Analysis of Passport Flaws
An anonymous reader sent us an excellent (and technical) paper describing problems with Passport its not lame anti ms rhetoric, its actually a well written technical assesment of security problems with the unified login that passport aims to achieve. This is a good read.
"its not lame anti ms rhetoric" /. *ARE* "lame anti ms rhetoric"?
/. editors managed to fit in about 3 mistakes in 6 words?!?
Is this supposed to suggest that other MS articles that are posted to
Oh yeah, and where the hell is the punctuation? Shouldn't it read "it's not lame, anti-MS rhetoric"?
I mean... thats 6 words... and somehow
/. isn't exactly renowned for it's editing, but this seems to be a new low.
The post also has nothing to do with the article, we're given very little info. Of course, now I know its not lame and that its "a good read", but I kinda expect that would be why it's posted.