rho writes "Stephan Somogyi at MacWEEK trumpets everybody's favorite security-concious *nix OpenBSD with an article telling why he likes it. Pretty plain jane, but introduces OpenBSD to a new audience (i.e. Mac users)."
How can "OpenBSD rules" possibly be off-topic? It's entirely on-topic for this story, and since this *is* an OpenBSD story, it can't even be called a flamebait (it insults no one else, and certainly not the OpenBSD users).
...and not the best-written piece I've seen on macweek, but reasonable enough. And of course it's another entertaining snub of MacOS (Hey Apple, I'm using OpenBSD because it doesn't suck! Nyah nyah!)
I really would have liked to have seen the article say something about the code review OpenBSD experiences. Surely someone can set this guy straight...
-- "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
I'd love to have Open's level of security, but it won't run on my older Mac clone (PowerBase 240) and its 3rd party USB card. Guess I'll try NetBSD instead. Net runs on pretty much anything made after the last Toaster Mac.
Slashdot Mirror
How can "OpenBSD rules" possibly be off-topic? It's entirely on-topic for this story, and since this *is* an OpenBSD story, it can't even be called a flamebait (it insults no one else, and certainly not the OpenBSD users).
(8-DCS)
I really would have liked to have seen the article say something about the code review OpenBSD experiences. Surely someone can set this guy straight...
"You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
I'd love to have Open's level of security, but it won't run on my older Mac clone (PowerBase 240) and its 3rd party USB card. Guess I'll try NetBSD instead. Net runs on pretty much anything made after the last Toaster Mac.