Slashdot Mirror


A Quarter-Million Dollar Box For A Free OS

popeyethesailor writes: "According to a CNET story, the server startup Egenera will be debut its high end Linux servers for financial services customers, running Red Hat Linux. An earlier CNETstory details their design." That's a hefty pricetag, but the companies they hope to sell to ("market--financial-services companies and service providers") aren't shy about investing in tools. Of course, an S/390 isn't cheap either, no matter how many GNU/Linux images it's running ;)

3 of 113 comments (clear)

  1. redhat high availability server? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative


    Looks like they bought a copy of the Redhat High Availability server for about $2000 and loaded it into a rack of CPU's.


    Pretty much any competant tech could do it. I've had customers running systems like this for Geophysical 3D Migrations for over a year now. No big deal really.


    It sure took me forever to find a "product" in their website. Mostly just organisational and marketing bullshit.


  2. Not A New Idea by GeekSoup · · Score: 2, Informative

    Check out www.rlxtechnologies.com. They have had the same technology available for almost a year now. The 'blade plane' for reducing the number of cables needed... etc... etc... And you can get three blades in a 3U case for $5k.

  3. Re:Another destined failure? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    You probably are being too harsh. IBM Mainframes have MTBFs in the 50-year range. That's reliable.

    An IBM mainframe will "call home" and order a replacement part as soon as it detects fluctuations in performance indicative of imminent failure.

    When the CPUs are running, they're each really two CPUs - at a per-instruction level on the silicon itself, if the results from both CPUs
    differ, the CPU is "retired".

    There's similar failsafes and interlocks all through the system.

    And the I/O throughput is both phenomenal, and transactional.

    The PC has a MTBF of a few years, often much less. Thus, while you might get equivalent computing power, once you get up to a few hundred PCs, you spend as much time running around "changing lightbulbs" - i.e. replacing PCs that have failed, as doing useful work.

    The PC hardware architecture is a "toy" compared to a mainframe, or even a commercial unix box, or (ironically, given the amiga's "toy" image) even an old amiga motherboard.