Slashdot Mirror
One Click Setback for Amazon
dbrutus writes "Amazon lost its bid to continue a preliminary injunction against BarnesandNoble.com. You can find a press release to give you all the details."
← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)
← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)
Well this isn't a total victory, IMHO, but is close to one. At least the legal and governmental entities involved are starting to actually think about the big picture.
Personally, I'm hoping that this causes a review of other ridiculous patents, and raises public awareness of patent abuse. Certainly the one-click patent is so breathtakingly stupid that if the general public hears about it, it'll be extremely humiliating for Amazon (and those who liscenced the idea).
To quote one of my co-workers: no one should be able to patent something that could be designed by a marketing department.
"The Sage treasures Unity and measures all things by it" - Lao Tzu
> Refunds for Apple and the other firms who licensed the one click?
Yeah, Amazon is setting up a one-click refund site.
--
Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
And while we're at it, how many other firms all together paid Amazon for a license?
Does anyone out there know the terms? It is an annual license fee or lifetime? And how much?
A message from our sponsor
Hehehe
6 5ca7-043108e0.. read the last line..
http://www.segfault.org/story.phtml?mode=2&id=3aa
Onion
http://twitter.com/onion2k
(Note to editors, if there is a date in a press release from a submission, and if that date is more than a few days old, it's a good chance the story's been posted already, particularly in this case. But of course, this assumes that editors read the articles that are submitted).
"Pinky, you've left the lens cap of your mind on again." - P&TB
"I can see my house from here!" - ST:
It's a sad state of affairs when we're surprised that a court comes down on the side of of common sense. That said, this is a nice preliminary finding, and we can but hope that the rest of the case proceeds in a similarly reasonable manner (whatever the result).
In particular, I like the part about patents being distinguished by technique and not application, so you don't necessarily get a new patent just for writing down some existing art and pencilling "...but on a web page" on the end.
Is the US legal system in danger of finally getting a clue, do we think? ;)
If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.