Slashdot Mirror
Get Free World Dial-Up -- With a Few Catches
maken writes: "Remember the Free World Dialup project? From their page: "In the Fall of 1995 several of us had been throwing around the idea of "patching" Internet phone to regular telephone lines in order to allow true "patching" of international phone calls over the Internet - not just for people with computers but for anybody with access to a phone... and this is how the Free World Dialup project got started. As commercial VOIP gateways became available, Free World Dialup II in 1997 was the first free network to provide a free phone to phone service to over 15 countries using commercial hardware and software." Well, they're at it again and are looking for members." It costs about a hundred bucks to become part of it (for hardware), as well as broadband access. Rather reminds of me the ambitious Bayonne Project, (about which more later).
Perhaps this will only be viable then in the U.S. In my area (Phoenix) a residential phone line costs approx $15 per month if you only make local calls. However, I don't know what long distance rates are in the U.S. (email does the job for me), so I'm not sure where the break-even point is.
No. If you shell out $100 (plus extra phone line cost), you get to call any location that has a person in the area who paid $100. The coverage of this service is a bunch of local telephone areas that contain people who are also members.
God, I wish that were true, but it's not.
My small apartment complex has 30 units, if we all had 1.5 Mbit DSL (as I do), we would need a full T-3 - 45 Mbit - to handle our traffic. Hell, we'd need 10 Mbits just to handle our minimum guaranteed bandwidth of 384 Kbits.
There's another such apartment complex right next door. In fact, if you draw a box around the square mile north of the University of Texas campus, and figured that every business, house and apartment in this moderately dense urban area was fed by 1.5 Mbit DSL, you'd quickly get an amount of potential traffic that would saturate every piece of fiber leaving Austin.
Companies are trenching fiber as fast as they can, but they can only lay it so fast. I'm pretty sure DSL/Cable prices are set to ensure an adoption rate slow enough to keep the backbones from being overloaded. If they dropped it $20/month, they wouldn't be able to push packets fast enough to handle the traffic.
Don Negro
Don Negro
Perl 6 will give you the big knob. -- Larry Wall
Which is why all of the big players have alterative service businesses which do make them the money: AT&T for example has it's cable (and cable ISP) services. If and when LD becomes a ubiquitious charge comparable to a standard local phone call (whether due to V/IP or not), these companies will not die out thanks to their other holdings. As things move more digital with all phones using V/IP (once we get IP6), these companies will become a virtual IP, mainly helping to maintain and navigator your phone device to the internet backbone; they'll make their money from the fact that you do need to 'connect' your phone to the internet somehow which is where they will continue to make their service dollars. Of course, those with dedicated connections that they already pay for, like DSL, won't need to repay to use V/IP.
"Pinky, you've left the lens cap of your mind on again." - P&TB
"I can see my house from here!" - ST:
The start and end of daylight saving time is now standardized across the EU. According to http://www.rog.nmm.ac.uk/leaflets/summer/summer.ht ml
, summer time starts at 01:00 on the last Sunday in March, and ends at 01:00 on the last Sunday in October. (That's 01:00 UT (01:00 GMT) in both cases, BTW.) This has been the case since 1998. I believe that this is decided at EU level: when France wanted to change timezone, the other EU countries (except Britain) refused to allow them to change.
I wrote code to handle this nonsense: uk_tz.pl. It's a few routines building on the Date::Manip Perl module - one day I should make it into a derived class, or something. Consider it GPL/Artistic dual-licensed.
-- Ed Avis ed@membled.com
It was those frenchies who fobbed the metric system on us. The brits are still resisting nicely.
:-)
But I do have to agree on the clocks, what with Brit Summer Time, Double Brit Summer Time, and other such nonsense. Add in random start and stop dates for DBST and BST, determined each year by a bunch of insane looneys calling themselves "Parliament" and then getting a Queen (obviously a highly trained chrono-astronomer, she) to approve those dates. This means you can never accurately predict in software routines when those brits will be changing their clocks next year, requiring regular patches to your code. Even M$ has trouble keeping it straight
the AC
Hemos is like...sci-fi fans;he thinks technology is cool, but he hasn't bothered to understand the science it's based on
The way it is decribed on their site, is that one node can only call another node? Can you not call a normal anolog phone? That would reduce its practicality a lot.
It's 10 PM. Do you know if you're un-American?
When I recently looked at the broadband offerings from Telia (Swedish national provider), I was surprised to see that on the "What kind of stuff can I do with broadband" page that they have to convince people they need ADSL/cable, they actually had a link to V/IP software. I thought that was pretty cool.
Of course, your point being that once a substantional percentage of users start using V/IP then they not not feel so generous still stands...
Mike.
Tales from behind the Lagom Curtain
There is no trend of companies having absolute power in the US.
Yeah, and the MPAA didn't have the courts inhibit 2600's freedom of the press.
And that Jon Johanson kid's house was never raided.
Various companies didn't get *sucks.com internet domains transferred to them due to "trademark infringement."
Napster was never [temporarily] shut down due to consumers doing their own file sharing.
Microsoft rules the desktop due to fair licensing tactics.
The DCMA was institued into law for the protection of consumers and artists.
Riiiiight.
One district court judge in the pocket of Time Warner made one ruling in the MPAA's favor. OTOH, Dow Corning was forced to settle for millions when sued over a product that had no harmful effects except in the overexcited imaginations of the scientifically illiterate.
Key words there: "In the pocket of Time Warner." With the nearly recent merger of Time Warner and AOL, they've got the vast majority of the mass media in their pocket. Once you have that, almost nothing is beyond their grasp.
I have no knowledge of the Dow Corning case, but that seems to have more to do with our overexuberant media than anything else. I was arguing that, yes, huge corporate entities do have too much power over the consumer. Overexcited scientists and the media in general do not fit my definition of "consumer."
Er, he isn't in the U.S. The writer didn't say anything about Norway.
My point exactly. The MPAA (An alliance of US companies) *should've* had no say whatsoever in what kind of programming a teenager in Norway chooses to do. Yet they did, soley on might alone.
Let's see -- the revocations were by the UN's WIPO, under a resolution policy promulgated by a nonprofit corporation, affecting only root servers operated by one specific for-profit corporation.
Some non-profit organization that is, acting on the whim of for-profit organizations.
Lots of corporations are ordered to cease and desist from legal activities temporarily when there is a question of legality raised.
Fine, I'll buy that. But the point was that the RIAA wanted Napster shut down by any means neccessary. Probably with the intent to scare Napster Inc into doing it the RIAA's way or no way at all. They succeeded.
So, if corporate power is so great, why couldn't they have been stomped out by the much larger blue-chip IBM?
Because IBM had no interest in stomping them out until it was too late. Besides, IBM was always primarily a hardware company. While IBM was a great stepping stone, had Apple or someone else become the dominant PC maker, Bill Gates might have done just as well on any other system with the kinds of rules he played by.
And the Americans with Disabilities Act wass instituted for the protection of corporate profits...
I don't see the comparison.
Not many people in the industry realize(or will admit publicly) that is thier biggest fear. In 10 years most people in the US and other countries where broadband to the home will be available, will not have a pots line to thier house. Most people will have a cell phone(4 or 5g by then) and will have one number where they can receive calls on their cell, or through thier broadband connection in thier house. They will have a box attached to thier hub that will power the POTS line in their house so they can use all there old phone equipment(wall phones, cordless etc etc).
Most communications will be over IP.. picture this scenario..
Bob in NJ will want to call there buddy Jay in California. Bob's phone # is 609-555-1111 and is provisoned by Jersey Cell company(fictional). He picks up his cordless phone in his house and dials Jays number 213-555-2222 in LA. The call is converted into SIP packets at the box his cordless is attached to. A request is sent out over IP to the Jersey Cell's regional Proxy/Gatekeeper for his area and is routed to the Jersey Cell's border Proxy/GK. The border PROXY/GK check's its routing tables and determines to send a call to 1213XXXXXXX it talks to the PacBell Proxy/GK that it knows about. And then the PacBell GK/Proxy routes the call the to local LA reginoal PRoxy/GK and checks to see if Jay is available. If jay is at home, he'll have the option to pick it up, send to voice mail or his cell phone(his preferences are already defined) or any other adanvanced options that might be availble then.
Never once does this call touch an old Bell legacy landline network except the phone numbers are provisioned under the old system. Because of this the cost for a DOMESTIC call will drop to virtually ZERO.(assuming the FCC and PUC's don't cause to much of a problem) As a result of this, There will be almost no profit to be made from it(really upsetting to telco's) so they will offer enhanced services such as find-me-follow-me, voice mail and loads of other worthless stuff everyone will buy but no one will use...
There will still be a huge market for international VoIP.. it is far cheaper to install VoIP gateways and softswitches in 3rd world countries then laying seperate fiber for phone conncetions when they can bring in Internet Access(ala the new economy) and Phone server at the same time and they can at the change of a fly intercconect with different LD VoIP providers for the best rates, whereas in the old world you'd pretty much have to lay new fiber.
Sorry this is so rambling. Back to the original article here, groups like FWD will be semi-successful but where you'll see real growth in next 2-4 years is when companies like YAHOO or new ones start providing free Proxy/GK servers to link thousands and eventually millions of SIP & or h.323 clients together. There is almost no overhead except for the cost of the Proxy/GK Servers. and evenutally all these companies will Peer with each other creating a new network to route calls. So you'll see a semi-fragmentation where mosts Domestic US calls will be made from your regular phone in your house, go out over IP terminate to another person's house IP and should cost nothing and next to nothing for terminating to a legacy POTS user and even cheaper international rates...
I'll stop rambling now.. but its coming soon... get ready for it....
Why don't those damn British people just adjust their clocks? We have to keep going in and saving their butts from the Germans and what do they reward us with? The metric system and incorrect clocks!
Mmmm.. Donuts
In several countries, things like VOIP are outlawed, for protection of phone companies. Which means that this will be impossible to use to call people in those countries, or recieve calls from them. Considering the trend of companies having absolute power in the US, i wouldnt be surprised if the FBI made a raid on members of this project for participating in activities that could hurt the phone companies.
I am !amused.
According to the site you need a "fixed IP"
as near as I can figure, VERY few people actually have that, so, until that changes I don't really see this going anywhere...
That is almost, but not quite, happening already. Instead of taking over the wires, the government is forcing the indvidual companies who own the wires to share them for a "reasonable"?? fee. MCI/AT&T/Sprint/etc. do not own the wires in many of the places they offer service, but they are stil able to offer their service, because the government is forcing the wire owners to allow them to do so.
Nobody is going to lay down parallel infrastructure when they can get the government to force the owners to allow them to use the existing infrastructure. The government should just take and manage the infrastructure itself. Think of it more like the wires being the roads and the telecom companies being the bus/taxi/limo companies. Ideally, I should be able to hop in my own "car" and use the wires directly.
Edward Burr
Edward Burr
Having a smoking section in a restaurant is like having a peeing section in a swimming pool.
Network access to each citizen then becomes a fundamental right and necesity on par with clean air, water, and (sadly still) access to the physical car/road network.
No private company seems willing to step up and invest the billions in a fiber to the curb national network- this kind of project is government domain. It should be done not for profit, but as a basic service. Then, for more bandwidth a premuim could be charged perhaps.
And IP will never work- we will need a new user-level protocol. Something hardware switched with fixed cell sizes I'd say. (We need low-latency and high bandwidth here)
The idea that all we want is voice communication is silly. Video communication is the way of the future. I am a freshman in college and my girlfriend is a high school senior. I hardly ever get to see her in person but I get to see her every day on the internet! I bought $20 netcams (Logitech QuicCam Express) for me and her, and now we doo FREE video phone calls every day. The audio quality is perfect, and the video is great considering the cheapness of the cammeras.
Basically what I am saying is the Telcos are going down because they simplay CAN NOT compete with this technology. Video is much cooler than voice. I can do video free with the internet. I can only do voice with the telcos and that costs money.
Now if only there were linux or bsd drivers for USB webcams and linux or bsd streaming audio/video apps...
A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
Thanks to the fact that most of the mobile phone companies are now huge multinationals, I can expect my one little device to work in over 100 countries. I am with Vodafone, the British mobile company that is the largest in the world, with the majority of the European, Asian and American market.
Hang on, I'm a Vodaphone customer. Tell me why it cost 300 quid for one month in Hong Kong on my Vodaphone? Roaming charges!
Mobile phone companies charge an absolute fortune for the priviledge of using a mobile phone to call your base country from abroad. The only way to get "reasonable" costs is to use a calling card number while your phone is on a roaming provider.
I agree the mobile is a great way to make international calls from wherever in the world you happen to be, but it ain't anything like as cheap as using local internet access in the local country will ever be.
has really been sucking anyway and looks like they might start blocking the international calls they said I could not make in the first place I think I'll have to sign up and become a node and buy one for my sister-in-law. This is *very* cool and the telcos can go screw themselves.
Cypherpunks: Civil Liberty Through Complex Mathematics. Those who live by the sword die by the arrow.
"Everything that can be invented has been invented."
--I assume full responsibility for my actions, except the ones that are someone else's fault.
That's why it has now decided to limit its free phone from MSN to 5 minutes, considering that free phone is going to be the practice and it will not get much mileage of it. Or is Microsoft and its partner totally unaware of the coming revolution and still hoping to make money off it's customers.
There's always sufficient, but not always at the right place nor for the right folks.
Er, last I checked, Norway was not a U.S. state or territory. Heck, it wasn't even part of the EU.
There's no "we" in team, only "me"
I can't help but feel that this is yesterdays news. I already have a cheap international phone service, and furthermore I can use it anywhere - on the bus, the train, while driving my car. Its called my mobile phone.
GSM roaming is cheap like George Bush is on his way to discovering a cure for cancer. There's just no comparison.
Fact is, landline phone service is and will remain for the forseeable future cheaper to provide in the long term than mobile for a simple reason: There is an infinite amount of wire capacity available, while airspace is already under severe contention. Furthermore, the major investment in wiring is already paid off in most developed countries.
In the United States, phone companies can profitably provide unlimited, unmetered landline phone service for $15/month. Ain't nobody can do that with mobile.
This is not to mention the fact that landline telephony provides better voice quality, and comparatively huge data bandwidth (I've got 1-megabit DSL riding on top of my phone calls).
Mobile is an interesting novelty/status toy, and is genuinely useful for some, and in developing countries without the cash in the bank to cable everyone's home, it's a viable short-term approach. But a rational substitute for landline it's not.
"Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." -- GBS
What would be more interesting would be to arrange something like this as a wireless service. Would work nicely in cities, anyway.
I suspect there are some sort of 900 MHz or 2.4GHz consumer handsets that can be programmed or modified to carry unique IDs.
The transmission equipment for these is cheap; decent digital cordless phones cost US$40.
Participants in the project who have broadband set up a box connected to their network.
When someone wants to call you, they dial a number that goes to a room full of voice cards. The participating wireless base stations are notified. They see if they can find the phone with the appropriate unique ID. The call is thus completed.
Phones could probably most easily be located using a roaming system similar to what the cell phone companies use today.
The major obstacles are (1) potentially, the availability of suitable affordable hardware; (2) someone forking over the dough for the hardware to receive calls, (3) cost recovery for placed calls - hopefully this could be solved through cooperation with an existing landline freephone project, (4) getting enough base stations in the areas where users congregate
If done for free, this should be legal under the provisions of the 2.4GHz rules
"Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." -- GBS
You're obviously trolling a bit, but I'll bite. "Stealing" is a pretty strong term to throw around. If I choose to walk or ride a bike instead of taking the bus, am I "stealing" from the bus company? Of course not. There's a cheaper way to do something, so rather than pay for the expensive packaged product, I'm willing to suffer a bit more inconvenience and do it all myself. If the bus company wants my business back, they can do what they must to make their service more attractive to me-- that's the beauty of capitalism. It doesn't work if consumers are somehow morally obligated to utilize the service in question.
The only way using VoIP would be stealing is if I were somehow illegally obtaining my network connection-- which I'm not. When you pay for an ISP, a good chunk of your monthly charge goes to pay the carriers (people like Sprint, AT&T, MCI, etc.) They may suffer some loss of profit because they can't mark up every 9600bps voice stream to many times its cost, but I'm not stealing their money (and if they were somehow losing money on the deal, they would hike the network access fees.)
As an example, airlines regularly charge much higher fees if you choose to fly midweek or on short notice. This is generally designed to snag business customers and make them pay higher rates than ordinary consumers. But if I choose to plan my business travel over weekends and insure that I make my reservations well in advance, am I stealing from the airlines? Of course not; I'm not breaking the law in any way. If their business model isn't working out, they can always change it. Welcome to the glorious world of capitalism.
Have you noticed that most of the companies on the web providing free pc to phone internationally have discontinued this service? Chances are they were only offering this service for the period of time it took them to establish their service and generate usage by consumers.
This reaks with the word scam on it, but soon we shall find out if this is the case
If you would like to make international phone calls free from your home and if have access to broadband internet access, you should consider joining the Free World Dialup III project.
Well in order for anyone to use the service Broadband is needed which is not going to be easy for people to get provided that Broadband isn't as widely available as a dialup is. One thing to consider is how much your still going to have to pay in Broadband charges to use the service. Is it feasible to use this over a phone line? At least with Verizon my calls are a one shot price and even though their service stinks, there are no gimmicks.
Free phone calls? What's the catch?
Broadband and you have to buy their hardware!!
Each person who is connecting to the network will be required to purchase a Free World Dialup node which will an estimated retail cost of US$ 100 and connect a telephone line (analog POTS) to the RJ-11 jack in the back of the node. As long the person has "always-on" Broadband access to the Net, the node will become a qualified FWD Node and free phone calling will be enabled.
Where is Capt Crunch when you need him.
In addition, Free World Dialup will provide an ability for anonymous voice chatting on the Net, together with our own instant messaging services.
If your accessing via Broadband how are you anonymous?
We are gearing up for our announcement and official launch in March, 2001 and we expect to reach critical mass by June.
This is a big claim and has anyone taken a quick second to think if this is so legitimate why haven't the big companies jumped on the badnwagon as they always do, why haven't VC companies dropped heavy funds on this company? Why don't they even have their own domain?
Anyways enough ramblings although their associates have pretty weird names that reak of scams too
Free PC to Phone (US & Int'l) - Callrewards.com
Free PC to Phone (US & Int'l) - HotTelephone.com
Free PC to Phone (US,UK,Fr) - MyFreeLD.com
Free PC to PC - TrulyGlobal (beta)
Free PC to PC - PalTalk
Free PC to PC - Firetalk.com
Free PC to PC - Visitalk.com
Free PC to PC - Buddyphone
Free PC to PC & Voice Mail (US & Int'l) - BeeCall
Free Internet Call Waiting (US) - BuzMe
Free Internet Call Waiting (US) - WhoIsIt?
Free Internet Call Waiting (US) - CallWave
Free Web based Conference Calling - Conflab.com
"When I was a Buddhist, it drove my parents and friends crazy, but when I am buddha, nobody is upset at all"
There are approx. 35.7 million subscriptions in this country, which is about 54% of the population - see here. And this number is still increasing...
The site doesn't seem to have any information on any new programs, with the exception of the new version number FWD III (third attempt, I presume).
There was one big reason why this project, and a number of similar ones, failed over the last few years. Unmetered access only exists in a few areas of the world, the rest of us have to pay for our local phone calls. When I plug my analog phone line into a SIP gateway and allow people to dial out on it, I end up paying for the local phone call. If I were in a popular place, such as London or Paris, I could end up with a phone bill in the thousands of dollars each month for providing my dialtone to people on the internet.
Does someone have a link to more detailed information on FWD III? It would be interesting to see what they are doing with SIP gateways on broadband connections, just for IP to IP conversations.
the AC
Hemos is like...sci-fi fans;he thinks technology is cool, but he hasn't bothered to understand the science it's based on
The major telecoms players (AT&T, BT, etc) have been aware for some time that the Internet threatens their lucrative international revenues, and took the approach that they should get in on the act rather than mount significant opposition.
... blah ... must not be used to circumvent carrier trunk switches ... blah
But: if everyone and their dog actually starts using these services from home, then the telcos may actually try and start throwing their weight about.
Has anyone actually read their DSL (or for that matter standard phone line) Terms and Conditions to see if this sort of thing is covered? I for one don't even know where the T&Cs for my phone line are!
e.g. This phone line is provided
I never though I would say this, but is there a Telco Lawyer in the house?!
lemme see - so each person who has broad band always on can hook up a phone line that other folks can dial in and out of to get their free long distance phone calls.
This is noble, but I am not that rich yet, to donate both the hardware and the dialup line.
At least they were kind enough to supply this list of other free phone services:
- - - -
Free Telephony Services - 2001 Update
(Note: all "Free" Phone to Phone services have been removed since the services have been discontinued)
As the Free Telephony revolution continues, please visit our friends at the following websites which offer Free Telephony Services:
"It is a greater offense to steal men's labor, than their clothes"
True, but circuit-switched copper networks aren't cheap at all. The only reason they're economical vs. fiber is the capital investment needed to replace them. It's inevitable that most of those copper lines/switches are going to need replacement anyway at some point in the near future, and they're not going to be replaced with more circuit-switched copper (if your Telco has any financial sense.)
A check against the proliferation of VOIP services is the unreliability and limited bandwidth of the internet today. Telcos don't have to adjust to everyone using their computers to make phone calls right away, they have time to build the infrastructure and spread the costs over a number of years (it wouldn't do to crank up data costs, thus driving customers away from that growing market.) Most Telcos know that consumer long-distance as a revenue stream is going the way of the dodo, they just want to make the transition a little bit more graceful.
Thanks to the fact that most of the mobile phone companies are now huge multinationals, I can expect my one little device to work in over 100 countries. I am with Vodafone, the British mobile company that is the largest in the world, with the majority of the European, Asian and American market. With the exception of America, all these regions offer a unified mobile system, and the upcoming 3G liscenses will unify things even more.
Presently I am living in Cuba working on a Journalism project, and my phone works perfectly well here. It has also worked in India, Malaysia, Britain and Germany without any reconfiguring or dificulty. The only place I have difficulty is America, but I hardly ever have reason to go there anyway.
3G liscenses will give me 256kbits of modem connectivity in just a few years, with mobile videophone, easy to use all over the world. I can't help but think that this news is the last gasp of the morbid and dying landline industry, which can see the writing on the wall.
I'll be glad to see the back of landline telephones. In fact, I already have.
You know exactly what to do-
Your kiss, your fingers on my thigh-
You know exactly what to do-
Your kiss, your fingers on my thigh-
I think of little else but you.
During human history, I've noticed that infrastructure follows a certain pattern. For a good example, take roads, something we all take for granted.
During the very earliest parts of the last two millenia, 'roads' were little more than well beaten paths. Relatively few people used them so that they weren't worth providing. Mostly you stayed in your own village and just occasionally, if you were very rich, you took the path to other villages to sell your goods. You had to worry about highwaymen, and didn't feel safe.
Even during the middle ages, what roads there were were maintained by baronies and kingdoms. There were stiff penalties for travel, and overbearing regulations. You didn't cross a landholder's property or bridge even if the road ran through it without paying the toll if there was one. The barons were responsble for keeping their own roads safe, but frequently did not.
In modern times, so many people use the roads for so many reasons that the local and country governments have become responsible for maintaining them out of tax money, with no profit whatsoever. Their existence buffers the economy by providing an avenue for commerce, shipping, and travel.
Apply this same pattern to the phone system. Before communication became important, only individuals used radio or line communication because of its relative cost and danger. Someone could easily overhear your private conversation. Before the telephone systems became 'accepted', the only real use for remote real-time two-way communication was to radio different parts of a battle for combat instructions.
Fast forward to today. We have the equivalent of 'divine right of kings'-granted baronies on our communication systems. Only a few hand-picked individuals or companies have control over a vast amount of infrastructure. This is true for the U.S. and most of the rest of the world. True, the phone companies are responsble for it's cost and upkeep, but let's get serious here. Just how good is the U.S.'s phone system, even with the modicum of competition we have? Phone companies *could* be laying DSL to every home, building, or apartment but they're not.
In the future, time being the only variable, we'll move into the stage where so many people use the communication infrastructure so much that it will be impossible to make a profit on. At the same time, it will be a necessary commodity for any given country's economy. The government will either rapidly or gradually assume control of the phone system, and like the roads, we'll assume 'free' use of them in exchange for tax dollars.
If you think about this, this is already happening with the power-system in California. The government is paying for juice at taxpayers expense. This isn't likely to change in the near future.
The next Slashdot story will be ready soon, but subscribers can beat the rush and slashdot the links early!
When it's 8 pm in California, and you think your UKian friend that you 've chatted with on IRC might appreciate a free phone call using this technology, please consider the time difference.
A 3 am wazzup will not go very far in improving international relations.