Sega Announces Dreamcast Successor
aardwolf64 writes: "msnbc.com has a story (taken from Inside.com) about the successor to Sega's DreamCast. Aparently it won't play actual DreamCast discs, but will instead download them to an internal hard drive through a digital cable connection. According to the article: 'Wallace said that the box, called the Games Gateway, can store up to 60 games at a time, and will play any and all of the 350 or so games developed for the Dreamcast platform. The box will ship next year, though Wallace declined to speculate whether it would ship in the U.S. or U.K. first. The deal is mutually non-exclusive; the box itself has been a year in development'"
This doesn't seem to be the next generation of Dreamcast, but rather just a way for Sega to repackage Dreamcast into a new product that they can get some more money out of.
If it's the next generation anything, it's the next generation Sega Channel.
Jon
All opinions expressed herein are my own, and not those of my employers, who are appalled.
For the sake of accuracy, this set-top box is, and never was a successor to the Dreamcast. It is stupid to assume that it is.
Sega made a statement last week that they would be packaging DC technology and licencing it to third-parties. This is not a replacement, nor a replacement to the DC. In fact Sega also stated that they were looking into making a DC PCI-card for PC's... May as well say that Taco's PC is the DC successor as well.
-Jayde
What's a sig?
Since I live in Perth, Australia where cable (as in pay TV) -based internet connections are non-existent and (A)DSL is only available in the CBD an a couple of select suburbs, I have to add a big "whatever" to this discussion. This product is impossible for me to use. Anyway, I don't care -- I'm having fun buying secondhand SNES carts from swapmeets and pawnbrokers. There are enough games out there already that I've never tried such that if all game production were to cease today I'd be dead before I ran out of fun.
Sounds like Sega is limiting its market share by requiring people:
1. Have cable in their residence
2. Care to pay money for a digital cable connection
This restricts both the tech-less (antenna, analog cable), and the tech-savvy (digital satellite reciever). To me, it sounds like a great feature and option, but even with a digital cable line myself I'm not sure I'd want to be restricted to loading new games only at home..especially if it restricted me from taking it to another place (i.e. college dorm, apartment, etc.) without a cable connection.
But it's still a year away from release, so perhaps they'll change their minds and find more reasonable distribution methods.
"The universe seems neither benign nor hostile, merely indifferent." --Carl Sagan