Slashdot Mirror


Run LinuxPPC In A Spare Drive Bay

Knobby was one of the several people to point out a really neat piece of hardware. He writes: "Total Impact just announced (a few days ago) their 'briQ'. It's a PPC G3 or G4 machine measuring 5.74 X 1.625 X 8.9 inches with a single 64bit 66MHz PCI slot, integrated 10/100Mbit networking, a 40GB HDD, and ships with LinuxPPC.. The press release on the page doesn't mention it, but the announcement I received mentioned a starting price of ~$2500.. Note: These are the same folks making the quad G3 and G4 processor PCI cards mentioned in an earlier article." I've long wanted a computer in which the processor / motherboard / memory were as easily removed and replaced as a hard drive, this sounds quite close to that ideal.

25 of 68 comments (clear)

  1. Re:SPARCPlug! by SlashGeek · · Score: 4
    It looks like the SparcPlug was made back in '96 by a company named Ross, now defunct. Here is an article from Byte with a review of the product shortly after its release. It appears that a comany named DataMaster International still sells them here. No price is listed, but they do take quotes.


    "Everything that can be invented has been invented."

    --

    --I assume full responsibility for my actions, except the ones that are someone else's fault.

  2. Re:And the big deal is?? by Knobby · · Score: 2

    The only reason I submited this article, was to counter the "PPC is nice tech, but where can I get it other than Apple" comments.. The point here is not the size, or shape of this board. The point is that someone other than Apple is shipping a PPC machine.. I realize there are a lot of good, small x86 boards out there..

    In all honesty, I don't think a $2500 box with a single G4 processor, a 10/100 adapter, and a 40GB HDD is worth the cash.. Especially, not when I can get a Dual G4 box from Apple for considerably less.. Hell, even the cube is cheaper, and it ships with a DVD

  3. Re:Passive Backplanes by Schnedt+Microne · · Score: 2

    I have a passive backplane 386 processor card somewhere in all my old junk. It has integrated I/O and drive controllers. I used to use it plugged into a two slot backplane. I believe I ran Slackware (probably kernel 1.2.13...) on it for a time. It was awhile ago...

    --
    Hay thar.
  4. Good grief by macdaddy · · Score: 2
    Get off their backs. Those guys do one hell of a good job! They support most of the PPC Linux developement projects! The donate hardware to people like BenH. They host the official PPC Linux Reference Project for all PPC Linux distros to base their distro off of (a common set of underlying components like glibc, etc...). They do a great job. There are others out there that make PPC Linux variants. YellowDog Linux is one of them. They make good stuff too. They just hired former Apple's Linux Technology Manager, Kevyn Shortell, to help them get ready for the 2.0 release of YDL. Back to LPPC, you can't knock them for what they do. Sure they may not have the fanciest name in the world. They were the first true Linux for PowerPC machines (we really can't call Mk a true Linux environment as much as I enjoy it on my old Macs). Since they were the first, I can fully understand why they would want to incorporate "PPC" into their distro name. LinuxPPC just makes sense. Linux for PPC. Until other competitors came along that also made PPC distros, it just made sense. You can't really knock them for their name or what they do.

    --

  5. Re:As always, Economics the factor by Ace905 · · Score: 2

    "This is highly unlikely to result in all sorts of people going out and buying these sorts of machines; it's just not economical unless there's a compelling need that justifies paying a couple grand for a pretty small server."

    The point is that they are available. The $2500 is, in all likelihood, the introductory price based on "how many people want these things?!"... Once a few are sold, I'm sure the price will drop considerably.

    In time little grass-hoppah.... in time....

    Another important thing to note is these machines probably have better heat dissipation than larger machines [I'm basing this on the idea that 1) heat disipation would have to be improved to even offer them, and 2) If they are smaller, they are easier to cool; because moving air can be directed at and away from them with less energy (ie: the diff. between a cpu fan and a case-fan)].. In the least, they would be useful for applications where heat is a problem. I'm sure big bizz. will be buying into them so us little guys can reap the price drop in a year or two.

    ... Still interesting to know we should be waiting for it.

    --

    Ace
  6. Re:for 2,500 you just might buy a whole machine by TWR · · Score: 2
    but you missed the one thing it has that you can't get from any standard desktop market machine, 64bit 66mhz PCI.

    Before Apple put AGP on their towers, they included one 64bit, 66MHz PCI slot and stuck a video card in it. With the introduction of 2x and 4x AGP on Macs, it's gone away.

    -jon

    --

    Remember Amalek.

  7. Shades of the "big board". by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 2

    And the idea of a cpu being on a slot really isn't a bad idea (I think pci would be too slow personally). But why oh why would you need a completely different computer in a drive bay (thats assuming you have any available).

    This is a variant on a design concept dating from the "Big Board".

    For those not familiar with it: The Big Board was a CPM-era machine. In those days when your basic PC was a desktop box the size of a mini-tower, with a front panel full of blinky lights and switches, a pair of EXternal 8" floppy drives. 8080 or Z80 processor, up to 64K of RAM. Alphanumeric dumb terminal or teletype for a console. Brand names like "Altair" or "Imsai" and maybe you assembled it yourself.

    As complex-function chips improved a company had a great idea for a cheap process controller: They built a computer-on-a-board. It had a Z80, 64K (the max) of RAM, RAM-window alphanumeric video generator, two parallel ports (one for the keyboard, one for machine control), a serial port, a boot/monitor ROM, a floppy controller, and all supporting circuitry. But that's not all:

    The board was exactly the same form factor as the electronics card on the floppy disk, right down to the hole placement and power connector. You just bolted it on top of the drive's board (with longer screws and standoff bushings), powered it with a two-drive power supply, stuffed in a floppy, and you had a machine controller. Plug in a monitor, a keyboard, and/or a network connection if appropriate for your application. Program it with the inexpensive CPM development tools.

    Of course what ACTUALLY happened is that the hobbiests got hold of it and used it as a small, cheap, powerful CPM machine for home-computer use. (A little later Xerox licensed the design and built it into a monitor cabinet, to make a CPM machine the form factor of a monitor as their entry into the PC business.)

    But the basic idea remained valid. As drives shrank (physically) and processors advanced to X80s you continued to see strap-onto-the-drive single-board computers ("SBC"s) for industrial process automation.

    This looks like a variant on the idea: Put it in the slot next to the actual drive on a multi-drive bay (or put two drive mounts into your industrial machine), add power and some interface cables, and you're in business. No one-of engineering to automate your industrial machine, so your engineers only have to design the machine itself. The programming environment is the same as the desktops, so you can use off-the-shelf development tools.

    You don't have to reinvent the whole wheel. Just tweak the trim for the new model year. B-)

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  8. Well, I guess this means Utah-GLX and DRI... by Svartalf · · Score: 2

    ...need to get with it and get that PPC support out the door.. :-)

    --
    I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
  9. Re:Other distros? by lupa · · Score: 2

    according to the press release:

    "The briQ also allows the flexibility to run any PowerPC based Linux distribution available."

    i assume that means yellowdog, etc :>

  10. cool, but not as cool as the by green+pizza · · Score: 2

    SPARCplug

  11. Re:computer in a drive bay? by jtownatpunk.net · · Score: 2

    Take one of those old CD-ROM towers and make a cluster. Seriously, tho, get one of those 7-bay towers, load it up, sticky-tape an 8-port switch in there, hook the uplink to a jack on the back and you've got 7 fairly powerful machines in the space of mid size tower case. Takes up less space than 7 1-U rack systems.

  12. Re:computer in a drive bay? by Doctor+Memory · · Score: 2

    One neat use I'd like to see would be in labs for O/S classes. Recompile your kernel, download it to your other box and run it. If it crashes, no problem -- it won't interfere with your development/monitoring box. And it might make it possible to do a "remote" crash analysis for debugging.

    --
    Just junk food for thought...
  13. Re:California's Power problems by Graymalkin · · Score: 2

    If x number of PPC CPUs generate y amount of heat then y is directly proportional to x as such having more PPC CPUs would generate more heat. Fitting these processors into a smaller space (less potential surface area and less air volume) means you're going to end up with heat flow problems. 10 G4 Macs are going to radiate generated heat better than 10 of these little boxes stacked on top of one another due to the fact the G4 towers have the physical capacity to circulate more air.

    --
    I'm a loner Dottie, a Rebel.
  14. Back from Oregon by Graymalkin · · Score: 2

    Yay, finally some news on more people making PPC boxes! I can now rest. Lots of people have been pointing out that a couple years ago you could shell out 9k bucks for a non-UltraSPARC box that could fit inside a PC or that Cubes and G4 towers are cheaper. Who the fuck cares. The cool thing here is more people than just Apple are selling PPC boxes. All the stories of this catagory that get posted always end up bashed because everyone points out Apple and then when Apple actually does something they get bashed. Oh well.

    --
    I'm a loner Dottie, a Rebel.
  15. Actually you're wrong by macdaddy · · Score: 2
    Maybe you should read up on you PPC Linux history. LinuxPPC was out long before the developer reference releases. Yes that's right, the misconception about misceptions that your flaunting is incorrect. The early history of PPC Linuxes is pretty easy to follow. 1) MkLinux, made by Apple and since turned over to the community. Runs on older Nubus machines thanks to the Mach kernel. Also runs on newer models. Doesn't run the latest kernels. Requires the Mach to function at all. Therefore can not be called Linux as we classify it. 2) LinuxPPC. Came out when Mk was still at DR 2.1 (or maybe a wee bit earlier). Ran _real_ kernels. This was back in the Fall of '97. Check your history before you try to sway the tide of misconceptions with more misconceptions.

    --

  16. Apple's 64 bit 66 MHz pci port?! by daniell · · Score: 2
    That's incorrect. This Knowlegebase article for which you'd require a free apple care login (why I don't know), is entitled: Power Macintosh G3 (Blue and White): PCI Expansion Slot Specifications and clearly states that they include:
    • 1 - 66 MHz PCI Bus with one PCI Slot which accepts a 66 MHz 32-bit PCI card.
    • 1 - 33 MHz PCI Bus with three PCI Slots which accept 33 MHz 32-bit or 64-bit cards.
    That's not the same as 1- 66mhz pci bus that accepts 64-bit cards.

    -Daniel

    PS it did sound plausable and interesting though

  17. Re:computer in a drive bay? by Derwen · · Score: 2
    But why oh why would you need a completely different computer in a drive bay

    Damn it, man! did it never occur to you that they might just need companionship. Have you not an ounce of compassion in your body?
    8oP

    --
    http://fsfeurope.org/
  18. SPARCPlug! by Daedalus_ · · Score: 2

    Who needs a Mac in a drive bay when you can stuff a SPARC in there! I remember seeing a "SPARCPlug" by Ross Technologies a few years ago. Wonder what happened to them....

  19. Passive Backplanes by Phaid · · Score: 5

    I've long wanted a computer in which the processor / motherboard / memory were as easily removed and replaced as a hard drive, this sounds quite close to that ideal.

    Also sounds like quite an expensive solution to an already-solved problem. There are a number of manufacturers of passive-backplane systems that provide just that level of convenience. Basically, the passive backplane consists of a long board with something like 6 PCI and 6 ISA slots. This backplane installs in the case in the same position as a traditional motherboard. The CPU/RAM/Chipset "motherboard" is actually just a big PCI card that does bus mastering, and all your other peripherals sit in the slots. You can even get split backplanes, where more than one "motherboard" can coexist in the same case.

    Nice thing about this design is that if any card fails, including the "motherboard", you yank it out and replace it - the backplane itself is so simple it basically never fails. And ventilation is usually better, since all your hot components are in the middle of the case rather than on the bottom or side -- a lot of these cases have a row of big 120mm fans across the entire front, so everything is well ventilated.

    Most of the ones you'll see out there are fairly large (a little bigger than an old-style AT case), but I've even seen and used passive-backplane minitowers. The nice thing about these is that the form factor allows for a lot more room for slots in the case and therefore more peripherals.

  20. As always, Economics the factor by Christopher+B.+Brown · · Score: 5
    At $500, these would likely fly out like hotcakes. (And probably sell at a loss, unfortunately.)

    At $1000, they would be a pretty good value.

    At $2500, Californians care about the power consumption this week, although if things stabilize in a month, they may not care so much.

    For the rest of us, such pricing is daunting unless there's a really compelling application that needs the exact form factor provided.

    This is highly unlikely to result in all sorts of people going out and buying these sorts of machines; it's just not economical unless there's a compelling need that justifies paying a couple grand for a pretty small server.

    --
    If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the precipitate.
    1. Re:As always, Economics the factor by jandrese · · Score: 2

      The problem isn't necessarily how directed the air is, it is the amount of surface area you have available to spread the heat dissipation across. You aren't going to be able to slap a big honking heatsink on this thing (but with the PPC you probabally don't have to) so you aren't going to have as much surface area to work with.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
  21. SPARC by sql*kitten · · Score: 4
    I've long wanted a computer in which the processor / motherboard / memory were as easily removed and replaced as a hard drive, this sounds quite close to that ideal.

    Like a SPARCplug ?

  22. for 2,500 you just might buy a whole machine by twitter · · Score: 2
    G4s with a nice big box, power supply and what not go for $1700 . Go figure.

    Bad Apple, Bad! Why don't you name your freaking gifs so people who don't surf with images can navigate your site? You gotta wonder how blind people navigate trash like that. Hate that site.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

    1. Re:for 2,500 you just might buy a whole machine by daniell · · Score: 2
      I agree, if you want to play with linuxPPC (although debain for the ppc is much better), go ahead and buy a mac, maybe even a $700 old imac.

      but you missed the one thing it has that you can't get from any standard desktop market machine, 64bit 66mhz PCI. That stuff costs REAL money; hence the price is great actually; even if you could retrofit a G4 tower with extra logic for that bus (and I don't think anyone sane can), then it would probably end up costing more than 2500 in total.

      -Daniel

  23. Offload computing, or own IDE/dev server by scotpurl · · Score: 2

    If each developer had their own server (albeit, in their own worksation), they could offload processes to it (have it compile while you're busy fragging), or just use it as a server to test things on. You could also give novice admins their own server to learn with.

    The main thing is, the marketroids have already figured out who the audience is, and have figured out they can make money. It's up to us to come up with new/novel uses. Like, an overly expensive MP3 player for your car.