Ricochet Modems == Wireless LAN?
dpease writes: "Metricom, purveyor of Ricochet wireless networking, died today. I understand that, sans infrastructure, a Ricochet wireless modem can call another Ricochet modem, and that modem-to-modem range is nearly a mile. Is the hardware this company leaves behind a viable solution for a really cool, really cheap wireless LAN?"
I am not an apologist for Slashdot censorship, out of band editorial moderation, "bitchslapping" by editorial staff, et all. Because /. editors don't need public defense, they OWN the fucking site! You don't like it, go troll somewhere else. Your little perl script amounts to a denial of service attack and as such is ILLEGAL. You don't have the right to shut down a popular web forum simply because you don't agree with decisions made by the editorial board. If you don't like it, go download slashcode or scoop and start your own fucking site. Script kiddies like you maybe ought to see the inside of a jail once or twice to straighten out your sense of proportion when it comes to injustice.
--Maynard
you stupid ass dickhead.... If you don't like the site, don't go to the site fuckhead!
Get a life you little dweeb!
shove your head up that asshole and shut up
It is not viable because it is not supported by linux. This is a Windows only product and it should die like BSD. Lniux is the only way. But Mandrake is cool whereas on the other hand RedHat sucks. RedHat used to be cool but then they sold out to the Almighty Buck. RedHat began to suck after that at the first opportunity. Mac's suck too but Amigas are cool. And even though Mac's suck the Apple][ rocked all over the pansy ass of the Trash80. The Timex Sinclare really sucked balls and assorted nuts. If it had a 6502 or, better yet, a 6809 in it instead of that Z80 piece of shit corn, then, of course, it would not have sucked one ounce of nut.