Brain vs. Computer: Place Your Bets
dev_null_ziggy writes: "CNN reports that the current chess guru is going up against a supercomputer, amusingly titled 'Deep Fritz.' The match is scheduled for October, and the current champion, Vladimir Kramnik, stands to win $1 Million dollars if he wins. Of course, since he'll be snagging $800k for a draw, and $600k for a loss ... I'll give two to one odds on the machine."
The same uninformed nonsense again.
>Deep Blue wasn't a very good chess program,
>compared to other programs like Fritz, however it
>had a lot of power
Do you have any EVIDENCE that Fritz is a better
chessprogram than Deep Blue, speed not included?
(You don't, because it's false. Also Deep Blue
made specific tradeoffs based on its speed. And
they could include all the knowledge they wanted
without a speed penalty because they had hardware
to play with. Fritz can't do that, and hence
it has to make compromises and stay dumber)
>And it had something else, it was designed
>completely to counter Kasparov's style, against
>any other opponent it would have played much
>weaker.
Do you have any EVIDENCE to support that?
Kasparov claimed this, but there is no reason
to believe it's true. He claimed a human made
several of the moves in the games as well.
--
GCP