Slashdot Mirror


Subtle Change in Patent Case Law

An Anonymous Coward sends us this: "A friend sent me this link on Yahoo to a somewhat obscure court ruling which may have important consequences for patents, reverse engineering, and the like. I'm not a lawyer so I can't really assess the full impact of this ruling, but my friend (who is a law student) claims that it is a fairly big deal in the intellectual property realm." The article does a good job of explaining.

1 of 3 comments (clear)

  1. Sounds like a good decision... by StevenMaurer · · Score: 3

    Of course nobody is going to read this, since typical slashdot kiddies just look at the most recent articles, but anyway...

    This is a good decision. It gives a little teeth back into the examination process, which relatively recently has been eroded to the point of a joke. Now, at least, if you submit a patent that the examiner initially rejects because it is overly broad, that initial decision will stick - even if you subsequently narrow the scope to get the application approved.

    Even though I have about a dozen patent and patents pending, I can't help but believe this is a good thing, and will promote innovation. I only hope the Supreme Court doesn't choose to overturn this one.