Canadians vs. "Hateful" Website
We received the following: "Brad Fitzpatrick runs the freevote website with the help of a a few friends. It's simply a website where you can create a voting booth and take a poll about any subject you're interested in. Recently, some Canadian news sources have been creating quite a stir about his site, talking about how it violates hate crime legislation. Why? Because irresponsible people, specifically a group of canadian high schoolers in this case, have been logging onto his site and supposedly have been creating 'hateful' voting questions." Interesting definition of "hateful".
This makes me sick.
I don't like hateful material any more than anyone else, but seeing stuff like this makes me ashamed to be a Canadian.
Isn't it understood that when you limit freedom of speech only to that which you find acceptable, the speech is no longer free? This isn't such a tough concept.
Canadians' speech is free so long as they don't do anything that feels offensive to government officials. Hmmm...
Well, under those rules, Red China has free speech, too! Just make sure you only say nice things about the communist party.
I'd rather turn away from things that disgust me (like the KKK's recent success in joining Missouri's Adopt-a-Road program), rather than worrying about the steady erosion of my rights. Part of the cost of freedom is seeing and hearing things that may offend you.
And they want to go after the American who owns the website - for comments he didn't even post!
Once again, my country provides an international forum to embarrass me.
Jeez, as if being raped by Revenue Canada wasn't bad enough.
Anyone wanna hire a good, hard-working computer geek who yearns for the responsibility and pride of being an American citizen? Check out my user bio for more info.
Fire and Meat. Yummy.
I've already started to see some comments to the effect of, "That's great that they run a site, but they should monitor the content somehow..."
We _do_ monitor the content.
There are many mechanisms running behind the scenes that screen the content based on sets of "bag" regexes and then flag booths. At any time, booths can be in the "Probably okay", "Probably bad", "Verified Good", or "Verified Bad" state, along with a date that the booth was set to that state last. There are then jobs working all the time scanning booths more and adjusting the states of booths that have changed since their last update.
FreeVote volunteers and employees then manually verify booths that are in the "probably bad" state and place them in either "Verified Bad" or "Verified Good".
In addition, visitors to the booths can rank the quality/content of the booth, and that raises more flags we look at.
There is a ton of moderation being done on the site, both automatic and by hand. More code has been written for our admin area than any other part of the site.
The real problem is the combination of:
a) people's immaturity
b) people's intolerance
I'm not sure either one is solvable.
My issue with Canada is that they're extremely intolerant. A bad booth will go up and immediately they start threatening lawsuits and calling my advertisers complaining, even if we shut it down within a day or so of its creation.
I don't start websites to make money --- I do them all for fun. I really hate having to deal with this crap because IANAL, I don't want to be a learn, don't want to pretend to be a lawyer, and just hate dealing with this stuff.
So depressing.
Maybe they should just leave it alone. It doesn't happen to be in Canada, so I can't see how it is any of their business.
The fact that their kiddies had to leave the country to do this doesn't speak well of their free speech efforts.
If I leave the US and go to a country where laws are different, and I do something that is illegal here in the US but isn't there, I have broken no laws in the US and am not treated as a lawbreaker here (most of the time. I grant there are exceptions, dammit...). Maybe Canada is different?
*whup* "Get along, little electrons. Heeyah!"