Atomic Optics Uses Light To Focus Atom Beams
dcshoes writes: "Nonlinear Atom Optics uses laser light to cool atoms to one millionth a degree Kalvin. At this low temperature, atom wavelengths are elongated, making the wave nature of atoms more easy to observe, and enable scientists to focus, reflect, defract, etc, atom beams. Atom lasers could lead to advances in, among other things, Nanolithography and Holography. Cool. Literally."
What are the odds that a story appears on both slashdot and memepool at the same time? Talk about a cross-over hit!
SQLTeam.com - For SQL Server developers and Administrators
Atom Optics Technologies Could Be Phenomenal, UA Theorist Says
Does this sound like a story title from "The Onion"(tm) to anyone else?
Fight censors!
"Not my manner of thinking but the manner of thinking of others has been the source of my unhappiness." - M
Does anyone make one of these to fit on a crib? The $CHILD_PROCESS is 6 months old now, and nothing pisses her off like going to bed. We need something to quiet her down. A quantum state of relaxation on her part would enable a good nights sleep for me and the SO.
--
--
"Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
So the Doctor on Star Trek: Voyager might actually be possible, but he'd be really, really cold.
Since the atom is also emitting photons in random directions, it settles down to a minimum kinetic energy / temperature of about 240 microKelvin (for Sodium, for example). To cool atoms furter, you have to add in magnetic traps, then selectively "heat" the hottest atoms with RF energy to "boil" off the highest part of the temperature distribution to result in a lower average temperature of the condensate.
Check the MIT Center for UltraCold Atoms for more details.
Muerte
Can you explain what a 'negative' temperature would be, given that 0k is the absence of all temperature? I assume this is some kind of quantum theory thing...
can you elaborate a bit? I've never heard of 'negative heat' before.
Can someone explain how you cool something with a laser? That seems a bit counter-intuitive.
---
https://www.accountkiller.com/removal-requested
Damn... I can't help it. Seeing Bill Nye the Science Guy mentioned on here means I have to post this:
Bill Nye killed in Experement!
Yes - it's a joke (it's at The Onion, of course it's a joke!)
Davis Ray Sickmon, Jr - looking for something to read? Check out my three free novels at MidnightRyder.org
Damn near imposible to do stuff like this at anything but super cold temps, there is just to much thermal energy in room temperature air (or anything else) which knocks stuff out of whack.
Erlang Developer and podcaster
With an operational temperature of less than one Kelvin, I don't think this will catch on for mainstream holographic applications. It's hard enough to find a hot babe in real life, now you're going to tell me that the virtual ones are all literally frigid?
Damn.
Steven
-- I have marked myself unwilling to moderate-- I don't have other accounts to artificially inflate the karma of
Erm. I've been seeing this alot, lately. Memepool had it, as did the acme heartmaker linked off that page (cute!).
Can anyone explain why this phrase in broken english is gaining popularity? Are the elite doods getting as sick and tired of their numerals as the rest of us? Is it a reference to something beyond my ken, or just something someone made up?
Hmm, I'm wondering if it's worth it to read replies anymore. Here's a thought, on the user info page, let us know who, as in username, replied to our posts. That way I don't waste my time reading replies from idiot ACs. Just a thought.
Steven
-- I have marked myself unwilling to moderate-- I don't have other accounts to artificially inflate the karma of
Sounds like nuclear powered drinks server, for measuring out *really* cold vodka.
PigPog.
Ultracold plazma and good old Fermi degeneracy. Both from scientific american.
Someone you trust is one of us.
No, no ! This is the Kalvin scheme. 200 Kalvin is one Hobbes. Hey, it makes as much sense as Fahrenhiet ;-)
The temperature scale is "Kelvin", not "Kalvin". And the measurements are known as "Kelvins", not "degrees Kelvin" (any physics student knows this). The proper phrase would be "to one millionth of one Kelvin".
Thank you.
Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum viditur.
I only post comments when someone on the internet is wrong.
Kalvin? Isn't a bit unfair on Hobbes to reduce Kalvin so much? Would you like such small friend?
Seriously though, it's Kelvin, named after the scientist, and it's not degrees Kelvin, it's simply Kelvin, since Kelvin is an absolute scale.
For those who don't know, 1/1000000th of a Kelvin is very very slightly above absolute zero, the temperature at which there is absolutely no molecular movememnt (because there's no heat energy). 0 K = absolute zero - 272 degrees Celsius.
Kelvin is the same as the Celsius (1 K= 1degree C), but with absolute zero as 0 instead of 0 as the freezing pt of water at normal conditions.
They use the same technology in the latest atomic clocks at NIST. Pretty cool stuff, they have a video there to check out that shows how the lasers make a ball of supercooled cesium and fling it up in the air to make a clock. Check it out.
Learn how a CPU works before you learn to program. Seriously.
I always direct people to the Usenet Physics FAQ:
r at ure.html
http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/neg_tempe
They say it better than I could, and what's more they understand it, I just parrot it.
FatPhil
-- Real Men Don't Use Porn. -- Morality In Media Billboards
Also FatPhil on SoylentNews, id 863
And as for the atomic holography... I'd be surprised to see applications like this for ordinary objects. Scanning objects to determine their structure might be possible, but you would probably prefer to go vector here, not bitmap. Maybe you could use this to grow crystals of carbon, silicon, and iron, other basic materials. You could even dope them.
I think matter computers are going to be wild. Just the fact that it's the exact opposite direction we are going now (ie: using energy to direct matter instead of using matter to direct energy) tells me this is a paradigm-shift kind of tech. Maybe with quantum computers made from atomic lasers, we can come up with a whole new way to model things (put some handles on chaos?), and THOSE will allow us to know how to build complex--even living--structures, one atom at a time.
It's something science fiction has promised us: so why shouldn't it be so?
Now, if only we could use lasers to transcend time and space, become enlightened, and quit abusing ourselves and our environment. That would be nice.
We thieves, we liars, we vandals, and poets. Networked agents of Cthulhu Borealis.
Some thermal-non-equilibrium configurations can be described by a negative temperature (e.g. the population inversion in the active medium of a laser).
First a clarification of the term "temperature":
Temperature is a number that describes the distribution of a set of particles over the energy, i.e. how many particles have what energy.
At T = 0 Kelvin all particles would have 0 energy (not possible). At T > 0 K there are some particles with higher energy: the higher the energy, the fewer particles you will find that have this energy. The exact distribution is given by a formula called "Maxwell-Boltzmann-Law" (or its quantum mechanical analogues) which gives the number of particles at an energy E for a system having the temperature T.
Now at T < 0 K the distribution is: the higher the energy, the MORE particles you will find that have this energy. The reason why this is called a negative temperature is that sometimes such distributions can be described by the Maxwell-Boltzmann formula with a negative T.
This kind distribution is not stable, it's called "non-equilibrium", because most particles with high energy will tend to give energy to particles with lower energy and the system will approach a T > 0 K distribution.
"Heat" is something different than temperature, it's basically a synonym for energy.
I believe that CU Boulder has the record for ultra low temperatures.
The Joint Institute for Laboratory Astrophysics (JILA) at CU Boulder has been producing true Bose-Einstein condensates (BEC) since 1997 and Fermi-Dirac digenerate gasses since 1999. I say true BEC because technically superfluid helium-4 and helium-3 exhibit some of the properties of BECs, although they can be called BECs they are do not follow all of the statical mechanics that a true BEC follows.This press release about the creation of the first true BEC mentions that they were able to get rubidium atoms to 20 billionths of a degree K, or 20 nK in 1995. They have reached much lower temperatures since then, I think a year and a half ago they had something like 900 pK. From what I was told less then 6 months ago the now much large group of atomic physicists working on BECs in the JILA tower still hold the record.
To learn more about the BEC follow this link.
Disclamer - Opinion of Person
Latest News: Intel to buy rights to laser - Technology required to keep next future Pentium V processor from overheating...... :-)
--
This is exactly what Steven Chu, Claude Cohen-Tannoudji and William D. Phillips got their Nobel Price in Physics for back in 1997. They've been working with this kind of stuff since approx. 1985. Cool stuff, though (no pun intended).
Sorry if this info has been posted earlier on the list, I didn't have time to read through it, just wanted to inform you geeks (and geekettes).
SIG: TAKE OFF EVERY 'CAPTAIN'!!
That, I understood. Appreciated.
A Danish scientist, Lene Hau, is using the same technology in her Harvard lab, she cools down Caesium (I think this is it) and sends light through it. The light is then stored as information in the Caesium atoms and thus is brought to a complete stop. She can hold the light there for as long as she wants, and release it again when she wants...pretty cool stuff :)
Helsinki University have acheived macroscopic temperatures measured in pK (pico-Kelvin). I believe that the most recent record was circa 18 months ago.
I feel obliged to plug this result as I had dinner with the daughter of one of the professors only 2 weeks ago.
There are pathological non-macroscopic situations where lower _even negative_ "temperatures" are involved. However, there require setting up bizarrely improbable situations with only small numbers of atoms (hence this is not a macroscopic situation). The laws relatiing entropy to temperature prove that in order to be that improbable, the temperature must be negative!
(Method - line up polar atoms in a strong field, reverse the field as quickly as you can - voila you now have almost every atom pointing in the wrong direction - now _that_'s improbable.)
Phil
-- Real Men Don't Use Porn. -- Morality In Media Billboards
Also FatPhil on SoylentNews, id 863