"e-mail" vs "email"
wiredog points us to a Wired article talking about a debate at least as critical as the race for U.S. president: e-mail vs email. Well? Which is it? Personally I'm too lazy to care about the proper use of homonyms, much less type an extra hyphen.
Well.
I gave up reading the article after the first page. Wired really tires me out with it's constant use of buzzwords like "Digirati" and the like.
Yes, maybe I should have finished the article before posting my comment. As far as "Wired Style" goes, maybe I was wrong. I got that book for Christmas a few years back when I was still working as a Journalist with the U.S. Navy.
This is the kind of article on slashdot where very few people are actually going to take the time to read the article. Personal opinions on this matter are more important then what Wired says about it anyway.
However, because this is true, I should have made doubly sure to be factually acurate in my comment. I went by memory (because my copy of 'Wired Style' is 40 miles away and hidden among a stack of hundreds of books in the top of my bedroom closet.
Actually, I have wanted for a while to get a new copy of the "Associated Press Stylebook". I haven't seen a copy since the 1994 edition and I would like to see how it has delt with many of the terms that have become so popular due to the internet over the last few years.
e'mail would not work as a contraction. Contractions follow the style of using the complete first word and than adding an apostrophe and a contracted form of the last word. Therefore electronic'l would be a more correct contracted form.
"E-mail" works. I prefer email and I prefer it as a new word. We are on the virge of a new emerging evolution of the English language. English has always been an evolving language, a language that changes to meet the needs of the people who are speeking it. This is why there are so many differences in proper English, Austrailian English, American English and the various dialects (southern English is definately different from Northern.)
Read a copy of "Beowulf" in the original tongue. Old English is barely recognizable to us today. Then read a few passages from the King James Bible of 1611. The language of the "King's English" is also remote to us (though easy to interpret.) Now read a copy of "Grapes of Wrath" and you will see that even this book, which is less than 100 years old, uses language that at times seems a bit odd. Now read "Snowcrash" and you will be reading something that seems modern to us.
It won't be long before our language accepts the new terminology into it's vernacular as new words and not contractions of two seperate words. E-mail will become email. And little children who see the book "Charlotte's Web" sitting on the shelf will assume first that it is a book about technology.
Yes, I prefer 'email'. it is simpler. Almost elegant. It is forward-looking. E-mail makes you think of a letter sent electronically. But email is word that is open and transcends the old concepts of mail.
Brought to you by Frobozz Magic Penguin Fodder.
What bugs the hell out of me is the all-too-common usage of 'email' as a singular noun. I see all the time people saying 'I'll send him an email' or 'I have 3 emails'.
Yuck yuck yuck yuck yuck. The noun 'email' is plural, and should be used exactly the same way as the plural noun 'mail'. You check your email, you send a piece of email, you send some email if you insist on a shorter way of saying the previous. This used to be standard usage before about 1993 or so (see Sep tem ber that never ended), but sadly seems to be the minority usage now.
---
At least mafia-owned pizzarias make excellent pizza. Compare to Bill Gates.
My friends mom calls it "e"
"I got a ton of "E" today...
You rollin?
http://siokaos.org/
Not e-mail nor email, nowadays it's all SPAM.
-Billco, Fnarg.com
GNU/email
I find this note from Don Knuth enlightning:
A note on email versus e-mail
Btw, "Micro-soft" had a hyphen too..
__________________________________________
God did not appoint us to suffer wrath but to receive salvation through our Lord Jesus Christ --1Thes5:9
Is whether or not there's a hyphen in "anal retentive."
One day I feel I'm ahead of the wheel / the next it's rolling over me / I can get back on / I can get back on
Come on, guys! We haven't had a decent poll in months, and when but when decent poll fodder does come along, you post it as an article.
Post this as a poll. You could probably do the same with some of the lameness that gets foisted on us in Ask Slashdot, too.
--
--
E_NOSIG
The Chicago Manual of Style, 14th Ed., on p. 203, says:
"A closed (or solid) compound is a combination of two or more elements, originally separate words, now spelled as one word. Examples: henhouse, typesetting, makeup, notebook."
Thus 'typesetting' probably began as 'type setting', and then moved to 'type-setting', and finally became 'typesetting.'
The path for 'email' was 'electronic mail', 'electronic-mail', 'e-mail', and finally 'email'.
One rule, when in doubt, is to check an unabridged (recent) dictionary. If a word has progressed to the closed compound stage, it will be in the dictionary without the hyphen, and that would mean it is now valid to use it that way.
________________
________________
Private Essayist
I use Google.
email - 55,000,000 pages.
e-mail - 3,560,000 pages.