Slashdot Mirror


Typosquatting

plashdoy writes: "Oh what a tangled Web we weave: ZDNN article on Typosquatting. Don't you hate it when stuff like this is more profitable than your honest efforts?" I have no problem with typo squatting as a whole, but there are a dozen Slashdot typo sites, one of which frames Slashdot with a 2nd banner ad. Now I don't care ... but this fools about 1 person every 2-3 days, and they flame me for selling out and doing something so horrible as framing Slashdot for extra ad space. So I guess typo sites that frame the site are pretty slimey, but as long as the typo site provides a link to the correct site, I'm totally cool with 'em.

3 of 154 comments (clear)

  1. Kills frame-squatting dead. by e_n_d_o · · Score: 5

    setTimeout ("changePage()", 10);
    function changePage()
    {
    if(self.parent.frames.length != 0)
    self.parent.location="/index.html";
    }

    1. Re:Kills frame-squatting dead. by Haight6716 · · Score: 5

      A cleaner version of this:

      <script language="JavaScript"><!--
      // Break out of frames! I'm the tops!
      if (window.location != window.parent.location) {
      window.parent.location = window.location;
      }
      //--></script>

      If you want a nav-bar, that's why your browser has that little toolbar at the top of the screen. Or you can implement a floating bar that sits in it's own trimmed-down browser window. Then you won't run afoul of frame-busting scripts.

      -=Julian=-

  2. Making bucks off someone else's rep by warpeightbot · · Score: 5
    I don't agree, Taco. Someone else is making bucks off your good rep, for $15 worth of capital. At best, somebody owes you a cut of the proceeds for your blood, sweat, and tears spent making a site yonder doofus could exploit.

    I have a feeling that if I went out on the street, put up a green sign with silver arches, and called it MacDonalds and started selling chicken sandwiches, that the company that has sold Billions and Billions would have proper recourse to land on me with a ton of lawyers. But here in cyberspace, it's *just* a typo?

    I don't think so. And even if it is, when folks like the 800 pound gorilla from Redmond get into the act, it won't stay that way long, DOJ lawsuits aside. And for once, I think that's as it should be. www.whitehouse.com indeed, don't try that not-a-link unless you're 18.....

    --
    That Isaac Hayes, he's one baaaad mutha...(Hush yo mouth!)
    I'm just talkin' 'bout Chef! (We can dig it!)