Using Distributed Wetware To Analyze Mars Craters
A non-mouse Cow Herd writes: "Here's an interesting NASA project that popped up on sci.space.sience
a while back:
This site
allows volunteers to classify craters on mars, essentially a human
distributed image processing program. They are even
starting a moderation-like quality rating.
So what do you think ? Would you devote your spare cycles to
this ? Will the get quality work or just a lot of First Posts ?" Seems almost (but not quite) paradoxical to use an ultra-high-tech infrastructure to organize non-automated piecework, but until there's a sand mouse for crater-recognition, it seems like a really smart idea.
You proofread OCR'd text for Project Gutenberg using the raw scanned image to fix anything. You can do as little or as much as you want.
but with people. this is just www.amihotornot.com for craters.
Start Running Better Polls