Slashdot Mirror


A Pill To Stop Female Menstruation

skinney writes: "Preliminary findings now suggest that it may be possible in the near future to reversibly suppress menstruation using new progestin antagonists, a class of drugs that includes the controversial abortion pill RU-486." If these pills make it to human trials and then to market, I wonder how much longer it would take for them to become over-the-counter.

16 of 43 comments (clear)

  1. fp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

    I got my first period today!

    Now point me to the drugs and make it my last!

  2. Re:Used as a lifestyle choice, this worries me. by tzanger · · Score: 2

    Frankly, I'd like to see some more work on developing birth control for men.

    Actually, researchers at the University of Newfoundland have come up with a birth control pill for men. The odd thing about this pill is that it isn't taken orally; you put it in the heel of your shoe.

    It works by making you limp.

    <rim shot>

  3. Re:argh by Sloppy · · Score: 2

    Hasn't anyone stopped to think that menstruation is a normal, cleansing part of a woman's cycle? So lame that it's seen as nothing more than an inconvenience.

    Some peoples' value system contains factors that go beyond just whatever happens to be "normal" or "natural." If your idea of a good life is to spend 12 hours a day hunting and gathering food, and having a child once per year in order to just barely counter the death rate, then by all means, do that. But the rest of us would rather enjoy life, and technological progress is what makes this possible.

    I realize some religeons think that certain mundane details of how life is supposed to work, are handed down by God and should be conformed to. But making it up as we go, and hacking those processes to work the way we want them instead of how they're pre-programmed, is getting pretty popular.

    Fuck the manufacturer's ROMs, I'll write my own. Said the meme to the gene, "We will bury you!"


    ---
    --
    As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
  4. Re:Blame it on American roots by bungalow · · Score: 2

    The Jewish opinion on menstruation has always been that it is natural but unclean thing. Women who were in the throes of it were to be sent to the "Women's House" out back and locked in there until they were no longer unclean. Men who cavorted with an unclean woman would also become unclean and would need to go to the Temple to become cleansed.

    To put this in a little more context (Book of Levidicus) Skin flaws of most sorts (lesions, rashes) were also unclean,(Lev 13:7-9;Lev 13:13-15) as well as rabbits (anything that walks on paws; Lev 11:27) and mildew (Lev 13:50-52) and nocternal emissions (lev 15:1-3;15-17).

    This is not to say that women are as vile as bugs, but that a number of things made a number of people unclean according to the laws written in the books of Moses.

  5. How much nature can we screw with? by zpengo · · Score: 2

    This brings up a question that is more scientific than moral/ethical, regardless of how it sounds: How much can we self-engineer ourselves before becoming an unstable system?

    --


    Got Rhinos?
  6. If it quacks like a duck... by Galvatron · · Score: 2
    Why do people regard it as a mere inconvenience? Well, it's messy, it's inconvenient, and it makes life miserable for everyone involved. Why should we regard it as a good thing? See my above post, women are not supposed to be getting 12 periods a year, for years at a time. They're supposed to get maybe a couple, then get pregnant for 9 months, give birth, have a couple more periods, then get pregant again, until menopause or death (the latter probably from childbirth).

    Calling menstruation a "normal, cleansing part of a woman's cycle," is utter bullshit, and has only been normal since the advent of modern birth control.
    The only "intuitive" interface is the nipple. After that, it's all learned.

    --
    "The question of whether a computer can think is no more interesting than that of whether a submarine can swim" -EWD
    1. Re:If it quacks like a duck... by Galvatron · · Score: 2
      There's also plenty of literature about how hormonal treatments such as the pill lead to an increased cancer risk.

      Yes, from pills sold prior to 1979, when dosages were orders of magnitude higher (like taking RU-486 every day). Since then, there has been no evidence whatsoever of increased cancer risk.

      First, when something that naturally occurs in the body (when things are working NORMALLY) is seen as inconvenient, it really should make one question the adopted framework/society that would MAKE it inconvenient.

      Okay bright guy, how do we change society so that painful cramps, bloating, and violent mood swings are not inconvenient?

      I don't even know what to say about "messy" - sounds like a hangup.

      *scratches head* Um, no. I happily go down on my girlfriend during her period, it doesn't bother me in the slightest. However, the fluids leaking from between her legs during her period are sticky and stain things red. That qualifies as "messy" in my book.

      Finally, as for Ms. Christine Northrup, let me leave you with a quote from her website: "Her pioneering work has shown that conditions such as PMS, endometriosis, breast symptoms, and uterine conditions are the language through which women's bodies speak of wounding they have experienced in a culture which has been unsupportive to women and to those values we call 'womanly.'"

      The only "intuitive" interface is the nipple. After that, it's all learned.

      --
      "The question of whether a computer can think is no more interesting than that of whether a submarine can swim" -EWD
    2. Re:If it quacks like a duck... by tunesmith · · Score: 2
      I have strong doubts about studies that say constant menstruation is a big "unnatural" health problem when I know there are plenty of other medical experts and gynecologists that profess otherwise (Christine Northrup for one), and would probably take offense at it being called utter bullshit. There's also plenty of literature about how hormonal treatments such as the pill lead to an increased cancer risk. My girlfriend won't go anywhere near the stuff.

      And, inconvenient and messy? First, when something that naturally occurs in the body (when things are working NORMALLY) is seen as inconvenient, it really should make one question the adopted framework/society that would MAKE it inconvenient. There's a bigger disconnect here than the matter of women's bodies not "behaving appropriately", so to speak. I don't even know what to say about "messy" - sounds like a hangup. Now, I'm only referring to things such as timing, flow, and to a degree, emotional sensitivity. I agree that there can be other symptoms that really are debilitating (including the degree of emotional sensitivity), but more often than not those are the product of other health imbalances.

      tune

      --
      skkkoooonnnggggkkk ptui
  7. Not so new, really by Galvatron · · Score: 4
    In addition to RU-486, the same chemicals are in your run-of-the-mill birth control pills. In fact, you can get the same effect as RU-486 by taking a bunch of birth control pills at once. Don't know the dosages exactly, but I'm sure it's not too tough to find out.

    Anyway, my girlfriend already prevents menstruation by just taking the pill month-round. Ordinarily, one week of the pill is just a sugar pill, but if you instead take the full strength pills the whole month, you can prevent menstruation. My guess is, this is more or less the same idea.

    A couple notes for those of you who want to try this at home: first, yes, it is considered safe. My girlfriend has discussed it with doctors, and originally read about it in a medical article (her father's an ER doctor). In fact, girls really shouldn't be menstruating all the time. Up until a century ago, women would basically spend half their time pregnant from puberty to menopause (or until they died in child birth), so what's going on now is pretty unnatural.

    Second, make sure you have full strength pills. Many pills have stepped dosages, so only one week would actually be full strength, two weeks would be partial strength, and one week is just a placebo. You need the ones with 3 constant dosage weeks, and one placebo week. Just toss out the placebo week and keep taking the regular pills.

    Third, 9 weeks seems to be the limit for my girlfriend. After going through 3 sets of pills, even if she continues taking full strength pills, she goes into menstruation. YMMV, but this is probably not something you can do forever.

    The only "intuitive" interface is the nipple. After that, it's all learned.

    --
    "The question of whether a computer can think is no more interesting than that of whether a submarine can swim" -EWD
    1. Re:Not so new, really by The+Devil's+Avocado · · Score: 2

      A VERY important thing to note, though, is that taking birth control pills all the time to control menstruation greatly increases the likelihood of pregnancy. Also, taking full dose all the time is not at all a good idea for most women- women have periods to flush out the uterine lining. You are simply wrong- girls very much should be menstruating every month. Additionally, it's a good indication to know if you're pregnant. If one is always taking full-strength pills, then one may become pregnant without knowing it because of not noticing skipped periods. This can cause extremely serious damage to the fetus. As always with something like this, CONSULT YOUR DOCTOR before trying anything. Seriously screwing up your reproductive system is not something most people want to do.

      --
      "He may look like an idiot and talk like an idiot but don't let that fool you. He really is an idiot." -Groucho Marx
  8. argh by tunesmith · · Score: 3
    Hasn't anyone stopped to think that menstruation is a normal, cleansing part of a woman's cycle? So lame that it's seen as nothing more than an inconvenience. In older spiritualities, pagan, native american, etc, menstruation was seen as sacred and a way for women to connect with their inner selves. It's sad that it as seen as nothing more than an inconvenience now.

    I can understand "exceptions" where some women's systems make menstruation some sort of risk, but this is obviously going to be marketed to all women in some sort of floaty commercial with muted pastel colors exhorting women to exercise their newfound FREEDOM...

    tune

    --
    skkkoooonnnggggkkk ptui
    1. Re:argh by RhetoricalQuestion · · Score: 2

      In older spiritualities, pagan, native american, etc, menstruation was seen as sacred and a way for women to connect with their inner selves. It's sad that it as seen as nothing more than an inconvenience now.

      I agree with you in that I feel that the older spiritualities did much more to celebrate womanhood as a whole. Part of this often inculded a culture around menstruation.

      But celebrating menstruation alone is not the same as celebrating womanhood.

      I'm much more concerned that modern cultures don't respect (let alone celebrate) my thoughts, my feelings, my view of the world, my approach to problem solving, the complexities of my relationships with others, my desires, etc. Celebrating my period is low on my list of priorities.

      My inner self and I do connect regularly, but I don't need to be on my period to do so. I meditate. Or I write. Or I talk to people about what I think the real differences are between men and women, and it turn learn more about myself as a woman.

      Now a little more respect for menstruation and its associated problems would be nice. Like when friends of mine are so overcome with the pain of severe menstrual cramps that they can't move, reactions like "it can't be that bad." are rather demeaning. Being able to talk about this openly in mixed company without all the men covering their ears and saying "Too much information." would be a real step forward.

      I have no problem with women who choose to stop having their periods -- I don't really want to have mine. Just because I'm a woman doesn't mean I have to enjoy my backaches, my painful bloating, my inability to rely on my emotions for a week (I'm usually very down to earth, but while PMS'ing I cry easily -- which can be very problematic at work), my frequent urination, etc., -- and I have mild symptons. I can celebrate being female in general, without celebrating this particular aspect of my biology.

      There's a very big difference between using means to stop having periods, and treating menstruation as this dark, embarrassing, secret, shameful thing that we aren't supposed to let anyone be aware of, except in whispered euphemisms. This is a normal thing, but yet it is not talked about as one -- and I don't see a desire to desire to stop something normal as being inconsistant with wanting to discuss it normally. Ovulation is a normal thing, but birth constrol stops this -- and birth control is increasingly being discussed normally.

      Natural part of life? Of course it is. Now please treat it like one.

      --

      I can spell. I just can't type.

  9. Sure-fire method of birth control by DamienMcKenna · · Score: 2

    Here's a method that has always worked for my wife and I: the easiest way to prevent unwanted pregnancy is to force your girlfriend/wife to watch at least one episode of Southpark, and after that you won't see her for a week. Continued long enough this can avoid all the normal problems associated with failed birth control, eg pickle-jam sandwiches and offspring dropping out of school.

  10. not enough females by sulli · · Score: 2
    in the audience.

    Perhaps there could be a "Females" topic? (It is relevant to geeks, no?) Of course, Taco would probably come up with a dumbass logo, and then there goes the audience even further.

    Except Anne Marie, of course.

    --

    sulli
    RTFJ.
  11. Re:Uh... by DarkEdgeX · · Score: 2

    It's really too bad I can't use my mod points on this (yeah, I know why).. someone should mod this up if they see it; +1 Funny. =)

    --
    All I know about Bush is I had a good job when Clinton was president.
  12. Used as a lifestyle choice, this worries me. by RhetoricalQuestion · · Score: 3

    Regarding both forms of this drug:

    Many existing forms of hormonal birth control stop or greatly reduce menstruation (and its lovely side-effects) already. The Pill is often used on women who have severe cramps, and usually greatly reduces flow. (It's been described as going from a gush to a drizzle.) Similarly, Depo-Provara (the Shot -- a needle every 3 months) has a very common side-effect of stopping menstruation completely. While both of these have problems associated with long-term use, this article doesn't tell me what I'd really like to know -- how is this better than my current choices?

    The stopping menstruation without stopping ovulation does sound interesting, but I have to wonder about its side-effects. Without the build-up in the uterus, couldn't this lead to more ectopic pregnancies? And if you were to become pregnant while on this drug, how would you know? (It's very dangerous, for example, to take birth control pills while pregnant.) And couldn't the continued use of this drug while pregnant have adverse side-effects?

    I applaud their goal of trying to reduce endometriosis and the number of hysterectomies performed (both my mother and my mother-in-law underwent this) but I worry about this as a lifestyle choice.

    Frankly, I'd like to see some more work on developing birth control for men. My SO and I don't want children. Unfortunately, I'm terrible at doing things on a schedule. I was on the pill -- but after a few months I started forgetting to take them so often that it became useless. I can barely remember to get my oil changed every 3 months, let alone get a shot -- and I hate doctors anyway. And the Norplant (implant which provides birth control for 5 years) has some extremely adverse side-effects. (Most women experience CONSTANT bleeding.) My SO, however, is much more organized; I'd trust him to take a pill every day over me. Unfortunately, there's nothing available.

    Thinking back to my single life, though, I don't think I'd ever be able to trust any guy who said "Relax babe -- I'm on the pill"

    --

    I can spell. I just can't type.