Re:optical detection sounds hard
by
Mark+Hood
·
· Score: 5
> wouldn't we have to depend on the fact that
> the other civilization know that we are right
> here, and that we are able to pick up their
> signals?
Yes, that's true if we assume they're trying to contact US specifically. If they've just got a huge laser on the top of their local Everest-sized mountain & are relying on their planet's rotation to turn it into a beacon we have a better chance of spotting it.
If we try to pick up radio we can (in theory) spot their TV signals, satellite communications & Star Wars ABM radars:)
> No matter what kind of transmission ET is using
> he will have to hope that we are able to pick
> up the signals
Of course - and that's why the Seti League (http://www.setileague.org/) advocate lots of smaller dishes. Their argument is that while an Arecibo size dish can look further, this comes at the cost of seeing a smaller area of the sky. Their favourite statistic is 'even if we're looking on the right frequency at the right time, there's a 99.999% chance that when the call comes in, we'll be looking the wrong way'.
Of course, they're talking about radio waves, but the same argument holds for optical SETI.
> wouldn't we have to depend on the fact that
:)
> the other civilization know that we are right
> here, and that we are able to pick up their
> signals?
Yes, that's true if we assume they're trying to contact US specifically. If they've just got a huge laser on the top of their local Everest-sized mountain & are relying on their planet's rotation to turn it into a beacon we have a better chance of spotting it.
If we try to pick up radio we can (in theory) spot their TV signals, satellite communications & Star Wars ABM radars
> No matter what kind of transmission ET is using
> he will have to hope that we are able to pick
> up the signals
Of course - and that's why the Seti League (http://www.setileague.org/) advocate lots of smaller dishes. Their argument is that while an Arecibo size dish can look further, this comes at the cost of seeing a smaller area of the sky. Their favourite statistic is 'even if we're looking on the right frequency at the right time, there's a 99.999% chance that when the call comes in, we'll be looking the wrong way'.
Of course, they're talking about radio waves, but the same argument holds for optical SETI.
Mark
Keeper of the Wedding Shenanigans Home Page
Liked this comment? Why not buy me something nice