Trident Micro Update
grendelkhan writes: "According to Linux Today, Trident is denying that they are no longer supporting open source developers for XFree86." This message from Eich clarifies the events leading up to this. Looks like Trident chips will continue to be supported, one way or another.
Well I went through the process of sending their customer relations department a nice letter.
I calmly informed them if quality drivers for their products ceased to emerge in the marketplace that I would seek other alternatives.
At the time I felt like an informed reader and now I feel like an ass.
"You should always go to other people's funerals; otherwise, they won't come to yours." -- Yogi Berra
From Egbert's linked email:
"Alan Hourihane has tried to obtain documentation for the latest Trident chipsest (CyberBladeXP and CyberBladeXPm) without success. He offered to sign an NDA with 'source code exception clause' a clause which allowed distribution of unobfuscated source developed with the help of documentation otherwise covered by the NDA.
Trident appearantly didn't accept a 'source code exception clause'."
Just being the casual observer that I am, I would question if it is in fact settled. Trident has yet to provide the documentation requested by the XFree86 group in the manner in which it has been received prior to this chipset. All Trident has provided is some PR spin about their "policy" not changing. This is often times done by companies to try and do some damage control.
Until they provide the documentation needed they still need to be pressured.
...just twisted.
You can release the source- and in many situations, you can fix it, so long as the bugs aren't with the interactions with the device. In that case, you need to enter into an NDA with the company to get the data. So long as they're willing to allow people to be involved as they show interest, then there's little problem- otherwise you end up with the joke that NVidia pulled with the Utah-GLX driver support.
It's doable, just nowhere near as useful as releasing everything to let anybody work on it.
I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
I've said this in the last posting of the story, but it was at the bottom so I don't know how many people saw it:
We should have IBM, Micron, or who ever else uses these chips in their laptops to ask Trident to release the documentation that is needed to develop a driver for FreeX.
It's harder to ignore IBM than it is a single developer.
III.IIVIVIXIIVIVIIIVVIIIIXVIIIXIIIIIIIIVIIIIVVIII
If I read all of the above correctly...
Trident's policy has been, and still is, to require an NDA. That NDA prohibits source code distribution of a driver based off information obtained under NDA. Apparantly, from the successful development of drivers for past Trident chipsets, this part wasn't enforced.
Now, Trident seems to be enforcing that part -- by not providing information to XFree86 developers on the CyberBladeXP and CyberBladeXPm chipsets. The XFree86 developers wanted to amend the NDA to allow source distribution.
Since there has been no change in the NDA, only in enforcement, Trident is claiming that they provide the same support as before. Technically, they do -- sign the NDA and provide binary-only drivers and they'll provide docs.
So, if you support the idea of source code availability for video drivers, keep an eye on the graphics chipset used in your next potential laptop. If it is Trident, look elsewhere.
Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.