Slashdot Mirror
Tevatron Beams Turn On At FermiLab
skwang writes: "This press release at Fermi National Accerator Labratory (FermiLab) announces the start of "Collider Run II." FermiLab collides protons and anti-protons in order to study high-energy phyisics (HEP). One of the labs goals is to find the Higgs Boson, an elementary particle that couples with mass. More information about Run II Physics can be found at the FermiLab Web site or at the detector Web Sites: D-Zero (D0) and
Collider Detector at FermiLab(CDF)"
the first link to the fermilab is www.gnal.gov, it should be www.fnal.gov
You can find it at http://www.bnl.gov/bnlweb/pubaf/pr/bnlpr020801.htm
It's called the g-2 experiment at Brookhaven National Lab.
Well, it was muon precession measurements, and although it got a lot of press I'd hardly say a 2.7 sigma deviation rules anything out. I wouldn't be surprised if improved calculations and more data made this go away, just like all of the other false alarms in recent years.
No, but I am curious as to what Burt Reynolds and Dom DeLuise's involvement might be. Do you think Jackie Chan will have a cameo?
"The deep-fried Mars bar is a symptom of a wider crisis." -- Nutritionist Ann Ralph, on the Scottish diet
I can send you a topo if you want it. :)
--SONET
Any fool can criticize, condemn and complain and most fools do. --Benjamin Franklin
My last AutoCAD drawing was of the particle accelerator at Fermi for the National Department of Energy. What a bitch that was. The funny part was, they sent me cut up hard-copy drawings to go from along with what they wanted added on hand-drawn on the work (placement for a ton of fiber!); the majority of my work was piecing together what they already had (which had been drawn in AutoCAD before - and they still had the AutoCAD files). It is policy for them to do it this way so people don't pass top-secret information in the drawing files. In a way I can see what they are thinking, but in another way... what a huge waste of money. I charged them quite a bit to re-create something they already had.
Anyway, those plans were such a pain that they brought me to quitting AutoCAD completely. Even though they paid me quite well, it just wasn't worth the hassle. heh
--SONET
Any fool can criticize, condemn and complain and most fools do. --Benjamin Franklin
Paris: Captain, the Borg are trying to pull us in with a tractor beam!
Janeway: Direct a Tevatron pulse through the deflector grid, that should disable their tractor beams.
Lowmag.net
Mr. Freeman, so good to see you today... You're wanted in the Tevatron laboratory right away!
Wah!
I've got a few friends that work over at Fermi, they've been cutting back the work force to increase spending on their colliders. In fact they are working on one right now that will send a proton through the earth and collide in Minneapolis. Can't wait to see the results of that.
----------------------------------
Looking for hardware (Currently need: Large Etch-a-Sketch) Have one? See my journal!
They have over 2000 nodes running Linux including desktops and farm workers, with plans to buy 100s more this year. One of the coolest things is seeing Linux being used right next to the Origin 2ks and Sun boxes...
--------
-------
"Every artist is a cannibal, every poet is a thief."
Yeah, I'd be inclined to agree for the most part...
-- www.RoachMcKrackin.com
If, indeed, the "clobbering" refers to the g-2 muon anomaly experiment recently completed by Brookhaven, then it has no effect on the relevance of Run II. In fact, if you read the press release and other information on the Fermi Lab website, you'll realize that both experiments have similar purposes: to probe physics beyond the Standard Model, such as supersymmetry. These additional elements enrich the Standard Model, definitely not clobbering it.
Yeah, but you seem to be a Debian user, and /. readers prefer Mandrake this week, so don't expect to be modded up, or anything like that!
FP.
(if I have to say '+1 funny not -1 troll', then it probably wasn't funny, was it? Ooops)
--
Also FatPhil on SoylentNews, id 863
Mother of god, a trillion electron volts thru a pair of sport sandals? That can't be good for my feet!
While I'm sure it kicks the ass of the tree-hugging Birkatron, I have to believe that something like the Nikatron will eventually replace it due to reduced, off-shore labour costs.
To split some more hairs, actually Newton's gravitational theory is more properly defined as an approximation of a more general theory (General Theory of Relativity), just as Newton's Laws of Motion are the zero-velocity limits of Special Relativity.
"That's not even wrong..." -- Wolfgang Pauli
Let's hope they don't blow a hole in the Bozon layer ...
Dave
funkbrain is misleading when he says Newton's theory is "incorrect". The test of a theory is the extent to which its predictions match experimental data. Newton's theory is not incorrect, rather it is not as accurate as the theory of General Relativity. Indeed, it is usually impossible to prove that a theory is 100% correct since it is impossible to test the infinite number of conditions it predicts. If Newton's theory of gravitation is "incorrect", why do engineers, astronomers, astro-physicists use it every day? Newton works well except in very special circumstances, in these cases GR is more accurate.
Then again, an army of hundreds of thousands of railcampers is never good.
"Ancillary does not mean you get to rule the world." --U.S. Circuit Judge Harry Edwards, speaking to the FCC's lawyer
Expect the next Katz article to be "Bosons in the Workplace"...
Will the real Bruce Perens Please Stand Up
Thanks,
Fred Gray
Well, using it is one thing, but our group's experience with Linux wasn't anything better than our experience with Windows. It was just different problems to get around. Hardware compatibility was also huge issue since we were doing processor and graphics intensive simulations, and we were unable to buy the best equipment. The decision to use Linux was made not because of it's features, but because the price was right.
Believe it or not, the first railgun was developed during World War 2! It was designed to act as an anti-aircraft weapon that couldn't be spotted by muzzle flashes (and thus attacked from the air).
Unfortunately the muzzle velocity never reached what the military concidered a pratical level, but imagine if it had! Railguns used in World War II? What a concept!
Fuzzy Knights: New RPG Strips Tuesday and Friday!:
http://www.fuzzyknights.com
Well, the Higgs Boson is the last item in the Standard Model, and finding it would complete the Standard model. Unfortunately, recent boson precession measurements show the Standard Model is wrong. Oh well, it's still kinda nice to explain mass. Even in a dead model!
Run II is actually divided into 2 parts, a and b with a shutdown for upgrades between the two parts. The entire run is supposed to last 3 (or 5?) years and have an integrated luminosity of 10 fb-1. Each experiment (D0 and CDF) is expected to take somewhere between 1 and a few petabytes of data (yes, that's PB = 1000 TB = 1000000 GB plus or minus 1000 vesus 1024 or so). It is expected that this dataset will contains 1000's of top quark events and a few 100 Higgs events (assuming that the Higgs mass is low and in the Tevatron energy range).
Dr. Frank J. Nagy Fermilab Computing Division Authentication and Directory Services Group
The proposal for the detector said that it would have a luminosity of 2 fb-1 (inverse femto-barns for those who don't know the units) but the techs at Fermilabs have a reputation of getting better then predicted luminosity. It is probably too early to tell, but does someone know if they have once again done better then expected? Talking with my advisor 2 fb-1 isn't good enough to get reliable information on the existance of the Higgs, and considering I am doing some research in Supersymmetry I am very interested the potential discovery of a "low" energy higgs.
Disclamer - Opinion of Person
"Mrs. Tweedy, Mrs. Tweedy! I tell ya, those particles, they're organized!"
Did this go through anybody else's head when the read "Collider Run II"?
www.eFax.com are spammers
Here's the text of the article, since it seems to be borderline /.'ed:
Batavia, Ill-Officials at the Department of Energy's Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory today (March 1) announced the start of Collider Run II at the Tevatron, the highest-energy particle accelerator now operating in the world. Researchers at Fermilab hope that high-energy particle collisions at the Tevatron in Run II will yield significant, long-awaited discoveries about the fundamental nature of matter in the universe.
Fermilab Director Michael Witherell expressed satisfaction at the culmination of the laboratory's decade-long preparations for Run II and anticipation of the scientific opportunities it will provide.
"I am delighted that we are starting Run II on time," Witherell said. "Now we can look forward to the excitement of seeing new physics results. We can't predict what Nature has in store for us. All we can guarantee is the opportunity for discovery."
Like Witherell, many Fermilab scientists stressed that, while they have models and theories, they do not know what new physics Run II will reveal. Nevertheless, world attention has focused on Fermilab's two collider detectors at the Tevatron, CDF and DZero, as the next possible venue for discovery of the Higgs boson, an as-yet-unseen particle that physicists believe may determine the property of mass. Late last year, experiments at the Large Electron Positron collider at CERN, the European Laboratory for Particle Physics, detected hints of what might have been signals of the Higgs. However, the LEP accelerator shut down before scientists there could either confirm or rule out a Higgs sighting. If the Higgs boson does exist at a low enough mass, Fermilab experiments may be able to detect it during Run II.
Run II also has the potential for revealing much more new physics, including evidence for a theoretical model known as supersymmetry, signals of possible extra dimensions in the universe, new insight into the asymmetry between matter and antimatter and a better understanding of the top quark, discovered at Fermilab in 1995 during Collider Run I. All are subjects with profound implications for modern particle physics and for the understanding of the fundamental physical workings of the universe.
"Two recent results from other experiments add to the excitement of Run II," said Fermilab theorist Joseph Lykken. "The results from Brookhaven's g-minus-two experiments with muons have a straightforward interpretation as signs of supersymmetry. The increasingly interesting results from BABAR at the Stanford Linear Accelerator Center add to the importance of B physics in Run II, and also suggest new physics. I will be shocked and disappointed if we don't have at least one major discovery."
During Run II, beams of protons at an energy of 980 billion electron volts will collide with beams of antiprotons at the same energy, for a total energy of 1.96 trillion electron volts at the collision point, a 10 percent increase over the energy of Run I. However, the greatest enhancement of the Tevatron's capability will come from the use of a new injection accelerator, the $260 million Main Injector, completed in 1999. The Main Injector and other improvements will permit a much greater rate of high-energy collisions in the Tevatron, providing more than a 20-fold increase in the number of particle collisions observed and recorded at the particle detectors. Because the new phenomena that physicists are seeking occur extremely rarely in particle collisions, the increased collision rate is critical to making discoveries.
Although Collider Run II officially began on March 1, it will take some weeks before Fermilab physicists begin seeing physics results from the upgraded and newly configured Tevatron.
"Turning on the Tevatron is not like turning on a toaster," said Fermilab Operations Chief Robert Mau, whose department operates Fermilab's accelerators. "Besides the approximately seven miles of particle beam enclosures, the accelerator complex includes 44,000 controllable devices and more than a hundred thousand readbacks. Millions of components, circuits and parts all have to work together. The Tevatron is one of the most complex devices on earth. It takes a while to get it up and running."
Mau expects to see proton beams in the Tevatron within a few days. Experiment collaborations at the CDF and DZero detectors should begin observing proton-antiproton collisions later in March. The collaborations, each comprising about 550 physicists from universities and laboratories throughout the nation and the world, have each completed five-year, $100-million upgrades to take advantage of the Tevatron's enhanced capabilities.
"Our sensitivity to new physics comes not only from the big increase in numbers of collisions," said CDF collaborator Rob Roser. "We gain an additional factor due to beam energy and a further increase due to the improvements in our detector. For top-quark physics, for example, we are looking at about a 50-fold improvement over Run I."
Run II will continue, with a mid-course interruption for further upgrades and improvements to accelerators and detectors, until 2007. At about that time, results will begin to emerge from a new accelerator, the Large Hadron Collider at CERN, which will have seven times the Tevatron's energy and will overtake the Tevatron at the high-energy frontier. Fermilab scientists are eager to make the most of the opportunities now before them.
Experimenter Robin Erbacher expressed the prevailing sentiment among physicists at the laboratory after five years of work and preparation for Run II.
"I'm ready to get my hands on some data and analyze it," Erbacher said.
Fermilab is operated by Universities Research Association, Inc., under contract with the U.S. Department of Energy, whose Office of Science funds more than 90 percent of the federally supported research in high-energy physics in the United States.
There's a comment in the main post about the Higgs "coupling with mass". The Higgs Boson doesn't couple to mass, rather, it gives a mass to fermions through a coupling of the form HYY, where H is the Higgs and Y are fermions. When the Higgs has a non-zero expectation value this effectively looks like the fermions have a mass term. Also, it's not quite right to say that the measurements of the muon anomalous magnetic moment are out of line with Standard Model predictions. I'd love it if these experiments are in fact showing us indicators of physics beyond the Standard Model, but there are a lot of factors that go into calculating g-2, any one of which might explain the recently observed value.
Linux at Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory
Tevatron? How did they get electronics into my sandles? ;) Gives new meaning to going for a power walk, too!
(cf http://www.Teva.com)
I guess this explains the splattered whale carcass and smashed flower and pot in my front yard...