Slashdot Mirror


A PVR For Two Straight Weeks Of Video

Rob G. writes: "Story from Variety on Y! News this morning about a monster PVR that can store 320 hours of tv; price is $1999. You could tape full seasons of a dozen shows and watch 'em in the summer instead of BB2." There are some other cool features promised here, including free programming service for broadband users. Watch the hard-drive wars heat up on PVRs and smile at what that means for your time-shifting habits.

6 of 225 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Eliminate ads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Here's an interesting thing to consider. The various network execs are claiming that no matter what Replay does to detect commercials during a broadcast (i.e. the markers embedded in the signal), the networks will be able to get around this. From the article:
    For example, some officials believe the networks will be able to outwit Replay's anti-commercial device.

    ``There is no scheme to differentiate between programs and commercials that is not defeatable,'' one senior network exec said.

    This strongly implies that no matter what the recorder does, engineers at the networks will be able to reverse-engineer it and modify their codes.

    The question is, what happens if Replay wraps the firmware within their box with a thin layer of encryption? Trying to get around that would almost certainly run afoul of the DMCA, no?

  2. Sounds great... Take notice, TiVo! by AtariDatacenter · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Well, they're looking to fill the market that TiVo is refusing to touch... that is, the transfer of programs between TiVo units. And if it is able to transfer video, you can almost bet that it has an ethernet connector, and doesn't just do it over dialup. Good for them. Competition is going to make the PVR market better.

    Regarding the 320 hours, that's going to be in low quality. I'm assuming that the ReplayTV has a two-drive limit. Either they are banking on future technology (2 x 128gb drives) or some additional compression, or both. (Additional compression is still possible, using existing methods. Anyone remember the TiVo bug where vertical resolution was lost, but was only noticable on SVideo units?)

    In any case, I'm glad they're taking a stand on the sharing issue. That alone might be enough to make me switch.

  3. security by British · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Has something like this been used to record security camera footage, for archival purposes? Sounds like it would be perfect for that.

  4. Re:Homebrew PVR by mosch · · Score: 3, Interesting
    yeah, assuming of course that you want really awful picture quality compared to what these dedicated PVRs put out.

    Try examining the output of Hauppauge->VGA->NTSC sometime and compare it to what you get out of a TiVo. It's like comparing apples to horseshit.

  5. Re:Only one barrier left to Full TV Viewing Pleasu by Zaknafein500 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Why is it that as TV viewing technology gets better, TV seems to be getting worse?

    You obviously don't own a TiVo. You would be amazed, there is actually good stuff on TV. TiVo makes it much easier to sift through the garbage and locate the gems. I know my TV watching has gone up drastically since getting my TiVo, and I'm actually watching stuff that I LIKE.

    --

    "The guide is definitive, reality is frequently inaccurate."
  6. If you think SPAM is bad now ... by Ldir · · Score: 2, Interesting
    ... and send programs by email to other DVRs.

    Boy, if you hate SPAM now, I can just see it: come home from work, plop down in the recliner, and fire up the ol' mega-PVR.

    "You have mail! Downloading message 1 of 73 ..."

    Two hours later (after everyone in the neighborhood complains about using all their cable bandwidth), you find that the helpful folks with the "FREE PAGERS" have sent you 12 identical infomercials, several fly-by-night lenders sent feature films showing how they can refinance your [mortgage|debt], you have 17 MLM videos that all begin with, "This is NOT an MLM", and a dozen pr0n companies have sent you samples of their latest films (OK, so it's not all bad news).

    Meanwhile, Aunt Emma sent the latest home videos forwarded and re-forwarded from distant relatives you've never met ("Here's Johnny Applesmith's complete graduation ceremony. You can see him at about 2:50. Johnny is my neighbor's second cousin-in-law on his uncle's side, twice removed."), Uncle Joe sent a Norton infomercial (fowarded from a friend, etc.) that he wants you to see "RIGHT NOW" because of that "Good Times AV Virus" he heard about (acutally shreds your PVR drive into its component electrons, then melts everything in your freezer, or so he heard from his buddy Tom), and half-a-dozen old friends with way too much time on their hands forward all the latest compilations of stand-up routines snatched from Comedy Central (and each other, over and over again).

    Two thoughts:

    1. We're going to have to get a bigger Internet.

    2. Time to dig out my library card.

    (Come to think of it, the pr0n by itself would consume every Hz of available bandwidth. Death of the Intermet, film at 11!)

    Technology can be a wonderful thing. Just keep it away from Marketing.