The UDRP: Is It Un-Fair.com?
typecast writes "A study of more than 3,000 UDRP decisions by a Canadian law prof. suggests that ICANN's domain-dispute resolution process may be even more unfair than Slashdot types already believe. This article says the study confirms organizations such as WIPO and the National Arbitration Forum decide most cases in favor of trademark holders. But it also says it's clear that individual arbitrators with strong "anti-cybersquatting" records are the ones most likely to be handed UDRP cases. A copy of the study and a minimal database of UDRP-panelist stats can be found at Geist's own UDRPInfo Web site."
I think that I remember reading something like this on a couple of other websites... There was a study done about people cybersquatting and being misdirected to sites that they really did NOT want to go to... Like the old whitehouse.com trick... Let me see if I can find it...
I've had this account for a couple years, and have gotten tired of it. It's not at all hard to karma whore yourself up until you're at the +1 level (just write anything pro-linux and have links to back them up) and get yourself up to a default of 2, then start trolling away.
The moderators catch on eventually, but who cares? It's all about fucking with the geeks.
I should change my .sig before I get bitchslapped too hard... I've already dropped 10 hard-whored karma points today, so I should stop soon...
Wow, I sure like the new Slashcode... it allows us to easily separate interesting, informative links [scientificamerican.com] from complete trash. Cool.
--
I like to watch.
Go ahead and block all you want. We'll just link to mirrors of those sites. Bwwahahahaha!
"The problem with the French is that they don't have a word for 'entrepeneur'." -George W. Bush