Sendmail On IBM Mainframes Running GNU/Linux
raffe writes: "Cnet reports that Sendmail has released a version of its e-mail server software that can run on Linux-powered IBM mainframe computers. In one benchmark test, IBM found that it was possible to house 2 million e-mail accounts on a single server, with 10 percent of the users accessing their mail at any given moment" For some reason though, IBM zSeries machines aren't listed at pricewatch ;)
Somebody moderate this karma whoring, first post baiting, mail munging qmail zealot down where he belongs!
As the sun rises of God's country, a lone troll climbs from his cave to the top of the ridge, thumps his chest and yowls:
FIRSTUS POSTUS, BEEOTCHII!!!!
pleeease?!!!!
_,-%/%|
_,-' \//%\
_,-' \%/|%
_,-' __,--
_,-' _,-'%(% ; %)%
_,-' _,-' %\%, %\
_,-' _,-' '--%'
_,-' _,-'
_,-' _,-'
_,-' _,-'
_,-' _,-'
_,-' _,-'
_,-' _,-'
_,-' _,-'
/ / ) _,-'
\__/_,-'
SUCK IT.
Important Stuff:
But, but, but, qmail doesn't have the "instant" root exploit (or any other exploit) like sendmail does. How are local users suppose to "get root"?
P.S. I'm a qmail admin. I sleep at night.
I just can't help it. I tried but damn it I just keep on shocking the monkey. What should I do?
What the fuck are you talking about? Sendmail's last exploit was a looong time ago. Post a recent or current link, or shut your cocksucking lying mouth, faggot!
its not GNU/Linux , you stupid jerk, its
ll llllllll ll lll l l xxx xxx
lll llllll llll ll lll lll xxx xxx
lll ll lllll ll lll lll xxx xxx
lll ll lll ll ll lll lll xxxxx
lll ll lll lll ll lll lll xxx
lll ll lll lllll lll lll xxxxx
llllllll llllll lll lllll llll llll xxx xxx
llllllll llllllll ll llll lllllllll xxx xxx
ll llllllll ll lll l l xxx xxx
lll llllll llll ll lll lll xxx xxx
lll ll lllll ll lll lll xxxxxx
lll ll lll ll ll lll lll xxx
lll ll lll lll ll lll lll xxx
lll ll lll lllll lll lll xxx xxx
llllllll llllll lll lllll llll llll xxx xxx
llllllll llllllll ll llll lllllllll xxx xxx
Timothy, go suck it !
but sendmail was built by chinks. who wants to use the evil creation of filthy commies?
___....---"""".
." ". S \
/ \ e i
i i i
i__ _ i n i
" "\\ i i
|| i d i
__.// i _ . - "i
\ i- " i
i ii m i
\ / i i
"._.--"i a i
i i
i i i
i _i
i l _.-"
i _.-"
i-"
get bizy, yo
___....---"""".
." ". S \
/ \ e i
i i i
i__ _ i n i
" "\\ i i
|| i d i
__.// i _ . - "i
\ i- " i
i ii m i
\ / i i
"._.--"i a i
i i
i i i
i _i
i l _.-"
i _.-"
i-"
Shut the fuck up, you racist fuck!
Nice pasty white skin on yah, faggot. (The "Superior" race, indeed. bwahahah!)
pacman doesn't have a tail!
Guess your to dump to read bugtraq on security focus.
Quit yo yak'n and get to smack'n!
Biznatch!
its super pacman, dumbass.
Maybe I've been smoking too much crack, but I though CmdrTaco stated one short week ago that Linux should not be referred to as GNU/Linux?
.8 => [30,44],
.5 => [45,99],
.4 => [100,199],
.3 => [200,299],
.2 => [300,399],
.1 => [400,1000000],
Fuck the lameness filter, here's something really lame, courtesey of Slash:
# interpolative hash ref. Got these figures by testing out
# several paragraphs of text and saw how each compressed
# the key is the ratio it should compress, the array lower,upper
# for the ratio. These ratios are _very_ conservative
# a comment has to be absolute shit to trip this off
if (!$bad) {
my $limits = {
1.3 => [10,19],
1.1 => [20,29],
};
# Ok, one list ditch effort to skew out the trolls!
if (length($$comm) >= 10) {
for (keys %$limits) {
# DEBUG
# print "ratio $_ lower $limits->{$_}->[0] upper $limits->{$_}->[1]<br>\n";
# if it's within lower to upper
if (length($$comm) >= $limits->{$_}->[0] &&
length($$comm) <= $limits->{$_}->[1]) {
# if is >= the ratio, then it's most likely a
# troll comment
if ((length(compress($$comm)) /
length($$comm)) <= $_) {
# blammo luser
$$error_message = slashDisplay('errors', {
type => 'compress filter',
ratio => $_,
}, 1);
editComment('', $$error_message), return unless $preview;
$bad = 1;
last;
}
}
}
}
}
Conformity is the jailer of freedom and enemy of growth. -JFK
Timothy, you pushover!
"And like that