LinuxPPC Inc Becomes Non-Profit
LWN has an interview with Jason Haas where he talks about LinuxPPC and
going non-profit. He raises some good points and says some interesting things. Good luck to ya Jason! Someday I shall acquire a titanium powerbook, I shall bask in the glory of your toil. I hope LinuxPPC stays around for a long time.
Linus' 2.4 doesn't even compile on the PowerPC. Even PowerPC trees that have 2.4 are quite on unstable. HFS is buggy, and HFS writes will cause kernel panics. Some iMacs randomly crash with Linux 2.4. And there are lots of other problems...
So waiting on 2.4 is probably the safest, and smartest thing to do. Linux 2.2.18 is still a better choice for the majority of users.
I think your misunderstanding - He wants to retain control over his work on LinuxPPC. What's wrong with that? He's not saying he wants to force other people to do anything, just that
a) he wants to do LinuxPPC for a living
and
b) he doesn't want greedy stockholders telling him what to do
Free Software is about both control and no control. You control everything, but you don't control anything of anyone else. So, I don't see the inconsistency.
Engineering and the Ultimate
I mean Red Hat, Caldera, VA Linux and all those guys have been non-profitable for a long time now...
DrLunch.com The site that tells you what's for lunch!
I'm just waiting for Amazon to announce the same thing.
"Now that's a joke, son!"
"People who do stupid things with hazardous materials often die." -- Jim Davidson on alt.folklore.urban
After all, if the paychecks of the LinuxPPC folk depend, to great extent, on CD sales, then it is in their interests for there to be some degree of "churn." Frankly, your phrasing of:
applies pretty much just as much to LinuxPPC, "the nonprofit" as it does to RHAT et al.Consider it stipulated that the factor of third party shareholders deciding they want an extra million in sales goes away; that doesn't make the factor go away altogether.
In contrast, the would-be counterexample you cite, Debian, can "afford" to have rare new releases because a new release doesn't affect their finances at all because they don't directly sell CDs. That's not the same scenario that LinuxPPC has.
If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the precipitate.
But it has been enough to cover the costs of eight staff members.
And the internet connection, and, oh, beer. An essential part of Linux development.
You mean the beer's not free?
air and light and time and space
I think the move to a non-profit organization is more fitting with the ideals of the Free Software movement, and it's going to let LinuxPPC find capital through donations and grants, but still be able to control the distribution instead of giving power to VC's. A very nice move.
Jason's a great guy to talk to, and really a lot of fun to work with. I think we'll be seeing good things from the LinuxPPC gang for a long time.
(And Taco, check out last night's episode of The Mac Show. They talked to a guy from the Int'l Titanium Assoc. and he talked about how to anodize the TiBook's case to create some a cool custom looking PowerBook.)
Taco hath said:
Why? That Titanium PB is made for OS X -- try some BSD-lovin, and you'll never go back to the Dark Side of the Source, Linux.
(gentlemen, start your flamethrowers!)
Potato chips are a by-yourself food.