Pentium IV Hits 2 Ghz

A number of people wrote in with the news that Intel released the 2 Ghz chip. The Tech-Report article points out a couple interesting meta-ideas - this is Intel's chance to retake the performance crown from AMD, as well as being one of those round numbers that makes people feel warm and fuzzy. I'm sure there's going to be gobs of benchmarks today - post 'em in the comments as you find 'em.

Comments

fuck you

[Anonymous Coward]

he loves to probe Tux's back door.

+---------+ .MMvMMMM.
| ,.. | MF_ _ MMM.
|`M,M"M"M | |/ \_/ \_"MM
| "M,M,M | |\_/ \_/ "\|
|`M,M"M"M | | ( \/|
| "M,M,M | : /
|`M,M" "M | \`-._.-' /
| " | ,`-._.--"\
|WindowsXP| / / \ ) )
+---------+ / /| \ / / /
/\,MMM,-./ /
.MMMMM. ,MMMMMM> / \
MMMMM-MM.MMMM MMM\/\/M /
MM-M(o)MMMMMMM MMMMMMM |
M(o)."|\MMMMMMM MMMMMM |
`MM___+/MMMMMM MMMMMMM |
`MM\/MMMMMMMMMMMMMMM' \
`MMM MMM MMMM MMMM' |
`M\-'MMMMM MMMMM' \_/
,MM',MM' /_ _\
,MM',MM' \/
"' MM'

Important stuff:

• Try to keep posts on topic.
• Try to reply to other people comments instead of starting new threads.
• Read other people's messages before posting your own to avoid simply duplicating what has already been said.
• Use a clear subject that describes what your message is about.
• Offtopic, Inflammatory, Inappropriate, Illegal, or Offensive comments might be moderated. (You can read everything, even moderated posts, by adjusting your threshold on the User Preferences Page)

Problems regarding accounts or comment posting should be sent to CowboyNeal.

michael

[Anonymous Coward]

/ \
|\_/|
|---|
| |
| |
_ |=-=| _
_ / \| |/ \
/ \| | | ||\
| | | | | \>
| | | | | \
| - - - - |) )
| /
\ /
\ /
\ /
\ /
| |

oooooo oo oo ooooo oo oo oo oo ooooo oo oo oo
oo oo oo oo oo oo oo oo oo oo oo oo oo oo
oooo oo oo oo oooo oooooo oo oo oo oo oo
oo oo oo oo oo oo oo oo oo oo oo oo
oo ooooo ooooo oo oo oo ooooo ooooo oo

What did you expect?

[The Ultimate Badass]

Once again, the company with the most resources, experience, and capital has secured their lead. Did you really think AMD was capable of competing?

I'm afraid it's time for all the AMD fanatics to admit that the story of David and Goliath simply doesn't apply to the corporate technology world. The biggest will always win, if only because they are more capable of supporting their management bloat problem. Look at IBM vs. DEC. DEC has suffered a two decade long slow death, from being the most beloved and innovative minicomputer manufacturer, to being an unwanted subsidiary of a PC manufacturer, to finally being eliminated. AMD is heading for the same chopping block.

The key to understanding the difference between intel and AMD, is to realise that intel doesn't have to run flat out all the time to put the best chip on the market. They're big enough to coast, and take a break sometimes. AMD needs every minute of developer time they can get just to keep up! Sooner or later, AMD just exhausts it's resources and slips back into the low-end slot, where it belongs. Also remember, intel can weather a lot more damage to their markets than AMD. AMD doesn't have much of a war chest.

My advice to everyone here is to realise that there are no prizes given for rooting for the underdog. It doesn't benefit you if AMD "wins", and you shouldn't even be thinking in those terms. While the intel architecture dominates the low-end computing market, intel will be the market leader. Accept it, or mourn it. You can't change it by wishing.

Re:Yeah, but what good does 2 Ghz do...

[Anonymous Coward]

Given that you don't understand the difference between latency and throughput, perhaps it would be wise to remain silent? Just a thought.