Slashdot Mirror


PythonLabs moves to Digital Creations

snottrue writes "This just in from comp.lang.python - the PythonLabs team is moving to Digital Creations (the Zope people)." Van Rossum's message is informative.

6 of 27 comments (clear)

  1. Pythons BDFL doesnt fall for weak jedi mind tricks by jherber · · Score: 3

    """No -- DC is not interested in branding or monetizing Python, so there will be no pressure for marketing gimmicks like that. Python will remain Python, soon to be owned py the Python Software Foundation (more about that idea another time).""" - Guido van Rosssum

    http://x71.deja.com/threadmsg_ct.xp?AN=686840642 .1&mhitnum=10&CONTEXT=972744081.2060845082

    this is a very good move in my opinion. the designers and implementors of the langauge will be couped up with one of their biggest customers and users. only good things can come from all the cross pollination. the zope gurus will no doubt influence python's future in the area of backend server capability.

    digicool's zope team also teamed up with mozilla (http://www.zope.org/Products/ZopeStudio) to develop a new managment front end that runs using mozilla's new widgets. this experience may come in handy as the python team decides the fate of the default GUI that ships with the core python release, given that the future of tcl is shady (http://www.ajubasolutions.com/company/whatsnew.ht ml) from a support standpoint, as well as that many are unhappy with inelegant solution of going through another tcl to get to tk.

    Kudos to GvR for putting the protection of the python and the python community first.

    jherber

  2. Python needs a CPAN by costas · · Score: 4

    When I first heard of Python, I thought it was a joke; I mean, whitespace-sensitive? what is this Fortran? However, it just so happened that my company was looking for a RAD language we could use on Unix and NT. So, I started using Python as a punchline as in "Be careful, or I am gonna write this in Python". After using that joke too many times, I actually started looking into the language. Python kicks ass. It's a RAD Java, a clean Perl, a consistent PHP. So, I am now this Python evangelist.

    However, Python is severely lacking in the modules dept: Don't get me wrong the distro libraries are great, but occasionally you need a quick hack that you *know* someone else has already written. We need a CPAN for Python. Starship and the Vaults of Parnassus are OK, but they're nothing more than an index, without organization or consistency.

    I hope Digital Creations actually tries something like that...

  3. Digital Creations helped solve the license problem by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 3
    BeOpen were not the only people working on resolving the licensing problem. In all I think I put in a few days on the Python licensing issue, speaking with the CNRI person via email, phone, and an in-person meeting. I did it at the request of Digital Creations. DC's investor had changed the Zope license OSD at my request, so he was calling in the favor by asking me to work on another license that concerned them.

    Thanks

    Bruce

  4. Finally some good news! by Enigma2175 · · Score: 3

    It is a very good thing that Python development is moving to another company. BeOpen wanted to take total control of the language and release it under a different license. Hopefully Digital Creations will be more open-minded on this matter (the article indicates they will be). Python is a valuable resource to the community and I would hate to see it drop by the wayside because of money-minded corporations.


    Enigma

    --

    Enigma

  5. Good by Fizgig · · Score: 3

    I was never quite sure what BeOpen actually planned on doing with Python. At least Digital Creations' entire livlihood depends on Python continuing to exist, and they're already a successful open source company. I thought those of us who love Python had it bad with all the moving around and the uncertainty behind licensing and the language's future (I imagine Guido et al have been having a rougher time at it than I have!), but I just saw on the front page of Linux Weekly News the current TCL plight. So I guess we could have it worse.

  6. BeOpen was not the license problem by Adam+J.+Richter · · Score: 3

    The obstruction was not at BeOpen, it was at CNRI.

    A particular person who remained at CNRI after the Python guys went to BeOpen claimed that all the work done during the CNRI days was not implicitly under the original CWI terms, but rather was copyright CNRI and CNRI had yet to give anyone permission to do anything. That party wrote new copying conditions and, after a great deal of work by BeOpen, backed down to something that is probably GPL compatible, but muddied. (The new CNRI copying conditions include the additional restriction beyond the GPL's that "This License Agreement shall be governed by and interpreted in all respects by thelaw of the State of Virginia, excluding conflict of law provisions." I think the issue is basically over which part of the total list of copying permissions is referred to by "This License Agreement", but I'm not a lawyer.)

    Whether or not it was their plan, BeOpen made a huge sacrafice in human resources to focus on defusing the Python license bomb. We could very easily have reverted to situation where all the work done during the CNRI years was under a cloud of legal threats. BeOpen deserves our deep gratitude for this.

    Also, CNRI could have been worse about this, so I would appreciate our not trashing them either.