Make Your Own DSL
Logic Bomb writes: "Robert Cringley's latest is a striking set of instructions on how to create your own DSL service, or even your own "socialist Internet Service Provider". A cookie goes to whomever manages to implement this first! :-D" Cringley is on a roll.
You're kinda missing the whole if you think this article offers any useful information. Broadband without access to the internet is somewhat less than useful for the majority of people. And having DSL between me and Jimmy down the block doesn't do much good when it's just slamming into my 56k modem to get to the "internet".
It is SDSL technology. And to learn more, I would check out "DSL for Dummies," which is actually a decent book. I worked in Network Ops for a year or so at a national DSL provider, and you'd be surprised how many of our engineers had a copy of that one. :-)
Comment removed based on user account deletion
Funny, I thought the 'dry pair' stuff was the boring part of the article. I happen to be in telecom and that's all a no-brainer.
;)
What was fascinating was the potential (admittedly) limited uses for roll-your-own DSL. Read the Lariat homepage - what an amazing project for a small town!
I think the main points of the article are:
1) There are lots of last-mile solutions, and they don't all have to come from your ILEC.
2) Innovative uses of these solutions can have come really cool results - like Lariat, like paying for only one broadband connection, like establishing a neighbourhood network then networking these networks... makes you think
The companies can tell you they don't offer the service, but sometimes they will be lying (as Cringley notes).
Telcos are regulated. Unlike a regular corporation they can't just stop offering a service that they don't like. They can just neglect to train their staff in it and hope eveyone forgets about it.
But if you push them they have to comply. The services that Verison can offer in New York is specified by the tariff in that state, and it's state law. There are some really nit-picky regulations (down to standards for signal strengh and placement of network interfaces in apartment buildings). In exchange for all these budensome regulations Verison gets a monopoly on New York state phone service for all intents and purposes.
The Public Service Commission is the state body in New York that oversees this, using both carrot (deregulation) and stick (fines) to motivate Verison. In my experience, Verison-people CARE about getting in trouble with the PSC, and more people should know that. The evaluation of managers at all levels includes a measure of PSC complaints.
So if the phone company denies you your "burgler alarm" check with your state's equivalent regulatory body to see if you are being lied to. (You may also want to do research on the actual tariff itself to see if it's still on the books where you live.)
I used to work for a local phone company (ILEC). We realized that one of the ISP's in town was ordering alarm circuits and using them for ADSL, effectively bypassing us. How did the phone company respond? By adding load coils to ALL alarm circuits. It still met the tariffs, and worked fine as alarm circuits, but no longer worked for ADSL at all. Sneaky, but effective.
On a separate note, I think phone companies charge far too much for T1 service (point-to-point), and there should be reasonable tariffs for dry copper lines. Phone companies don't want to lose their monopolies on high-speed data, though -- it's very profitable. Lobby your state's public utilities commission. They're the ones who ultimately decide these things...