make sure you buy the extended warrenty plan at whatever random discount electronics store you buy the Palm at :)
    ----
    Remove the rocks from my head to send email

    --
    On the whole, I find that I prefer Slashdot posts to twitter ones because I don't get limited to 140 chars before
  12. Thoughts from a cyclist by Mr+T · · Score: 4
    As a competitive racer (read: bike geek, and there are hardcore geeks in the bike world) and a full-on computer geek I have mixed emotions on this stuff. You would not believe the kinds of money I and people like me have spent trying to make our bikes stronger, stiffer, and above all else lighter. A good racing bike doesn't have comforts, in fact they are usually aluminum or carbon and they are insanely stiff and you feel every little pebble in the road, minimum padding in the seat, cork on the bars is probably the biggest luxury on the ride.. Even mountain biking is moving away from soft long-travel full suspension style "luxury" bikes, only down hill experts ride those anymore, soft tails (very cool, pivotless rear suspension usually made out of space age carbon or Ti.. no pivot means no extra metal for the joints which means less weight) are where it's at because they are stiffer which means that less energy goes in to bounce and more energy goes in to make you go forward faster, there is just enough rear suspension to take the edge off. That's not to say it's not fun or enjoying to ride such a bike, the idea is to go fast and that's what they are designed to do, I probably wouldn't tour 500 miles on one though.

    Then these guys come along, I read about Winnebiko in Dr. Dobbs a while back.. And they are bucking the nature of it all for me. Putting computers and crap on there is sweet. Shit, putting computers on just about everything is sweet, but this just doesn't seem right some how. Maybe I don't get the whole "touring" thing. All the computers and stuff make it more heavy which means you can't climb as fast and they make it less aerodynamic which means you're not going to hawl as much ass on the downhill side. Basically, it slows you down and that seems contradictory to the purpose.

    --
    This is my signature. There are many signatures like it but this one is mine..
  13. Oh man.. by Thomas+Charron · · Score: 2

    This guys gonna get his rear kicked one of these days. I mean, I like the idea, but the very *LOOK* of the beast with the Palm sticking out just screams "Please, KICK MY A**!!". ;-P Of course, as you peddle as fast as you can to get away, you hit a rock, fly through the air, and begin to cry as all of the wonderfull toys come smashing to a pile of smashed plastic and broken circuit boards. And just then, the guys who say you earlier catch up.. ;-P

    --
    -- I'm the root of all that's evil, but you can call me cookie..
  14. GPS .. by JamesS · · Score: 2

    Does this mean that soon they'll make cars with GPS and Sat Nav that actually works properly? Hell, maybe it'll help us get around London...

    --
    -- James
    1. Re:GPS .. by GregWebb · · Score: 2

      I remember a while back someone came up with a navigation system which, rather than using GPS sattelites, tuned into AM radio and gained its position by triangulation of the data combined with a database of transmitter locations. Needed a heck of a lot of signals - 10ish IIRC - to get an accurate enough position, but it did work. And for quite a bit less cost, too. Never did hear more about it, which is a pity. Struck me as a nice hack and would probably work better in that sort of environment.

      Anyway, back onto the original. One thing some designers seem to forget, though, is that it isn't practical to assume a constant GPS signal. I heard a rather funny story a little while back where a system was being tested by one of the UK car mags (Autocar) but wasn't telling them to come off a roundabout. See, the exit was under a flyover and it couldn't get the signal as it hit the junction, which it required. Oops...

      Someone soon wrote in and pointed out that the system on their Rover 75 could successfully navigate through a tunnel. Apparently, it was using the speedo and power steering to provide secondary location information. Not so accurate, but it worked well enough to clear the obstruction and could probably help with this sort of problem.

      --

      Greg

      (Inside a nuclear plant)
      Aaaarrrggh! Run! The canary has mutated!

    2. Re:GPS .. by GrenDel+Fuego · · Score: 2

      That would be Nightvision by Cadillac.

    3. Re:GPS .. by StarFace · · Score: 2
      They have it, in fact they have had it for a long time. I think the simplest HUDs on cars came out around '91 or '92. They used to run an add on television showing a person passing another car and how much scenery changes in the amount of time it takes to look down at your dash meters. The early HUD would print your speed and RPMs.

      They are still working on advancing the tech. I think the latest is the oncomming headlight dimmers and pseudo(?) night-vision. Though that is kinda of stretching the HUD concept.

      I kind of remember a navigation system that projected on the wind sheild, it was probably on a concept car though. The problem is that a meaningful map is usually rather detailed, expecially in a dense area like cities where they are used the most. So they become distracting.

      --
      V
  15. This scares me. by pb · · Score: 2

    Embedded Java? On a bike?

    Oh well, I guess that silly Java-on-a-wristwatch joke isn't as far away as I'd like it to be.
    ---
    pb Reply or e-mail; don't vaguely moderate.

    --
    pb Reply or e-mail; don't vaguely moderate.
  16. Not only bikes... by Schwarzchild · · Score: 2

    but people have also tried to make cars do everything practically. I remember a news story about 15 years ago that covered a guy who had retrofitted his classic car (circa 50') with a bar, kitchen, shower (you basically hung off the side of the car while it was moving I think!), and many other items that I can't remember. No, there was no internet or GPS that car didn't have any of that new fangled stuff...

    --

    "sweet dreams are made of this..."

  17. cool, but what about... by ai731 · · Score: 2
    ... rain? How well to all those components work in a downpour? Or are you only supposed to ride the thing where there's guaranteed blue skies? Silly me - you can only afford one if you're a Silly Valley dotcom millionaire, so of course rain's not a problem. Doh.

    ai731

    --

    --
    "I use the words you taught me. If they don't mean anything any more, teach me others. Or let me be silent"
  18. The problem with eBikes by Nicolas+MONNET · · Score: 2

    ... do you really want to look like this?

  19. Sorry, its not ultimate... by Lion-O · · Score: 2
    On the wall is both a 120-volt power plug for recharging the battery and the RJ45 Ethernet jack that gives the bike an Internet connection..

    Not even a wireless LAN? Hm, is the 150km extension cord also included?

  20. Steve Roberts... by emufreak · · Score: 2

    ...did a talk at an auditorium at Moffett Field, California, for the Computer Museum just yesterday, and I went to go hear it. Very interesting stuff.

    The Computer Museum's home page is at www.computerhistory.org.

  21. Dangers of overclocking by w00ly_mammoth · · Score: 2

    The day is not far when somebody will try to OC. In view of this fact, I think it's important to warn people of various hazards.

    * Overclocking bikes is different from OC'ing PCs. A crash is slightly more likely to be non-recoverable.

    * Immersing bikes in liquid nitrogen tanks while dressed in scuba gear and driving by chicks to impress them with your leading edge status in the OC community is a Bad Idea.

    What other possibilities exist? Add to the list.

    w/m

  22. Oh brother by babbage · · Score: 2
    Does anyone besides me find this ridiculous? Some questions / comments / observations:
    • Why?
    • How heavy is this monster? Lightweight bikes are far more practical, as a rule; is this too bulky to be worth using?
    • Would you want to be on the same {street|sidewalk} as the maniac barreling along on one of these? Cell phones for drivers are bad enough, palm-web-java-whatever on a bike sounds like a series of (admittedly relatively minor, compared to cars) injuries just screaming to happen.
    • I, for one, like riding my bike as a form of release from technology. It's just me and the pedals, and one of the few times I don't really connect to the digital world. I don't want that space to be invaded this way. Maybe others would like it, but I think it would be a particularly hard sell if others feel the same way I do.

    Gizmos in the car is one thing -- you're more likely to have passengers to play with the stuff, or to be stuck in traffic and what have you. But this feels like the wrong platform to me. Why why why?



  23. I wonder if, by bob_jordan · · Score: 2

    the bike can send you automatic email such as

    "You are about to ride under a bus, LOOK UP, LOOK UP!!!!"

    A head-up-display would be MUCH safer.

    Bob.