Re:...And A Patch Close Behind It.
by
Lizard_King
·
· Score: 5
From the Alan's email to LWN:
o Fix 48 misspellings of interrupt (André Dahlqvist)
o Fix 20 misspellings of successful (André Dahlqvist)
o Fix 11 misspellings of suppress (André Dahlqvist)
o Fix 46 misspellings of address (André Dahlqvist)
o Fix 26 misspellings of receive (André Dahlqvist)
o Fix 7 misspellings of acquire (André Dahlqvist)
o Fix 4 misspellings of unneccessary (André Dahlqvist)
o Fix 13 misspellings of until (André Dahlqvist)
André Dahlqvist is fusing the line between English major and CS major.
-- "My mother never saw the irony in calling me a son-of-a-bitch." - Jack Nicholson
Re:New 2.4.x Compilation issues under Debian unsta
by
garett_spencley
·
· Score: 5
You have a new version of binutils installed that handles the -o flag differently. You need to edit/usr/src/linux/arch/i386/boot/Makefile and change all -oformat to --oformat.
Aparently this has been known about for a couple weeks and a patch has been made but for some reason didn't make it in 2.4.2
--
Garett
Re:This kernel numbering is confusing
by
Decado
·
· Score: 5
Because the linux advocates constantly criticise microsofts service packs means of upgrading. Buy windows 2000 and you have to download 1 service pack and thats means its a terrible OS that needs constant patching. Download linux 2.4.0 then 2.4.1 and then 2.4.2 in less than half that timespan and rather than meaning that 2.4.0 was a terrible OS that needs constant patching it is an innovative OS with a rapid turnaround.
Am I the only one who spots the hipocracy here?
--
Slashdot: Proof that a million monkeys at a million typewriters can create a masterpiece
This kernel numbering is confusing
by
typical+geek
·
· Score: 5
Why can't Linux just name it, like Linux 4, Service Pack 2?
André Dahlqvist is fusing the line between English major and CS major.
"My mother never saw the irony in calling me a son-of-a-bitch." - Jack Nicholson
Aparently this has been known about for a couple weeks and a patch has been made but for some reason didn't make it in 2.4.2
--
Garett
Because the linux advocates constantly criticise microsofts service packs means of upgrading. Buy windows 2000 and you have to download 1 service pack and thats means its a terrible OS that needs constant patching. Download linux 2.4.0 then 2.4.1 and then 2.4.2 in less than half that timespan and rather than meaning that 2.4.0 was a terrible OS that needs constant patching it is an innovative OS with a rapid turnaround.
Am I the only one who spots the hipocracy here?
Slashdot: Proof that a million monkeys at a million typewriters can create a masterpiece
Why can't Linux just name it, like Linux 4, Service Pack 2?