Slashdot Mirror


QNX RTP Running on iPaq

An anonymous reader sends in: "iPaq just got new gracious looks. QNX microkernel and the gracious Photon micro GUI did wonders to iPaq. Get a sneak preview here. If you are in Boston next week, be sure to drop by Embedded Systems Boston to try your hands at the qPaq... ;)"

13 of 157 comments (clear)

  1. FP! by nanci · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    first ploats YOU SLOBBARGOATS!

  2. n+1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    (n + 1) th post !

  3. They don't get it- by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    They "don't get it", I want to be free maaaaaaan!

    1. Re:They don't get it- by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      No you don't got it ! Get it ?

  4. Understanding Jamie McCarthy! by O.+P.+P.+Returns · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Less than a week ago, I posted some information to this site regarding the ongoing failure of their efforts to filter the site. Since then, my account has been effectively eliminated, as I expected would happen when I posted the information. Revolutionaries are seldom welcomed by the established power, after all.

    No editor stepped forward to claim responsibility for the attack, but evidence points to Jamie McCarthy, as I was involved in a short exchange with him as a result of the aggressive editor moderation. During our brief discussion, "jamie" made the interesting claim that the bitchslap was never used on anyone except bots. This is a cynical attempt to deceive the slashdot readers.

    Let's stick to the facts and examine the evidence:

    While doing some unrelated research on the web, I happened upon this story of a truly unjust bitchslapping by either Hemos or CmdrTaco. I can only assume that "jamie"'s non-reply to my question about modslap indicates that he is aware that this had taken place. I understand that this is probably not news to several other posters. I must point out that Taco repeatedly refers to the modslap script as "bitchslap" in his correspondence. There is no almost no difference between the two.

    The article describes an incident in which a user was bitchslapped for not moderating according to the beliefs of the slashdot editors.

    Even as I was writing the article on slashcode, I was not aware of how serious the problems at slashdot are. Here is an incident in which the editors were happy to unleash a bitchslap on almost no provocation. I repeat, "If you don't mod the way he likes, your moderating days are over, and your karma plummets to bitchslap levels."

    While the bitchslap script is apparently still in operation, modslap is probably not used in it's original form. I do know that karma can be lost for unsatisfactory meta-moderation, as I have seen this happen to one of my accounts, during a period in which that account had not posted or moderated anything. What this evidence does reveal is that the slashdot staff have no particular loyalty either to their readers, or to freedom of speech. They are willing to suppress your posts and your account according to their own opinions.

    "jamie"'s comments reveal a confused attitude towards the meaning of freedom of speech, as does this excerpt from his website:

    I believe strongly in free speech. I believe just as strongly that no one is required to nod along with a liar, and pretend that he is making valid points: to pretend that crackpots deserve equal billing on the marquee.

    Evidently, Jamie McCarthy thinks that "crackpots" should be afforded fewer rights than us right-thinking people. I wonder what sort of free speech rights he thinks should have been given to "crackpots" like Galileo? Or modern "crackpots" like Richard M. Stallman?

    Besides Seth Finkelstein, do any of the contributors to the now defunct censorware.org actually understand what free speech means? I advise Jamie, and the other slashdot editors to read, or re-read John Stuart Mill's essay "On Liberty" and Voltaire's "Essay on Tolerance" to remind them why free speech is not conditional on what is being said.

  5. Re:iPaq rhymes with... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic
    I agree.

    We live in a democracy.

    Do you think we could get a "it's ok to fuck the censormaster michael in the ass" law passed if we lobbied enough congress critters?

  6. Re:Where is the... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    I believe TuPaq is dead.

  7. Re:Sad News... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    How exactly is this sad news? Is anyone besides Rob going to miss his (ex)penis?

  8. Re:damn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    would you like to fuck it?

  9. Molly Shannon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    I sure would like to fuck Molly Shannon!

  10. Re:Sad News... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    how exactly did this get a score of 2???

  11. MOD PARENT UP ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    This is the kind of news they will _never_ post to front page.

  12. Fucking Molly Shannon? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic
    That old bitch?

    Fucking pervert.