Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

IBM's Purple Book and Open Source

Posted by ryuzaki0 on from the faint-praise dept.

Bill Kendrick writes: "I noticed a ZDNet article titled "Why we should hail IBM's ode to open source--the Purple Book". It compares IBM's open release of the classic PC's hardware and BIOS specifications with today's OpenSource model and Linux." Shortly after IBM's open-spec PC, they reverted to the closed PS/2 with a patented bus in an attempt to monopolize the exploding market. Hopefully this particular bit of history won't replay itself.

1 of 140 comments (clear)

  1. I still say IBM should do a Linux distro by PRR · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Yes, I realize IBM has said that they won't do their own distro... but I still think they should.

    One of the biggest reasons for the success of the PC was not just the openess, but because the IBM brand name was something that provided a bit more confidence for "the corporate suits" to adopt... an image which Apple and Radio Shack didn't quite have then... and most distros don't quite have right now.

    IBM should probably buy an existing distro like Redhat in addition to the multi-distro support they're already doing. Thanks to the GPL, all of their developments for their own distro will still be available to other distros who will in turn refine IBM's developments, and so on.