Slashdot Mirror


IBM Gets 30 Days Community Service

CelestialWizard writes "Linuxworld have this story regarding the IBM employee that has been ordered to perform 30 days community service for spray painting "Peace, Love and Linux" ads on Chicago sidewalks. See the older story."

5 of 147 comments (clear)

  1. What? You think $18k for global publicity is waste by dustpuppy · · Score: 5
    You know, even here in Australia we heard about the IBM Linux advertising campaign and I'm sure it was reported in many many other countries. And it was reported not just in the IT section, but in the main news section.

    For $18k, hundreds of thousands of people around the world heard about Linux and heard that the most recognised IT company in the world is backing it. So not only has the Linux 'brand' gained further publicity (and hence acceptance) around the world, but it's also gained legitimatecy (sp?) by having a blue chip IT company associated with it. That kind of publicity is worth millions and millions of dollars.

    So stop thinking small, and think big picture and you will see that this $18k was a great investment in Linux.

  2. Let him keep developing Linux! by dido · · Score: 5

    Well, isn't developing for Linux a community service? ;)

    --
    Qu'on me donne six lignes écrites de la main du plus honnête homme, j'y trouverai de quoi le faire pendre.
  3. Facts different by augustz · · Score: 5
    Of course, the facts in this case are a bit different than the story and the submitter make them out to be.

    He's not an IBM employee, they hired a firm, like any other large company, to do a promotional campaign.

    That company obviously screwed up, campaign materials called for non-permanent medium, though that would likely have been illegal as well.

    IBM did the right thing by helping with the cleanup.

  4. Boggle... by ryarger · · Score: 5

    International Business Machines Performs Act of Civil Disobedience to Promote Open Source Operating System....

    In other news:
    Ariel Sharon plans pilgrimage to Mecca
    George Bush honored at Mensa ceremony
    Tempratures in Hell drop sharply

  5. Street control by sakusha · · Score: 5

    This reminds me of what happened on a film set a few years back. The filmmakers of "The Doors" wanted an authentic indian cave where they could film on location with indian petroglyphs in the background. They received permission on the explicit understanding that no indian petroglyphs were to be touched. Except an art director didn't get it, he thought the petroglyphs didn't come up clearly enough on camera so he painted over them with a water based paint. He completely covered every written character with dark paint. The petroglyphs were originally done in water based pigments, he thought he could wash off his overpainting but that would have washed off all the original petroglyph too. Now there is nothing left but the dumb art director's painting. Another wonderful cultural relic raped, pillaged, and destroyed by Hollywood greed-heads.
    Anyway, the laws used to prosecute IBM are a two-edged sword. Street artists go up against fines like this all the time. I recall artists like Robbie Conal in Los Angeles plastering posters of political satire all over the city. An artist I knew did an amazing mural under a bridge in downtown LA. He painted it in reflective paint, you couldn't see it in the day, only at night by your car's headlights. And the city decided to paint over it. Another artist I knew did a series of oddly beautiful mini-murals, with the message "Justice Just Is." The city went out of its way to paint them over immediately. LA has laws to protect stupid murals from the days of the Olympics, but doesn't hesitate to paint over the street artists. And I'm not talking graffiti taggers, these were serious artists with no other way to reach the public except directly. I'm not sure I endorse the concept of the city government having total control of the public space and who can say what in public. I know advertising doesn't really enjoy the same first amendment protections, but when the same laws are used to suppress advertisers as well as artists, I sense a slippery slope ahead.