Slashdot Mirror


Don't Forget That Worms Happen Everywhere

friday2k writes "Securityfocus has a nice column on Worms and their origin in 1988. It explains what everybody should never forget. We have dealt with *NIX worms (Sadmind, li0n, ...) and they will come back again. Maybe then the MS fanatics will laugh and say: didn't we always tell you Open Source is insecure (too?) ..."

7 of 391 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Don't for get that they are released under GPL by Have+Blue · · Score: 3, Funny

    And don't forget that the GPL is evil, and any program you write with it is like a virus. Hey, wait a minute.. :P

  2. Don't forget Morris! by HiredMan · · Score: 5, Funny
    On November 2, 1988 the "Morris Worm" was unleashed on the net. It jumped from college to college (that was most of the net then) and, because of a bug in the code, would reproduce itself within the machine until it ran the machine into the ground as it tried to infect others.


    Imagine Code Red in which almost all servers are NT/IIS and there is no web, no central authority, no "experts"...
    It caused the Inet as it was to cease to function. People had to pull their boxes off-line to keep from getting repeatedly infected.


    The confusion and panic that followed lead to the creation of CNet and was the start of most of the big, early Inet security organizations that exist today.


    <old codger>
    You young whippersnappers don't know from worms. We used to create worms on punch cards and you had to mail them around to get infected! Those were the days!
    </old codger>


    I suddenly feel old and have to go lie down....


    =tkk

  3. If that happens... by SpanishInquisition · · Score: 5, Funny
    We just have to claim that Linux worms :
    • are faster
    • are more portable
    • use less ressources
    • can be more easily modified since you have access to the source
    • Aren't tied to a single vendor


    That should make the point of the superiority of Linux worms over Windows worms and end all the FUD.

    --
    Je t'aime Stéphanie
  4. Code Red by briggsb · · Score: 5, Funny

    Talked about his experience as a worm. In the interview here. It has some advice for newer worms and viruses.

  5. Sendmail? Elegant? Minimalistic? by alispguru · · Score: 5, Funny
    In the long run, elegant, minimalistic code is easier to understand, and therefore easier to secure (examples are Sendmail vs. qmail, or BIND vs. djbdns).
    That's the first (and hopefully only) time I ever hope to see the words "elegant", "minimalistic", and "Sendmail" together in the same sentence.
    --

    To a Lisp hacker, XML is S-expressions in drag.
  6. Any day now... by why-is-it · · Score: 3, Funny

    Right now there aren't any non-proof-of-concept Linux viruses.

    I can just see it:

    Hi! How are you?
    I send you this perl script that must be run as root in order to have your advice
    See you later. Thanks

    --
    *** Where are we going? And what's with this handbasket?
  7. HEY! by Psmylie · · Score: 3, Funny
    I resemble that remark!

    err...

    --

    psmylie's dictionary: Godzillion (noun) Any number large enough to destroy Tokyo