Could Tesla's Broadcast Power System Work?
Pinball Wizard asks: "I ran into a nice Web site while doing some research on the life of Nikola Tesla. Turns out PBS is doing a special on him, beginning Dec. 12. In case you're not familiar with the man, he invented alternating current and radio, as well as the basic concepts behind all of our wireless control and communication. Besides alerting the Slashdot population to the documentary, I thought I'd pose a question to the EE's in the crowd. Tesla was a bit of a rebel, and many of his inventions never came to light because they conflicted with the interests of corporations or wealthy people with more influence. The most interesting of these to me is the transmission of electricity through the upper atmosphere. Obviously that would make electricity much harder to meter and control by monopolistic interests. Was his idea feasible? After reading about Tesla, I seriously wonder how much we screwed ourselves by following the interests of money, rather than listening to this scientific giant."
Skeptical Inquirer did a cover story on Tesla and the pseudoscience cult that has formed around him:
Skeptical Inquirer
SUMMER 1994 (vol 18, no 4.): `Extraordinary science' and the strange legacy of Nikola Tesla, by Johnson. Nikola Tesla: Genius, visionary, and eccentric, by Johnson.
Their take on it was that he a lot of good ideas, but also a lot of bad ones, and that the common perception of him as an infallible genius is misplaced.
- Fantastic transmission losses. Some enormously large percentage of the power pumped in would be lost (as in 'not serve a useful purpose'.)
- Wildly variable service. In the clear power would theoretically follow the inverse-square law but almost anything would mess with this & cause it to vary: trees, streams, underground streams, wet/dry soil, weather (do not operate in a shower!) and that's well before we get to things like buildings, walls, metal-objects, etc.
- Hazardous local environment. At the energies Tesla was talking every metallic object nearby would be carrying a hefty charge. Touching any of these could well be hazardous: Local fence-wires would sizzle with charge, metal doors could be deadly. I have no idea what this much radiated energy over a long period would do to local biological activity but the simple random shocks alone couldn't be good.
- Disrupt the very devices it was intended to supply. For simple object like a fluorescent tube Tesla coils are great but the minute you try to run something with sophisticated requirements you're hosed. Good grounds would be difficult, power is DC, the supply would vary wildly. Furthermore parts of motors & other devices would be receiving charge almost randomly. I can't imagine trusting something as basic as an elevator winch motor under these conditions much less microelectronics like my digital watch, cellphone, etc.
Look, Tesla is a fascinating (and tragic) character but some of his ideas, were, well, impracticable.I used to work with Tesla coils almost daily & let me tell you they are not a good solution. Indoors and at comparatively low power they were hazardous & required care to operate, scaled up and put into The Real World they'd have been regularly deadly. Not deadly as in once-a-year power-main-fell-on-somebody or Little-Bobby-put-a-hairpin-in-the-socket-&-zapped- himself deadly but random step in a puddle & die deadly, sit between two angled metals walls & fry deadly, metal-fillings in your jaw grow warm & make you ill deadly.
ps For all of those automatically saying we should re-study Tesla's idea & going for the 'underdog': there's a cult out there waiting for you & no I don't want any carnations in the airport.
I don't read ACs: If a post isn't worth so much as a nom de plume to its author then I wont bother either.